Subsonic 9mm characterization project - part 3

part 1:
part 2:
Ive finished testing all the 147 gr 9mm ammo at my disposal.
I tried to maintain the same methodology throughout the test. All shots were chronographed, results posted in p1 p2 and this thread. Pics of typical, best and worst 5 shot groups were also taken.

Continuing where we left off a few days back.

Attached: IMG_4151.jpg (2500x1404, 1.55M)

SPEER LAWMAN 147gr 9mm

Conditions were good, calm winds, mid 70s again.

Attached: IMG_4185.jpg (2500x1404, 713K)

Chronoed very well, low spread and standard deviation. Very consistent.

Attached: IMG_4186.jpg (2500x1404, 489K)

Unfortunately it did not group very well.
All 5 shot groups had roughly the same distribution.

Attached: IMG_4188.jpg (2500x1404, 655K)

some better, some worse.
none were exemplary.

Attached: IMG_4189.jpg (2500x1404, 524K)

next was Fiocchi 9mm JHP.
This was the only JHP in my group.
Conditions were again quite good, low 70s, winds under 5mph with some gusts. I waited until winds were calm to take my shots.

Attached: IMG_4190.jpg (2500x1404, 695K)

This ammo grouped the best, head and shoulders better than any other in my test group.
This is a 5 shot group.

Attached: IMG_4200.jpg (2500x1404, 489K)

This was a 10 shot group.
I know I pulled that flyer at 5-oclock.

Attached: IMG_4199.jpg (2500x1404, 525K)

It chronoed incredibly well as well.
Very consistent. Hotter than some of the others, but group sizes were great.

Attached: IMG_4203.jpg (2500x1404, 269K)

next was winchester t-train lead-free.
conditions were hot today. 85F and 5-10mph winds. I tried to wait until they settled down before taking shots.

Attached: IMG_4205.jpg (2500x1404, 971K)