This thing is a fucking dream. I thought it would be a gimmick because of the robocop esque design...

>and you can't take the can off and use it on a different weapon.
The design is brilliant. It's significantly more compact than the alternatives.

Attached: maxim9+USP.jpg (2500x1404, 1.16M)

It's shorter, that's about it.
Personally I value the ability to move a can between weapons far more than I value a medicore suppressed 9mm being slightly shorter. YMMV, of course. What are you using it for where you really need that length savings, or is it just a cool range toy?

I mean can you holster another IWB pistol with a can?

nice redditpost, faggot. no you're not cc'ing that thing

No you are

1) Post a pic of you CCing that behemoth IWB.

2) Explain why you even need a can for a carry weapon anyway. People who fire their carry guns don't get hearing loss as a result of it.

oh mr, please tell me that I don't actually have tinnitus and hearing loss as a result of discharging a 9mm with no ear pro
I don't?

You can damage your hearing from a single discharge dude

Sure, there's a tiny chance of that happening. But the chance is vanishingly small.
It would make more sense to pack a full trauma medkit with you 24/7 than it would be to worry about hearing damage from concealed carry, yet I doubt you're packing one of those.

If you like the gun because it makes your dick hard, that's cool, just admit it to yourself. There's no rationalizing anything about this gun from a practical standpoint.

Yes I am. It’s not that difficult to conceal, and like I said there’s a smaller version.
silencerco.com/media/contentmanager/content/documents/silencers/wp_maxim_9_3_5.pdf
I must sound like a shill but I love this thing

No shit it CAN happen. The question is: is it likely enough to happen to warrant lugging that huge-ass brick with you? I suggest that no, it's not likely enough to warrant that.

It does make my dick hard, but it’s also a fine weapon and has its practical applications. I see it more as a the first step in the development of better handguns with integrated suppression though, albeit a leap and stride of a first step.

I'm still waiting for a pic of you carrying that IWB bro.....

I use it to plug raccoons. Its much easier and handier than the USP. Once you use for more than a range toy the utility factor becomes abundantly clear.

posting stats

Attached: 92455336-5571-4B0F-8963-9A83A85C2753.jpg (586x1087, 250K)

>its practical applications
Name one.

> I see it more as a the first step in the development of better handguns with integrated suppression though
That's valid.

No one is going IWB any silenced pistol.

No, you fucking retard, the chances of destroying your hearing with repeated impulses from something at 155+ db is very very fucking high. If you unironically believe this stupidity crank off a couple of shots in a building or vehicle and get back to me.

The probable difficulty in concealing the longer version aside, this would look fucking badass to carry openly.

All of these anons falling for this scam when you could buy a colt .45 or a makarov.

>permanent tinnitus and deafness is a scam

Any gun works for plugging raccoons, user.

>>Once you use for more than a range toy the utility factor becomes abundantly clear.
Utility factor? Lol, go on: explain why this is a better clandestine critter blaster than, say, a PCC AR with a can, or a suppressed .22 pistol or rifle?

>Enjoy suppressed shooting across the country. No 4473, no $200 tax stamp, no photographs, and no fingerprints. Ship a Maxim 50 straight to your door with few exceptions.
>Most states classify muzzleloaders as “antique firearms,” therefore a moderator permanently affixed is merely that — a moderator — not a silencer. Yet the Maxim 50 holds the same benefits as a suppressed rifle: reduced recoil and hearing safe sound results.
that’s actually pretty neat

retard

>the chances of destroying your hearing with repeated impulses from something at 155+ db is very very fucking high

Yet the chance of you even using the weapon in that circumstance is very very low, making the whole situation entirely moot. Who cares if there's a 25% risk of hearing damage, when the chance of you shooting the weapon without earpro is .000001%?

It's not that I don't believe guns are loud. I get that. Rather, it's the fact that you'll probably never need to fire the weapon without earpro in the first place that makes the whole thing so absurd.

faggot, I've ND'd a 9mm in my carseat with all the doors closed and I'm fine.

you have tinnitus and impaired hearing and probably don’t realize it then. based retard

fuck you, my hearing is even better than it was before

>Tinnitus and permanent meaningful hearing damage from a single shot in an enclosed area.
are noguns even trying anymore

Isn't that a Dominator from PsychoPass? Holy fuck the cyberpunk dystopia is really here.

Attached: feature-image-psycho-pass.jpg (620x323, 69K)

Do you even own it you useless nigger?

Attached: 1566110196344.png (392x252, 123K)

how long does it last before you have to break it down and replace the steel wool or whatever

>IWB
They make a shoulder holster for it which makes it more concealable than a j-frame revolver. IWB is for compact babby guns.

The only reason I mentioned IWB is because of this thread, in which some assclown mentioned that specifically. See Sure you could carry it in a shoulder rig, though it's idiotic to claim it's more concealable than a J-frame. A J-frame can be carried in any sort of holster (shoulder included), or you can just drop it in a pocket. If you're going to carry this fucking beast in a shoulder rig you're going to need some pretty serious clothes to cover it up, greatly limiting its concealability.

>pretty serious clothes
CUTE.
I was only slightly wrong about the j-frame being less concealable. A J-frame is .08" thinner than the Maxim 9 and width is the ONLY factor limiting concealability in a shoulder rig.

Attached: YouCut_20190802-VideoToMp4.webm (864x496, 1.91M)

Wow a video of a guy standing still! That sure convinced me!

>and width is the ONLY factor limiting concealability in a shoulder rig
Nonsense.

With other carry options you don't even need the goofy ass shirt

Give me an hour, nigger. I'll show you a side view with varying motions. I've interacted with people who's job is to notice guns and have never been found out.
>goofy ass shirt
Ok that's just rude.

>Give me an hour, nigger. I'll show you a side view with varying motions
Please do.

>Ok that's just rude.
It's hyperbole, but the underlying fact remains valid: if you use a shoulder rig then you need either a loose shirt or a jacket to cover it up. That's a limitation that doesn't apply to any other method of carry. It's disingenuous to claim that this is somehow "more concealable than a J-frame" when your proposed solution not only requires a shirt or jacket (which most J-frame carry methods do NOT require), but would also work even better with that J-frame.

>he's a pretty big guy

>Non-moving view just from the front
now do a video of your entire day with multiple times sitting down, bending over to grab something or reaching for something on the top shelf

>striker
Into the trash it goes

A shirt doesn't fix all problems with printing. The tip of a holster or barrel will press against the relatively tighter pant leg and be lower on the leg than a jacket will cover up. Pockets are the one acception because you can print all day in a pocket and everybody will assume it's your keys or phone. I will admit that there are only a few circumstances where it's a viable option where you're either already going to be wearing a jacket/shirt, are determined to carry a big gun, or both (like me).
Working on it. Should be done in like 30-45 minutes. I'll try to include sitting down, but only if there is ANY noticeable printing because that is the one motion that doesn't affect any area of where the gun is.

>09/17/19(Tue)18:33:00 No.42640228▶

>Working on it. Should be done in like 30-45 minutes

OPwillsurelydeliver.jpg

Again?

for every retard who says that firing a 9mm in an enclosed space won't give you mild hearing loss and permanent tinnitus there's someone else who has been in such a situation and is living proof that the opposite is true

I ND'd my Shield in my Jeep and was fine. No hearing damage before that, cleared up after about a day. Hearing same as before. I don't know how you can get more enclosed than that.

No...even if that weapon is made, you would never see it fall in public hands.

>ND posting

>Jeep owner being a retard

Yeah it checks out.

Haha, fuck. I forgot.
What angles y'all want to see?

Attached: exaggerated movements.webm (864x496, 1.73M)

>cross-draw
>boomerman outfit

Attached: w637467t.gif (348x250, 553K)

I fucking built it. Hope you enjoy.

It was shit that's why it's not being sold anymore
NEXT

fucking maggot just wait for the storm to wipe away nay-sayer pieces of shit like you.

Soon a new age of revolutionary weaponry will unveil.

Listen kid i've been involved in multiple deep state highly classified missions and everything i build works perfectly. EVERY TIME.

Fucking piece of shit get ready for the storm.

Tried it with the intention of buying one if I liked it.

I didn't like it.
>trigger is garbage, everything wrong with a glock trigger this thing is worse with. Heavy, mushy, long reset.
>sights are pretty basic. Can live with them, but not great.
>suppressor is LOUD. 147gr subs with the full-length configuration is just barely hearing-safe; 124gr +P defensive loads aren't even remotely safe
>craps up from blowback super fast, at least twice as fast as normal pistol+can. Only get about 200-250 rounds between fouling-induced malfunctions even with "clean" ammo.
Neat idea, the result was pretty underwhelming.

Cross-draw is literally the only way to draw from a shoulder rig, retard. I'm going to pretend I didn't read that second part so you don't look stupid for insulting GLORIOUS MIAMI AESTHETIC

ergo the point that shoulder rigging is fucking retarded to begin with. and, pineapples? come on

Attached: 51x2lP1jsML.jpg (500x460, 58K)

based coon genocide man

Cross draw is retarded IWB because it is less stealthy and harder to reach than it being on your strong side. Drawing from a shoulder rig is as natural and inconspicuous as crossing your arms. The pineapple shirt is my least favorite but I like it as a "deep cover" option since nobody thinks ill of the man with the pineapples.

I’ll risk my hearing for a chance to legally end someone.

Attached: B0D21669-1844-4E38-9CF7-6018C35A3F74.jpg (652x960, 78K)

Nice. Can't tuck your shirt in or wear a fitted coat but it's legit.

Good work

The only thing I don't like about the Maxim is thst the frame looks like it was 3d peinted and then half-assedly sanded and never really finished.

Took me a long time to realise that it was its final form

>Any gun works for plugging raccoons, user.
I can tell you've never shot a raccoon. If you've got all night and want to dump a mag of 22 into one, I suppose it "works".
You do you, I'll stick to whatever the fuck I like.

Except it's loud as fuck

Hello, 1980s time traveler!

what a chad

It doesn't even sound like a cap gun in all the video reviews. I think you're full of shit

this has to be a joke.

Subcompact with a Gemtech Aurora would be easier.

Why would you expect realistic sound reproduction from a YT video?

based pineapple shirt.

>he's a pretty big guy
yeah, he'll prob get the diabetes....oh sorry....."for you"

139.9 decibels is what they're reporting. 140 is damaging. I'll dial back my "loud as fuck" to "crap I should have brought hearing protection"

I rented one a while back and didn't like it. It was quiet, quieter than my heritage rough rider, even with the range's cheap 9mm. I hated the trigger though, I thought it felt like shit and made the thing really awkward to shoot.

Attached: IMG_20190624_180130936_1.jpg (3569x2180, 1.51M)

are you fucking retarded? You know what sound compression is? You know that computer speakers can't possibly recreate real sound or else you'd need hearing protection to watch youtube videos, right?

nigger you don't understand, it's a 100% risk of hearing damage. it's not a fucking dice roll

One-time instances of noise that does not outright burst your eardrums is not going to cause a noticeable amount of hearing damage. The damage is cumulative and takes several instances before you will actually have a tangible change in your hearing.

>The damage is cumulative and takes several instances before you will actually have a tangible change in your hearing
so... like if I was a hobby gun owner and shot frequently? Like that?

I am capable of judging by ambient noise in the recording. niggas can comfortably talk over it.

here:
youtu.be/8WKMx6aTm68?t=440

the slide is louder than the subsonic rounds

Yes. You would definitely want to have earpro even when shooting a slightly noisy gun when you're just practicing. The point of my post is that you're not going to be permanently deafened by the ONE time you may need to use it without protection. The fear of unsupressed gunfire is wildly blown out of proportion in the context of one-time use.

>the ONE time you may need to use it
Don't make me get my collection of anecdotes of people who needed a dozen or more rounds to stop the threat.

Nice. Cellist here, and likewise, but I CC a suppressed .22lr as anything larger is not going to be quite quiet enough for me. I mean, if I end up cornered, no choice but to cap an ass, I'm going to want enough discretion that I can make a hasty getaway before ye olde constabulary arrives for Q&A time. Just not up for some low-life would-be attacker robbing me of my freedom as a sort of parting gesture with his death. Precisely placed subsonics at around 114dB, picking up my brass if there's time, then navigating the world of security cameras, dash cameras, intersection cameras etc as I make my way home... gosh modern life is hard.

"One time" referring to the situation, not a single gunshot. Multiple shots in a short time will still not hurt your hearing enough to ruin your ears as long as it's not a commonly reoccurring situation.

That is such fuddlore. A single shot above 150dB can permanently damage a person's hearing. That's an average. Sometimes you get permanent hearing impairment at 140dB, single exposure, sometimes at 160dB, it varies a lot by the acoustics of the space, the individual's ear canal shape, eardrum fragility, etc. People imagining that the stress of the situation somehow protects the ears are living in a feel-good fantasy, it just ain't so.

>>nigger you don't understand, it's a 100% risk of hearing damage.
No. Plenty of people have discharged firearms in confined spaces and they are not deaf.

>so... like if I was a hobby gun owner and shot frequently? Like that?
Exactly like that. Very relevant for frequent shooting. A non-issue for CCW, which is what we are discussing here.

>I am capable of judging by ambient noise in the recording.
No, you are not.
What you don't realize is that it takes a very specialized microphone to even accurately record a gunshot. Whatever camera mike that some random youtuber is using is not that. The mike isn't even picking up the proper sound of the gunshot. What's more, the signal is processed when it is recorded. The software doing that job thinks that the very high spike in the recording (form the gunshot) is an error and filters it out.

Even if you have perfect speakers the whole exercise is pointless because the hardware being used is inacapable of recording the volume level required, and even if it was, the software will have filtered it out--both deliberately, and as a result of lossy compression.

>the slide is louder than the subsonic rounds
That's because the sound of the gunshot itself is being cucked by the recording, while the sound of the slide isn't.

>People imagining that the stress of the situation somehow protects the ears are living in a feel-good fantasy,
Nobody is imagining that.

We're saying that given the incredibly low chance that you will need to use your CC gun at ALL, combined with the fact that a small number of shots isn't likely to cause significant harm, means that hearing damage from CCW use is extremely unlikely, and doesn't justify the herculean task of concealing that monstrosity.

Chance of needing to shoot at all x risk of hearing damage from a shot = total risk.

Given that the first number is really fucking small, and the second number is also small, the resulting risk is microscopic.

Can you reccomend a good leather shoulder holster?

Post forearms

>No. Plenty of people have discharged firearms in confined spaces and they are not deaf.
True. It happens. Will it work that way for any particular human being on some random occasion? Maybe. Maybe not. Want to gamble with your hearing? And "deaf" isn't the object here - hearing impairment is a matter of degree. As in missing out on more and more sounds, not hearing when a car is about to hit you while you're looking the other way, until maybe some day you're reading lips to understand conversations. I have a friend like that. Lots of protected shooting during training, too much unprotected shooting in the field. If he's not looking at me when I start talking, he has no idea. Gunfire is loud.