>I invite you to go to a local firing range and fire an assault weapon to see the awesome power of these weapons. You may say, wow, I don’t think this is a Second Amendment weapon.
tampabay.com
Another grunt posing as a weapons expert. It's scary to hear that a rifle would be lethal in war, I'd much prefer a non-lethal war rifle.
>anti-gun enlisted
How does this even happen? Why would someone that doesn't like guns want to join an organisation founded for killing?
5.56 is a pussy round compared to every 7.62 round even among intermediate cartriges.
Civilian aaaay aaaar does not hold a candle to MG-42 belt fed full auto 8mm machine gun
Also bolt action rifles were used in the last 4 major wars US has fought in. Ww1 ww2 , korean war and vietnam.
Because they're so worthless the only way they could make any money is joining the military
There's always a place for the destitute in the service. They can even get promoted. Scary.
Gibz
You can join the military and be on logistics or some non-combat role. A sissy joining up may do it to show they aren't a limp noodle or to try to get some level of respect, but it won't change their attitudes.
Sneed baybee
So they rather get shot with a .69 cal musket ball? Sorry that’s for war!
How about 45.70? Nope, that’s for war too!
.30 Krag? WAR!
450 Martini Henry? WAR!
8mm? 7.62x54r? 30.06? .308? WAR!
If those idiots have their way all that will be left is .22short long and LR.
Well at least the comment section is trash talking the author. A bit of fudd lore in there, but still encouraging.
Israel's military uses .22LR to shoot Palestinian children, that's a war caliber
Why do these servile faggots have to taint and sully the otherwise based state that is Florida? What a fucking sad, propagandized shill article.
I'm alright with M79s making a comeback
This is so stupid
>AR is weapon of war
>weapon of war should not be on streets
When the Constitution was writted, the Musket was the weapon of war. The intention of the founding fathers is beyond fucking obvious.
Yeah, but they aren't shooting then in a war! Just protests and such. Therefore it's fine.
At least, I wouldn't be surprised if that sort of logic was used.
It’s baffling the people responsible for these articles also remember how to breathe and blink.
>.22lr
Unironically for war, just ask Israel and for hire assassins. Hell he’d probably consider .177 for war as well, specifically for “expert marksmen who are trained to aim for the eyes” or some other retarded nonsense.
bolt guns are still in use for specialty applications lol.
but yea, it's fun to laugh at dumbasses who think the AR15 is a 'weapon of war', considering I own so many literal weapons of war and my AR's are not it.
I have an artillery spotter friend who mostly saw the end result. Rather anti gun
Have an artillery Sargent and EOD friend who instructed me how to make a directional claymore mine using a pie tin, heat reactive motor oil, back plated IED, and a scale
What I'm trying to say is people are wild
>wow, I don’t think this is a Second Amendment weapon.
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
>when you need to convince the priest that the church was shot up by the devil
>back plated IED
>heat reactive motor oil
Nigger what?
99% chance they held a non-combat MOS
nice larp, you have to be 18 to use this website though
So they can write snarky opinion pieces and people will assume they have some kind of valuable knowledge. And then eventually a lot of them will run for some public office and stand on their service to get votes. And yes, guns are weapons and therefore meant to be deadly. Somehow people think this is a compelling statement. It's like complaining that the stove is hot.
You know those high mileage motor oils? Well they work by heading towards heat. How? I don't fucking know. But since it moves towards heat and the human body is hot compared to most interiors....
Now you got an orientation device.
It was fucking terrifying seeing that shit follow you.
Then we made binary explosives. Good day
No larp, I assure you I'm a moron
I just know far more interesting people than myself
The second amendment is explicitly about weapons of war. It should have been even more explicit but these kike dick sucking fucks would find some way to pilpul their way into it meaning hunting or some shit no matter what. Fuck the US government. It has been illegitimate since 1934.
As someone that has actually made a few flavors of HE you sound like you are full of shit. Exactly what "binary explosive" did you make? A Chedite?
I'm convinced these people are far worse than the average "I never owned a gun but I want to ban them" crowd.
>I was in the military so I know these weapons of war don't need to be on our streets
>I hunt often so I know all you need is a bolt action
>I used to CC so I know you don't need to do it anymore (or alternatively, "My State had tons of training requirements so I know Constitutional Carry is a bad idea")
>I support the Second Amendment, but...
The worst part is you have the "I never owned a gun" crowd citing these fuckwits as if they're experts on the matter.
Lmao
pogs
I've noticed that the military graboid argument is notorious for getting BTFO. Normies, by and large, don't buy it, because they know the military is overwhelmingly right-wing and that this line of argument is selective shilling.
It's like finding a union member who supports right-to-work laws.
In my neverserved opinion, you shouldn't get "veteran" cred unless your "service" involved regular encounters with the Grim Reaper.
In my pog experience the vet worship is too damn high but it's not from the left. The left just uses the few commy vets they can to provide testimonies in favor of their views.
Being in the military sucks and even pog jobs wear people down and can fuck you up whether you were on a 2 way range or not.
Vet card is overplayed but the cred applies to everyone because they all put up with the same shit. It's like a fraternity.
The second amendment was written for weapons of war, period. This is not debatable.
"A single M-16 bullet was designed to take off a hand at the wrist or ricochet inside a body to cause more medically untreatable damage. "
>The M-16’s small-caliber, high-velocity bullet would do more damage than the once standard, slower and larger 30-caliber projectile. A single M-16 bullet was designed to take off a hand at the wrist or ricochet inside a body to cause more medically untreatable damage
Dear lord, that shitty fuddlore ought to come from a nogunz who only parrots what he reads on the internet.
>What my military weapons training taught me years ago: The M-16 (the fully automatic-capable version of the AR-15) was created to help increase the effectiveness of American soldiers facing similarly armed enemies.
nope, they were created to make soldiers more maneuverable because the ammo was lighter
that's literally the only reason
how did this fag get off to such a bad start?
I know several military people who saw combat that think not everyone should have ARs and such because they "haven't undergone proper training like I did" and that they're "dangerous for an untrained civilian to operate" like the military finds the most brilliant citizens and gives them all elite training to go die in some foreign desert.
I mean, the AR platform is designed to be operable by 60 IQ cannon fodder. Shooting a rifle is not rocket surgery.
To be fair 5.56 is designed to tumble which I guess is what they mean by "ricochet inside a body".
>built to be lethal in war
>wow, I don’t think this is a Second Amendment weapon
choose one.
Also, the "you don't have proper training" argument is disingenuous, like every other graboid argument. It really means "you are not worthy of arming yourself because I am above you".
Again I assure you I'm a moron. He'd just give me stuff to measure out. I remember him saying binary explosive. Might have been part of a wider conversation and we were making something else. I just did what he said and hot to push the plunger.
That reads like I'm a special needs kid on a school trip Jesus Christ
>you are not worthy of arming yourself because I am above you
They are
They have SPECIAL TRAINING
They were SOLDIERS
That's exactly their logic.
that's a nice ord collection, better than mine. i was going to say at least i have a ww1 gas grenade, but then i saw that one at the top left
He told you have to make an IED using a pie tin and an IED?
Because he held user combat MOS (assuming he isn’t lying about service) and is talking out of his ass
>You may say, wow, I don’t think this is a Second Amendment weapon.
Have these stupid cocksuckers even read the second amendment even one time? Do they think it says you have a right to shoot deer? The founders were pretty vocal in their support of citizen-owned artillery. Imagine doing absolutely no research into anything you put in an article and calling yourself a journalist.
I have a least as much training as your average minuteman. And my aim is a damn sight better than point in the general direction of the enemy and fire.
I jumped out of a few airplanes, does that count?
Reminds me of products with "military grade" slapped on them when that just means "built by the lowest bidder"
All rifles are built to be lethal in war. That's the whole fucking point of them.
A fucking bow and arrow is deadly is just as deadly as an M416 in the hands of the right person.
>Wowie gee why is this gun so dangerous?
Yes, they genuinely believe that the 2A was meant for hunting, because slightly dated English scares and confuses them
If they had it their way it be nerf or nothing
What is that?
Did you say 'non-lethal war rifle'? Because I'm pretty sure those are war crimes.
>be human resources fobbit or supply puke
>get out
>grow operator beard and use the picture you took of yourself holding someone else's 249 in Kuwait to convince people you were somebody
>use 'military experience' to push political talking points
It's all so tiresome.
Real talk the 2nd amendment is so plainly written a 5 year old could tell you what it means. What these gun grabbing communists faggots are doing is their classic tactic of warping language to their most twisted limits in order for it to fit their ideology. When the 2ndamendment was created private civilians owned cannons and large warships capable of broad siding cities. To think they’d be horrified at an AR is laughably stupid
Literally for the benefits. A friend of mine is anti-gun; believes that people must be professionally trained before being allowed to even own one. He's currently in ROTC to join the military to pay for his education.
>B-but mass shootings!
We had those back then with muskets, too.
POGS in it for the welfare and status
beehive to shoot a bunch of .22 out of a 40mm launcher at the same time. an user made one for his 26.5 flare gun that was pretty cool.
>I hunt often so I know all you need is a bolt action
Do hunters really need 5 round capacity to hunt deer and a detachable magazine for faster reloading?
>B-but mass shootings!
>We had those back then with muskets, too.
Mass shootings are severely overhyped. They are a small minority of all murders.
I never understood what theyre pushing for when they say that and havent gotten answer.
Is it a class where they just tell you in different ways dont unjustly shoot people with your assault rifle?
>mfw the port shooter fixes his bayonet after firing from his musket and all of his 4 gun flintlock bandolier
Also this.
They basically spend a part of a day discussing deescalation tactics and rules of engagement in regards to use of deadly force. Which may be nice if you’re an MP just standing around all day telling some drunk to piss off but as a civilian getting robbed odds are asking him to not rob you won’t do shit. To say that they are “trained” in firearms is definitely overhyping unless you’re in a rate/MOS that actually deals with and fires guns on an active basis such as Gunners Mate, which most of these tools are not.
>that's a war caliber
No man they classified it as less than lethal!