MSNBC wants your opinion

MSNBC wants your opinion.

msnbc.com/msnbc/poll-do-you-think-people-should-be-allowed-carry-guns-public

Attached: msnbc.jpg (824x334, 34K)

Other urls found in this thread:

m.youtube.com/watch?v=kKnqDljpp_o
archive.fo/SWBUB
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

These Results are pretty based and rdspilled. I'd expext MSNBC to rig the results.

probably because the only people voting are pro-gun people who've been alerted to this poll

>Splitting yes into two options
Such a jew company

So far we're doing good

Attached: 93 percent.png (848x599, 33K)

this
only grabbers care that much about guns, normalfags just knee jerk "guns r bad" and then go back to literally never thinking about them unless the media is currently fearmongering

Mark my words: They are gonna rig it or sweep it under the rug

Attached: I voted.jpg (810x529, 53K)

I would be amazed if MSNBC made the results public.
K votes.

Fucking kek.

Attached: 1568230397900.jpg (768x433, 44K)

Only one of three things will come of this poll if the results stay like this:

1.) The results will be shoved under the rug

2.) They'll spin it to being racist or people not caring about the chilluns

3.) B-B-BOTS!!! FROM RUSSIA!!!!!

Funny how there's a yes and a maybe, but only one no.

Attached: 1535907199348.jpg (563x821, 181K)

the state i'm in allows open carry without permit
the way the question is framed makes it seems like you can't carry anywhere

Attached: source.png (720x330, 190K)

Same person fouth possibility. Given the third option they'll omit the Yes! question and just have the No only for self defense and No its too dangerous questions still of which the no they are too dangerous option is leading.

Voted on my phone and PC. 722k votes still at 93%

Attached: 1567632682332.png (500x563, 146K)

Its never going to be published fren.

Do they typically have these polls shown on TV as a main thing or something?

Needs to be a "I really don't care, so long as they don't shoot ME with it" option.

No like once an executive gets back from lunch and sees this slide onto their desk the poll will get yeeted.

I voted. Am I on a list now?

>implying you weren't already

user, if you post on Jow Forums they put you on 45 new watchlists every minute

this isn't /b/

>not even an American
>still vote in favour of the Second Amendment

For all intensive purposes the Native American tribes are being taken care of.
They live on their plantations with their own police and schools.
Receive government aid for life. Including all of their decendents.

Nigga have you seen what a rez looks like? That government aid isn't doing them any favors, if anything it's holding them back.

Only the small tribes, and it's not that simple. They're only allowed to build 1 tribal hospital per tribe, so they built a few clinics. Up until 1980 something they weren't allowed to build casinos. They only maintain their sovereign status through compliance. They still have to ask permission, or they'll step on state/fed toes.

>MSNBC wants your opinion.
No.

They want your data, and they want your clicks.

>intensive purposes

Attached: 5rBE5VN.jpg (700x360, 44K)

>pic
I'd rather I hadn't tbqh.

t. has never seen a rez

Being "taken care of" by the govt is not good for people.

I'm willing to bet this.

diamond dozen

checked and AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

Attached: 1559499496971.jpg (906x936, 849K)

The US Government lied and went against their word to them again and again. I used to resist the pity the Native's got. A lot like people here, but then I learned what actually went on. It's fucked up

it's actually two yeses that mean the same thing. One is for self and civil defence, one option is for self defence only.

keep voting

>46%
Those are rookie numbers, I’m disappointed in you all

Worse case ontario

Stop acting like such a pre-madonna.

Tell you what, I'ma slaughter your family then take your house, but I'll chain you up in your basement and feed you fish guts and IV fluids, so it's all good because you're technically alive and taken care of. Native Americans can get fucked because we're never giving it back, but let's not pretend we didnt skullfuck their entire society or that they're OK in any sense of the word

y

Attached: poll.jpg (787x442, 31K)

They shouldn't have violated the treaties like godless savages. They're lucky we let them live at all.

Still at 93%

50-50 bait. Half bait half truth. >Somekindofbaitdeathmachine

I hole-hardedly agree, but allow me to play doubles advocate here for a moment. For all intensive purposes I think you are wrong. In an age where false morals are a diamond dozen, true virtues are a blessing in the skies. We often put our false morality on a petal stool like a bunch of pre-Madonnas, but you all seem to be taking something very valuable for granite. So I ask of you to mustard up all the strength you can because it is a doggy dog world out there. Although there is some merit to what you are saying it seems like you have a huge ship on your shoulder. In your argument you seem to throw everything in but the kids Nsync, and even though you are having a feel day with this I am here to bring you back into reality. I have a sick sense when it comes to these types of things. It is almost spooky, because I cannot turn a blonde eye to these glaring flaws in your rhetoric. I have zero taller ants when it comes to people spouting out hate in the name of moral righteousness. You just need to remember what comes around is all around, and when supply and command fails you will be the first to go. Make my words, when you get down to brass stacks it doesn't take rocket appliances to get two birds stoned at once. It's clear who makes the pants in this relationship, and sometimes you just have to swallow your prize and accept the facts. You might have to come to this conclusion through denial and error but I swear on my mother's mating name that when you put the petal to the medal you will pass with flying carpets like it’s a peach of cake.

>They shouldn't have violated the treaties like godless savages.
Wait are we talking about the Indians or the US govt? Because I'm pretty sure the US govt violated treaties like godless savages.

it was fucked up, but have you ever met any? it's pretty hard to not treat them like npcs when that's what they act like.

not him, but it's worse than that.
Basically feather-boomers fucked them like snow-boomers fucked us.
>the previous native generation made shitty treaty deals for baubles and "modern conveniences"
>the new generation justly wanted to live on more than scraps
>they went to war
>they lost
We are walking in their wake.
also fun fact:
the "land is leased from our children" line came about in that period.
It was never meant to be an environmental claim, it was about the betrayal their ancestors committed in selling their birthright to the white man

Its a doggy dog world

I don't have the patients for this.

96 now

I saw that shit on TV a few weeks ago. Had to change the channel. Ugly as a man, Uglier as a man wearing women's clothing. Just nasty.

This made me as angry as it made me kek

Try this one on for size:
>Today i hurt myself
>To seen if I still feel
>I focused on the pain
>The thing thats only real
>The needle tore a hole
>The old familial sting
>Trying to kill it all away
>But I remembered everything

>What did I became
>My sweatest friend
>Anyone I known goes away
>At the end
>And you can has it all
>My empire for dirt
>I will have let you down
>I will have make you hurt

>I weared this crown of thors
>In on my liar chair
>Full of broked thoughts
>I can have repair
>Bequeath the stain of time
>The feeling are disappear
>You are something else
>I am still right here

>What did I became
>My sweatest friend
>Anyone I known goes away
>At the end
>And you can has it all
>My empire for dirt
>I will have let you down
>I will have make you hurt

>I I were start again
>A million miles apart
>I will keep myself
>I will found a way

>Jow Forums incels triggered by the concept of "yes, maybe, no"
lmao

Future is cloudy, please shake again!

>kids Nsync
>mother's mating name
Fucking lost

I hate you

welp, my day is ruined

>allowed

Imagine being a no guns faggot that circle jerks on Twitter talking about no knock raids and taking all the guns. Your favorite Rachel Maddow news corporation has a poll on their website related to guns.
You click ready to join the assumed 99% that says they should be locked away, not openly carried, and you see these results. Your whole world is turned upside down by a cheap poll on a lefty news website. You were so sure that there were only a dozen people left in the world that weren't deathly afraid of things that went boom, but 3/4 of a million people got there before you and voted "Fuck you". Your safe space of a lesbian news anchor has been invaded and you have nowhere to go. No longer do you know what to believe, this isn't Fox news after all. You click "No" as tears form in your eyes and watch as the bar stays 93% and you have no recourse. Did the Russians hack MSNBC? Did Trump do this? NeverTrump2020 on Reddit had such a great post about how guns and gun owners need to die and yet here you are staring at this... Did not enough people read his words? You cry, afraid and feeling alone.

Nigga still worries about lists

Based and cashpilled

Why isn't there an option for only white people

I agree, the US citizens refusing to stay east of the mountains was a war crime.

This sounds like the kind of retard who buys a drum mag for their glock.

Come and take it, cracka-ass cracka.

Attached: 1423399286270.jpg (594x574, 79K)

How do 90% of Americans supposedly support more restrictions, yet this poll of 3/4 million people says otherwise. Not scientific or empirical, but it's still an indication.

Any statistic put out by the Powers that Be is made to shape public opinion, not reflect it.

Daily reminder you goyim all spread terror.
m.youtube.com/watch?v=kKnqDljpp_o

Of course he became a tranny, he had the worst takes on Top Tens, far worse than based fat tank man.

He was an insufferable faggot so naturally he became a tranny. Its fitting

78% of statistics are made up

I don't know, can you repeat the question?

How else will nogs shoot each other user?

holy kek

Attached: rocketappliances.jpg (960x960, 117K)

i'm willing to bet the vast majority of those poll responses are bots

Why are they agreeing with the proest gun option though?

they'd probably just blame it on russian bots

This or they're going to pretend they never put out a poll to begin with.

>poll? what poll? have you seen this sandy vag ad we've made? oy vey ban all full semi-autos now goy!

you think pro gun people don't know how to set up bots or something?
not every bot is run by silicon valley or russia, bots are basic things that do basic tasks.

>poll? what poll?
Oh you mean the polls that say over 90% of Americans agree with common sense gun laws?

No polls exist outside of the NRA that say anything good about guns.

I just assumed /ourbots/ didn't exist

All 3 answers are wrong, nothing is guaranteed.

you can literally just pay people to have their bot armies do data input on public sites for you.

>Splitting yes into two options
This. They intentionally split yes between 2 options so they can later mention that no won in their poll. Fuck them.

I can pay the bots to find me a gf?

They will just claim the poll was hacked. I will never forget during the 2008 election Fox news discrediting their own poll that said Ron Paul won a debate. They just blew it off as internet trolling and moved on.

Voted

Attached: FDF1BB6B-4E23-4210-9EBC-1B56044BBA45.jpg (1860x1536, 225K)

Poll's from 2014 you boomer fucks

Really? They kept it up for 5 years and didn't bother to ever close it?
Where are you seeing this?

Do Bill Gates bodyguards carry guns?

Attached: GettyImages-629499932.jpg (1024x716, 93K)

Internet archive
Saved 131 times between May 5, 2014 and September 4, 2019.

Cool, can I see the archive link?

Take screen caps of the results.

Attached: lol theyll manipulate.png (840x658, 34K)

archive.fo/SWBUB

Cool. Thanks user.

>allowed

SHALL

>Nearly 750k votes
This gives me hope