Who the fuck thought this was a good idea?

battleorder.org

But w/r/t OP, seems it's hard to break the habit of dumb ideas

Attached: usmc.png (1046x737, 689K)

*Could not be*

Yeah? When'd you deploy?

6.5 to 7mm rounds are a lot like the m14 rifle. They're designed to fulfill every role but are shit at all of them. 6.5-7 are too powerful for general issue and not powerful enough for harder targets.
Keep 556 for general issue and keep 762 for GPMGs and designated marksman.

>Nobody said this.
>Point is you can easily carry three times as much ammo, and with no recoil,
>no recoil
You might not be retarded but you are surrounded by people who agree with you and are retarded. Rethink your position.

Great ballistics, but more recoil and heavier ammunition, 5.56mm already has good ballistics and is more practical overall, on top of having a massive industrial and logistical base.

If you want improvements, look at better loadings of 5.56mm, like M855A1, or Mk.262 Mod 1.

You want to compare pewter and ribbons? No you don't. You just can not support your claims with fact. You have a nostalgic love for a round and are too brainwashed by nationalism to realize you were not given a tool because it was in your best interest, or even in the armys best interest. The switch to ACUs should have been your first clue.
You are obviously a POG.

You probably think .270 British was a good idea.

The wolf does not go around reminding people it is a wolf.

Don't give a shit about any of that. I've tried making points but you've ignored them. In fact, I deconstructed your entire post but you mistook it for an opportunity to wax bullshit about Benning. Put up or shut up.