Renders your B-52 obsolete

more like shoot your own planes and civilian aircraft

You must be confused, the A400M is made by Airbus but it's a military plane. S400 are completely useless against those

>A euphemism for western aerial combat cowardice
>n-no you can't just use weapons out of the range of our AA systems that's fucking cheating!!!!

America used to have stealthy cruise missiles. Cruise missiles covered in RAM. Then we demobilized them. But let that sink in.

Tomahawks. Which are harder to spot to begin with on subsonic cruise, covered in RAM.

Well, it's quite the cheap way to receive a cruise missile launching platforms.

And with all the remote carrier talk it's maybe even a crucial element of the 6th gen. You need a platform to launch those remote carriers and using a plane which you own anyway isn't too bad.

you mean Boeing 777, right?

F-35 becomes drone manager. Woopety Woop.

The RC-200 can even be launched vertically
So you could have the FCAS launching from a carrier and the RC-200 launched by its escort

>western aerial combat cowardice
You mean to say, you designed an AA system that has a lower maximum range then the thing it's meant to counter and it's not fair that they aren't flying into range so you can shoot at them.

The 40N6 (the 400km range missile for the s series) still hasn't been fielded in any useful numbers. The shipments China asked for were "delayed" first, then "blown off by a storm" in transit because Russia hadn't built them despite being "officially accepted into service" in 2018.

For practical purposes, the S400 is still using S300 era missiles.

That makes it sound boring. It's more like a 1 man AWACs with stealth and dogfighting ability.

Such capacities aren't even planned in any Block upgrades.

>fat Ameribloats and brown Euromuslims convincing themselves that their shitty military transport planes are invulnerable: the thread

>B52
>military transport plane
No, us amerifats use fighting aircraft to fight with. Unlike the vatniks that think air superiority means fielding a few outdated SAM sites that mostly work.

Seems to have effectively banned the F35 from Syrian airspace

>CNN howling
Why would Chinese publicise their actual reception of the missiles when misleading Fatistani intelligence services is this easy?

Air launches remote carriers will always have the advantage of improving range.

I wouldn't be surprised if such remote carriers are launched by 4.5th platforms like the Eurofighter.

>renders russian IADS obsolete

Attached: rms_mald_hero_img_wide.jpg (1920x521, 235K)

>Seems to have effectively banned the F35 from Syrian airspace

*gets blown the fuck up by Israel for the 100th time*
Yeah real effective at locking down Syrian airspace dude

I think the RC-200 is too big for an EF
The RC-100 definitely can and will

BBC Israeli hasn't been able to conduct air strikes deep in Syrian territory in recent times.

The only thing getting blown the fuck up here are BBCs your wife seeks out on Friday evenings.

>S400
Psshh nothing personnel kid

Attached: A400M-mit-DIRCM-System-articleDetail-d5ed0e33-1603880.jpg (1920x1280, 521K)

>Arabus A400M PBUH

Attached: deatkine_ti.gif (368x189, 8K)

:(

t. country with the highest % of muslims in Europe

your mum's bedroom is not a country

Seething

Shukran habibi

>why would Russians engage in slapstick-tier Soviet-esque face saving gambits after technological failure

It's what they do.

>BBC Israeli hasn't been able to conduct air strikes deep in Syrian territory in recent times.
lmaaaooooaooaooaoa
they blow up the T4 "fortress" every other month and just blew up an entire PMU base in the FAR east of Syria at the border of Iraq, don't talk about things you have zero clue about
Israel has had complete reign over Syrian skies and nothing has changed that, they'll continue to blow up retarded Syrian depots and air defense crews because they simply cannot be stopped

>get demolished in Vietnam war
>Spend the next 40+ years contriving all forms of propaganda across all media to convince yourself that you didn't lose

The absolute state of Muttskaya Oblast

>Israel has had complete reign
An American's favourite mantra during meditation

So you admit they've been conducting air strikes in Syria unchallenged nor has the Syrian and Russian trained/equipped air defenses prevented further attacks? Got it

Yes. We now observe the ineducable mongrel go to great lengths to rewrite history (which he can barely read in the first place) and pretend that the C-400 didn't force a drastic change of aerial strategy for BBC Israel

You said there hasn’t been any strikes deep in Syria despite not even 14 days ago Israel blew up an entire PMU base in deep Eastern Syria, nor has ANY defensive measures implemented by Russian and Syrian AD been remotely effective at stopping Israel from having complete and absolute free reign over Syrian airspace to conduct whatever operations they feel like doing
Tbh it’s really weird you’d even say that because anyone who reads the most basic headlines knows Syrians get blown the fuck up at least once a month by Israeli air strikes

Every single Isreali incursion has made sure to maintain great distance away from Xhmeinim base and to only focus on strategically useless targets in desolate parts of Syria. USAF strategists and NATO command effectively treats western Syria as a no-fly region after the introduction of the C400

>maintain great distance away from Xhmeinim base
No they don't, they fly right beneath it via the Lebanese mountains lmfao, why are you commenting on shit you literally have ZERO clue about?

>T4
>strategically useless
lol this guy has to be baiting or just clueless

>flying beneath a base

what kind of paranormal mongrel physics is this?

Attached: 1565320107271.jpg (945x709, 177K)

What?

How the fuck does an aircraft fly underground my fat magician friend?

How is T4 of any impact to Russian position in Syria?

>How the fuck does an aircraft fly underground my fat magician friend?
That isn't what I said, I'm confused? Are you confused about what I said or something? Beneath as it geographically south of the northern location of the Russian airbase, hence me saying "Lebanese mountains" which are directly south (beneath) the airbase? English not your first language or something? Genuinely confused right now lol, this is just bizarre

>How is T4 of any impact to Russian position in Syria?
it's the biggest logistics hub in eastern syria and the russians routinely use it so theres that im not sure why you specifically said russian when it's a syrian asset that is the largest strategic asset in that part of the country
there were massive battles over it that the russians lost men over
are you just shitposting btw you seem pretty clueless about all of this

>itt people getting baited by a shitposter
Lol

You seem to forget that Israeli forces only fly in that zone after coordinating with Russian forces in the region. The same goes for US aviation. It is not as if these flights go unnoticed.

clueless? You are the one using weasel words to try and conjure a reality in which Russian interests in Syria are more vulnerable than is true

>You seem to forget that Israeli forces only fly in that zone after coordinating with Russian forces in the region.
No they don't, the strike that happened not even 14 days ago wasn't coordinated with anyone, hence the massive chimp out from everybody from Iraqis to the Lebanese. You said Israel hasn't been able to conduct strikes deep in Syrian territory, this is false, they conduct them at will, when they want, no matter what, the Russians and the Syrians are unable and unwilling to stop them. This will continue to happen as long as the Israelis deem it necessary, they own the skies over Syria.

>T4 and Damascus gets blown up again for the 1000th time
>hurr but Israel can't conduct strikes in Syria

lol this is pretty hilarious bait desu

for as long as the 40N6 missile is not operational, the long-range engagement capabilities of S-300 and S-400 batteries are dependent on a single engagement radar to illuminate targets during much of the trajectory. While transmitting, that radar can be easily located – and if that radar is knocked out the battery becomes next to useless.

The short- (9M96) and medium-range (9M96DM) missiles for the S-400-system, however, have active seekers and are thus not dependent on illumination from the ground during the whole flight. But they cannot still be labelled – except at comparatively short ranges – as true fire-and-forget-missiles as they require updates of target-data by data link from the ground station while in flight

Another vulnerability of S-300 and S-400 systems is their capacity to handle multiple targets simultaneously. AnS-300 battalion’s target engagement radaris reported to be able to handle 12 targets simultaneously and the battalion has 24 missiles available without reloading.141Standard Russian practiceis to fire two missiles at each target. This means that an attack of more than 12 incoming missiles or glide bombs is likely to overwhelm the S-300 battalion–what in military jargon is called a saturation attack.142Similarly,anS-400 battery can have 16 long-range missiles ready to fire, or 64medium-range missiles or a mix of the two. A battalion of S-400 consists of two batteries and thus has twice those numbers. Russian sources claim the S-400 system can handle up to 36 targets simultaneously, but the number of missiles and the doctrine of firing two missiles means that a battalion can handle a maximum of 16targets at the same time with long-range missiles, or 64targets if only medium-range missiles have been loaded.143However, that two batteries in the same battalion should have loaded up withonlymedium-range missiles seems unlikely, as that would mean yielding the capability to engage at long range.

>they own the skies over Syria.
nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/report-russian-su-35s-allegedly-forced-israeli-aircraft-out-syrian-airspace-76891

mutts are impossibly dense

>your reading comprehension
I'm not biting your bait

>Israel can’t conduct strikes deep in Syria
>PMU base was erased off the map not even 2 weeks ago in the deepest part of Syria

lol

The large long-range missiles of the S-300 and S-400 systems are heavy and bulky (weighing close to two tons), which means that reloading after a salvo has been fired takes time.

These characteristics would seem to allow an adversary to devise a straight-forward saturation attack consisting of escort jamming, dozens of air-launched precision-guided stand-off weapons, and air-launched decoys.The incoming attack will force the battery to light up its engagement radar and reveal its location. Then, once the readied surface-to-air missiles have been expended on incoming decoys and missiles, taking out the engagement radar should not be too difficult.

that's a dircm system (possibly MUSIC) against an IR guided missile, the S-400 missiles all have RF guidance...

>national interest
You had me for a while but now I know for sure you have absolutely zero idea what you’re talking about, lmao. Syrian targets will continue to get destroyed st will by Israeli air strikes and there isn’t a thing Syria or Russian can do about it.

>national interest

Attached: 1559179442173.png (270x360, 66K)

>nationalinterest

Kek

account needs to be taken of the fact that the track record of Russian-made air defence systems against Western or Israeli airpower in Syria is less than impressive(see Appendix1). The loss of an IsraeliF-16 to Syrian SAMs in February 2018was a reminder that the IAF has operated without losses in Syrian airspace for more than three decades. The USA and its allies have successfully conducted two major raids on Syrian compounds associated with chemical warfare, in 2017 and 2018, without any effective response from Syrian or Russian air defences. Furthermore, as part of Operation Inherent Resolve against the Islamic State (IS) in Syria and Iraq, coalition air forces have conducted a good-size air campaign in Syrian airspace for four consecutive years.

This is the weirdest part about this shitposter claiming Israel can’t conduct air strikes in Syria when for literal decades now and still going on as we speak Israel has been skullfucking Syrian AD assets

>implying that strategic systems such as C400 are the only ones deployed by Russian forces in Syria

The additional complement of Pantsir, Tunguska and Tor system complete the air defence umbrella for Xhmeimim base and other dispatched russian personnel

>I can't argue against the source so I will cast unfounded aspersion on it

Fuckoff mutts it's maybe not al Jazeera or RT but it's the only reliable western news source

>Israel destroys targets deep in Syria despite russian protection, using stand-off munitions
>"n-no! Nooo! It's not fair! It does not count unless you use dumb bombs and fly straight above our SAM!"

Attached: vatnik.jpg (633x758, 109K)

Are there any backdoor agreements between IAF and RuAF that we don't know about?

Having taken stock of Russian A2/AD capabilities and possible countermeasures, what implications do these have? For the transatlantic alliance, the results of this study are comparatively optimistic, suggesting that Russian A2/AD capabilities are less formidable than is frequently claimed, and that an extensive set of countermeasures is readily available.

First, Russia’s A2/AD capabilities and the threat they might pose to NATO’s freedom of action have been exaggerated. While these capabilities are significant, both technical analyses and reviews from the Syrian theatre, suggest that they are considerably less impressive against moving targets than the marketing hype implies, and more vulnerable to countermeasures than is often appreciated.

>reliable
>nationalinterest
I love this kind of shitposting lol

>Bloviation: The post

What are your sources? Be kind enough to share them

it should be kept in mind that Russia is a country with a GDP comparable to Italy’s or Spain’s and beset with cronyism and corruption, where high-level attempts to modernize the economy and to develop a manufacturing base have failed, and where the economy is essentially based on the extraction of oil and gas.There are thus limits to the technical miracles that can be performed by its engineers and its industry.

Several of the advancements in technology and tactics that Russia has demonstrated for the first time in Ukraine and Syria –precision-guided air-dropped bombs, the use of drones for target-spotting, and long-range precision-guided cruise missiles –essentially reflect a level of sophistication that the US already possessed in the first Gulf War. So, copying these capabilities 30 years later,–at a time when you can buy a drone with satellite navigation and a camera at the local hobbyist store for a few hundred dollars –is no great feat. Nor is it in itself a sign of technical sophistication, particularly as some of these technologies have been bought from Israel or been pilfered by spies.

All those fancy systems and they can’t even stop a single Israeli air strike from obliterating an entire PMU base in the deepest part of Syria... woah...

nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/throw-away-history-book-star-wars-proof-battleships-are-truly-rip-76606

Attached: 1362518497739.png (441x603, 267K)

nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/rip-russias-stealth-fighter-why-su-57-serious-trouble-43542

Have it your way, vatnik.

Zooming out from the particulars above, our assessment is that Western capabilities to do counter-A2/AD are likely to increase significantly in the coming 10-15 years, in both an immediate and the medium-term perspective.

Attached: what slav IADS lacks.jpg (576x595, 139K)

It is however our firm conclusion that Russian A2/AD capabilities, while substantial, to date do not create any large, impenetrable bubbles, and maximalist claims regarding their range and precision shrink on closer inspection. While admittedly an imperfect test or comparison, analysis of air operations over Syria likewise suggest that even late-model Russian-manufactured air defence systems are vulnerable to a range of counter-measures, as illustrated by Israel. Beyond individual weapons systems, the study has identified a wide range of possible counter-measures –direct and indirect, passive and active–that can be employed.218 Recognizing this, and further exploiting such vulnerabilities, makes any would-be Russian military adventure in the Baltic states more risky, and thereby less tempting. Hence, Western possession of such counter-A2/AD capabilities should not be considered destabilizing or aggressive, but as an important contribution to regional stability hehe

>mutt propaganda

Do you really trust a western/HATO sources to provide you with accurate analyses of the perfromance of Russian aerial defence technologies? All your targets are and have always been disorganised 3rd world middle easterns with no substantial anti-air warfare doctrines. The very last time that a western force dared to test Russian airspace was the U2 event.

cringe

>cringe

Attached: 1565325253126.png (388x404, 23K)

>allegedly
even national interest knows it bullshit

>allegedly

youtube.com/watch?v=cBmhJ-jrzrc

too many seething euromuslims and amerifats ITT. Time for refreshing imagery

Attached: Су-34-ВВС_России.jpg (1600x1064, 382K)

youtube.com/watch?v=NI0REqlYhmc

Holy shit what the fuck is wrong with that airfield? It looks like they landed in Chicago.

Cold War era Russian concrete and asphalt mixes were notorious for cracking/chunking and causing FOD problems.

Maybe they haven't fixed it

>muttcells in charge of designing engines that are FOD-tolerant

>can't even make proper concrete
>accusing anyone of manufacturing issues
lol go post another national interest article bud

The B-52G has been obsolete for thirty goddamn years. It's still flying because FUCK YOU, that's why, and will keep delivering the mail until 2050 because it's funny to dab on sand people with a bomber five times older then it's commander,

>January 7, 2047. A young man bombing Iran is distracted by wondering if the naked woman in the poster glued to the bulkhead is his grandmother.

Goal post status: moved. Try harder Vatnik

Topkek

*Cracksip* my fellow Moomer. Russia has such a long history of being the Short Bus of Empires, the Worst and Biggest Army, they absolutely rage when they realize that soon those titles will be lost to Poos and Dog Eaters.

In this moment, I understand why a crack dealer's caddy is so important to him. The flare of bling drowns out the glare of decay.

i dont think you know why the B-52 is still in service

Some day Boeing will successfully talk the air force into buying this concept.

Attached: maxresdefault.jpg (1280x720, 137K)

It's cute how the Vatniks always thinking they will archive anything here with that race baiting bullshit.

The A400M can start from everything.