Why does the USA suck so hard at ground vehicles?
Why does the USA suck so hard at ground vehicles?
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
shit bait cant wait to see it get 300 replies
>DA TANK BLOW UP DAT MEEN IT BAD
It took 20 years for the Bradley to actually be outdone.
You have to try harder vatnigger before you get my (You)
Should just buy German.
This desu.
>inb4 somebody reees with those suicided Roach 2A4s which they drove rigt into enemy territory without infantry or used as stationary howitzers.
The KF-41 Links is in the running to replace the Brapley, but the Griffin is almost certainly going to win.
High brass in Pentagon, sniffing each others ass eating all their money on a shit BRAPley, and other retard spaz projects. A scout, Anti-tank, and a troop front line vehicle. That is too much like a tank do recon, Too lightly armored to be a match for a tank, Carries enough ammo to take out half DC, but can't even carry 10 troops as an APC, and a giant target on the battlefield. A giant poisonous burning aluminum ammo and meat cooker.
Nice try Chang
What Minecraft mod is this?
>they fell for it
>OP is baiting
>Post in their thread
>Sitll giving them a (You)
>I have to bite the bait to not tell you to bite the bait
this board sucks shit since the nazi larpers joined
Leo good tank
Abrams good tank
Leclerd good tank
Challenger good tank
guys, i think i like tanks
>ignores the hundreds of accounts of BMPs exploding and burning their crews to death because Russia made them out of fuel tanks and ammo racks.
>forgets the Iraqi tank battalions destroyed by Bradleys.
>ignores the hundreds of accounts of BMPs exploding and burning their crews to death because Russia made them out of fuel tanks and ammo racks.
If Jow Forums was to design and build an APC, that is pretty much what I imagine we'd make it, except we'd also add tons of dakka everywhere!
>what are strykers
Why are you so fucking butthurt? Just take his question as it is meant and respond to it. SHOW why US doesn't suck at ground vehicles instead of acting like a little turd pointing at other countries and obsolete vehicles and saying WHAT ABOUT THEEEEM.
You're a teenager, you have no option but to be immature, but you don't have to compound your trouble by being impolite too.
Pieces of shit?
I bet that sand person is gonna get tons of cancer being around that wreck if he doesn’t get droned first
>SHOW why US doesn't suck at ground vehicles
>Dude just effortpost a response to my bait lmao
It's plainly obvious to anyone non-retarded that the US's armor is fine.
Not our fault you don't read.
>Dude just effortpost a response to my bait lmao
That's literally how boards stop being shit, but keep wallowing in your pigsty, don't let me stop you.
>It's plainly obvious to anyone non-retarded that the US's armor is fine.
And you could have shown that and we all could have enjoyed US armor being cool ITT. Instead you decided to be a cunt.
Based sandnigs
>responding to low effort bait is how boards get better
No they get better by saging low effort bait
can someone explain how iraq could field one of the biggest armies in the world once upon a time?
They had a lot of oil money and a big population.
for what reason did they do it? for the lulz?
>for what reason did they do it?
for subjugating their neighbors to their will, see Kuwait, Iran-Iraq war
Here you go.
youtube.com
I really hope this is bait. This is such a retarded post.
They suck compared to what and in what era?
hownew.ru
good boards dont have people constantly using bait to spoonfeed them information, so effortposting in response to said bait does nothing but fuel the retard who made the bait in the first place.
>there are people who unironically think pentagon wars was historically accurate
haha yeah nazis are bad right guys
>WAAAAAAAAAAAAA SHITPOSTERS RUINING THIS OBVIOUS BAIT THREAD
>Jow Forumseddit
and stay there retard
r/T_D cope
It is almost word for word, bait.
You got me bro, stay smart HH.
itt: everyone is american and merely pretending
It doesn't, and combat records prove it. No tank is indestructible, but American armor is generally pretty crew survivable for catastrophic hits, and that's the important part.
THERE WAS NO PROPER QUESTION! IT'S THE SAME AS POSTING THE TITANIC AND GOING "WOW WHY DOES THE UK BUILD SHIPS THAT SINK" JESUS FUCKING CHRIST
>Griffin
with a 50mm cannon? is it even an auto cannon at this point?
Yes, the XM913. Bigger autocannons, like the 75MM XM274, have been built in the past.
youtube.com
looks breddy gud actually. I think it's a bit overkill though.
> POSTING THE TITANIC AND GOING "WOW WHY DOES THE UK BUILD SHIPS THAT SINK"
To which you laugh and post a few cool UK ships. If everyone in the thread does that, much better time is had by all than the whiny bullshit that permeates this thread.
>I think it's a bit overkill though
The idea is to ensure a kill on stuff like the Kurganets and Type-05, and provide more airburst capability to swat down drones.
huh, and here I thought they were wanting a light tank in a ifv
You might be thinking of Mobile Protected firepower. GDLS entered a Griffin with a stripped-down Ayybraps turret for that, while BAE is offering the M8 Ridgeway again.
>cries the user sad no one takes his bait seriously
This :3
Watch the movie "Pentagon Wars" and then think about whether that question is worth asking.
Over 70% of posters ITT have responded to me in a fit of rage that I pointed out they were throwing tantrums and acting like children.
You know that everything in that movie is made up, right?
Don't do this, ever. Please. Pentagon Wars has nothing to do with reality
sure
That's a bong tho
I wasn't aware that the Bongs are using Bradleys.
They had just gotten done fighting the Iranians in a quasi-WW1 style war while also dealing with the Kurdish separatists up north
One of these days I'm going to write up an effortpost on everything wrong with the Movie
>thinks anyone cares, just because they laugh at him
Kek, okay champ
>BMP-2 made 1980
>Bradley IFV made 1981
>not comparable
Is this what your brain on fetal alcohol syndrome looks like?
Not worth my time to make a reasoned response to a shill/troll.
The spice must flow
What does nazis have to do with this you retarded jew
>Be Stryker
>Be the American BTR
>Military has no fucking clue how to use it due to lack of a motorized infantry doctrine
>Try to use it like a Bradley in a mechanized infantry way
>Gets fucked
>"Must be a shitty vehicle"
No
>inb4 you're replying to a ten hour shitpost
USA and USSR both make great equipment. Problem is they are afraid to fight each other because of nukes and instead supply their equipment to third world proxies that are incompetent almost beyond belief. This leads to their equipment getting a bad rap.
US stuff is much better than the Saudis in Yemen make it look and USSR stuff was much better than the Arab League made it look in Israel.