NORMALFAGS
TAKE. THIS.
NORMALFAGS
Nolan Miller
Other urls found in this thread:
drive.google.com
twitter.com
Joshua Reyes
They're taking over there was a thread where some guys were talking about awkward sex and then there was a roastie whore who cheated on her ex boyfriend then ditched him for being too emotional and these people discuss having sex like we all get it the femanons are just ugly whores who with fake mental illnesses and half the guys are just normalfags who enjoy self-pitying this board is on it's last leg
Ian Ortiz
>stupid incel, BACK TO Jow Forums
Carter Gomez
Its not on its last leg user, this is really just a cycle of the internet Jow Forums will be with us for years to come. Do not fret
Brayden Bennett
>implying you could ever win a fight against a normie
Nathan Reyes
can you really confirm this?
i plan to find hope somewhere else
Julian Watson
Tell me this:
What constitutes a normalfag to you and why do you not want those traits on this board?
Cooper Clark
I did win a fight against a normie, got 2 years in prison for GBH
Alexander Parker
You good fren user
Eli James
fighting the good fight user
proud of you
Anthony Howard
IF YOU HAVE TO ASK, YOU ARE ONE. GTFO
Matthew Jackson
rip quad get
but truth nonetheless
Asher Wright
If I am one, you want me off the board. I'll leave if you can explain what's wrong with one. Not that I agree I am one. Which is why I'm asking.
Or if all you want to do is vent instead of having an actual conversation, by all means, keep going at it.
Charles Bell
just look at ^ that formatting
Charles Richardson
No dubs so far
Disgusting
Robert Wilson
nigger. did you go to preschool. you don't know how. to make. a compound sentence. pressing. enter twice. isn't how. you organize. your fucking. thoughts.
Lincoln Wood
Just going to vent instead of giving a sound reason as to why normies ought to begone?
You've had many chances to answer.
Tyler Ward
mindset and behaivor are the obvious ones
now leave
Angel Lewis
Normies get bored of shit easily, Just make this place pretty boring and they will live, Think of a game like DAY-Z, used to be normie infested. now it's fucking dead besides actual people who really enjoy the game.
Ian Hernandez
THIS IS Jow Forums YOU THINK YOUR THE ONLY ONE WHO KNOWS THE RASENGAN?
Jacob Sanders
>what constitutes a normalfag
the ability to socialize whithout coming off as weird or autistic. Having sex.
please, apu let me handle this.
Jason Foster
All robots and all normies have mindsets and behaviour.
By having asked you what constitutes a normie and why it's bad, you'd need to answer what mindset belongs to a normie and why that mindset is bad (and similarly do so for behaviour).
Great job organizing your thoughts, though. I can throw that accusation back at you.
>the ability to socialize whithout coming off as weird or autistic. Having sex.
Okay, and why are any of those bad traits to possess or why are any of those unwanted here?
Jayden Lopez
>Normies get bored of shit easily
they're on the eternal search for memes
they say this so many times it annoys me
Jonathan James
not worth my time
sage
Daniel Martin
because you can't relate to me and you just spout meaningless info.
everywhere else is normietopia.
you aren't even on the same page when it comes to robotism. I have a PDF about normies that i'll link if you want it.
Daniel Price
you are like a yogathot in a Buddhist temple asking why they are doing strange rituals.
Matthew Williams
If I were this "normie" you're speaking about and couldn't relate to you, you're still not answering why the inability to relate to you is inherently bad, nor why I ought to be discouraged from posting here. I speak with people whom I can't relate to all the time. Can you briefly summarize why the ability to socialize well and have sex is bad in and of itself without centering yourself within it?
And sure, I'd love to see the PDF.
I didn't stop anyone from performing the ritualistic equivalent of posting. I'm asking why my posting is inherently bad or gets in the way of theirs, if I even am a normie.
Ian Cooper
>you're still not answering why the inability to relate to you is inherently bad
it's self evident. "omg like why don't you just (bullshit)" Robotism is far to complex for a normie to understand and not be pissed.
>Can you briefly summarize why the ability to socialize well and have sex is bad in and of itself without centering yourself within it?
it contradicts being a robot.
Adrian Turner
>it's self evident
It's self evident that the inability to relate to you is bad when it extends from the ability to socialize or have sex? How is that self evident? I've know people who can't socialize well or have sex and they can still have hour-long conversations with me even though we can't relate on the sex or social parameters. Why is it inherently bad to not be able to relate to someone who is at a disadvantage? You have to clarify yourself.
>it contradicts being a robot
Yes, so why is not being a robot (by being able to socialize and have sex) bad? You still haven't explained.
>drive.google.com
Bookmarking, thanks.
Nicholas Young
checked. Imposter satan.
i wasn't saying there was anything wrong with socializing in itself, but if you do it then you don't belong on this board. Sex on the other hand is inherently "bad" per say but that topic has to deal with anti natalism.
>Yes, so why is not being a robot (by being able to socialize and have sex) bad? You still haven't explained.
most normies are absolute subhuman shitheads. I could talk all night about why they are bad.
oh and be careful with that doc. It's outdated and needs to be updated, i've learned much more about human nature and evolutionary psychology since then.
Jace Peterson
>i wasn't saying there was anything wrong with socializing in itself, but if you do it then you don't belong on this board
If belonging on this board is qualified by not socializing and not having sex, then let's say I don't naturally belong. This thread was advocating people being made to leave just because they are (by your definition) able to socialize and have sex. Then the question becomes: why does a robot consider a conversation ruined upon finding out the other party is capable of having sex or socializing? Seems pretty dumb that just because someone can't mimic your lack of success, any and all ideas discussed amongst each other become automatically uninteresting and that they're never worth the pursuit. Like I said, I have hour-long convos with people very different from me all the time and we vigorously debate, but in the end it's fun and interesting.
>Sex on the other hand is inherently "bad" per say but that topic has to deal with anti natalism.
I think you were talking about the ability to find a sexual partner more than the act itself, but even if we go with what you just said, you don't think sex is bad - you think that which results in reproduction is bad (and I'd actually agree - we don't need more kids in the world).
>most normies are absolute subhuman shitheads. I could talk all night about why they are bad.
I think most people in general are subhuman shitheads/there's no extra virtue someone attains just by inability to socialize or have sex. And talking about why they are bad is fine, but it doesn't result directly from the trait of having the ability to socialize or have sex. The bad values a normie shithead could foster could be harnessed by a robot too. Values matter more than traits in concluding someone's a shithead.
P.S. You're having a perfectly good convo with me and I'm what you consider a normie.
Isaac Roberts
you filthy worms lmao