Why the fuck do people shill MLOK so hard...

Why the fuck do people shill MLOK so hard? I finally picked up an MLOK rail and this entire system is the biggest piece of shit I have ever encountered. All the screws back themselves out and it's some universal consensus that you have to use LocTite on all of these and somehow you are a retard for expecting anything else. You know what's funny though, this $9 picatinny to picatinny Chinesium mount I bought from Amazon held up completely fine. Yet somehow mil-spec ultragrade american made MLOK technology can't compete. Fuck I hate listening to retards on Jow Forums

Attached: VTAC-MLOK-2.jpg (1200x800, 162K)

Other urls found in this thread:

ndiastorage.blob.core.usgovcloudapi.net/ndia/2017/armament/McGee19427.pdf
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

Because some people have actually carried a rifle and would like it to weight less.

Also not everyone is a numale whose dad never taught them they have to use loctite on anything that will experience vibration or other stresses you stupid fucking retard.

>wanting a bunch of dicks on their rail

Attached: 1537241588467.jpg (650x432, 53K)

>not knowing that picatinny is the superior option

Attached: 37415EB1-948C-43CC-BF30-64BBE547A4E3.jpg (586x448, 76K)

Keymod and mlok are lighter than quad rails.

Mlok beat keymod in army tests.

>Army tests

You mean the same Army that said intermediate cartridges were a passing fad and the M14 was the way forward?

The Army that claimed Digital beat out Woodland in every possible way?

The Army that claimed the M17 was somehow a better choice than a Glock for mass issue despite the Glock already being well liked in service and the M17 being a literal non-drop-safe piece of shit?

get a better rail poorfag

Attached: 1535137115036.jpg (390x400, 50K)

No, different one, because it was actually the US Navy, not the army.
ndiastorage.blob.core.usgovcloudapi.net/ndia/2017/armament/McGee19427.pdf

>attaching shit to your hand guard
lmao