Chess thread v.2

antichess anyone?

lichess.org/qkD4jHPA

no one will beat me

good game user

lichess.org/VSXavOGO

also good game, anyone else?
lichess.org/CYhNXvvF

anyone else :^)

lichess.org/pqIMv3fC

any other friendos
lichess.org/ugxjsQrk

lichess.org/J0fpM8KM

lets do this

why you leave though
7-0 lets go guys

lichess.org/sEjC9axw

lichess.org/YaCSHBQd

why you keep aborting dog come dude

How many games of chess on Lichess have to be played before they run out of URLs?

lichess.org/moLv7zAC
8-0 let me get to 10 anons

Like, 50. Who knows?

36^8

26 letters in the alphabet + 10 numbers
8 characters per url

lichess.org/dTvA4gFO

come on yall dont be like dat

wait it's even more because I just realized they use lower case as well so it's

((26*2)+10)^8 or
218,340,105,584,896

that's trillion user :O

Good chess youtube channels?
I like ChessNetwork a lot.

lichess.org/eWmjYtVR
last 1
9-0 :^)

I played white in this game with a randie, how did I do?
lichess.org/6rbd6qtQJFXf

>lichess.org/eWmjYtVR
10-0

and holy shit I played a near-perfect game

play me senpai I just challenged you

holy shit how I do I get that breakdown and chart in the analysis?

how did you challenge me, I've been playing anonymously this whole time

pspanks

it's from the lichess link. I just assumed it was you

pspanks is the dude i was playing user

I started to play about a year ago and Im loving chess.. chess is good

Do you guys play in real life too ?

Attached: chessssssssss.jpg (720x960, 84K)

Chess Autist here.

Looks like someone's cheating again :)
Analysis is here:

lichess.org/dTvA4gFO

Also, it's painfully obvious how someone here fucks up a few moves then starts using a chess engine (e.g. nextchessmove.com).

Compare the game above to a game by GM Magnus Carlsen (GM DrDrunkenstein):

lichess.org/VNAKOFoT

Attached: 1520666646919.jpg (1440x1997, 360K)

based autismo

lichess.org/QpPEAw21

That guy is not necessarily cheating friendo, you blundered in move 6 lol

umm black was winning all along in that game

So what? The other guy sucked

not him but, 0 mistakes and inaccuracies is very suspicious

I mean I had 0 mistakes here and 2 innacuracies does that mean I cheated? This guy was also a lot better. I had to force the blunder. The other guy literally lost the game move 6

lichess.org/1ZZYGSDD

also

>comparing your game to a minute game
And they both went berserk. You do realize that cuts your time in half? So they both only had 30 seconds to play. Also, the position was much more complicated than your game was, so much easier to make mistakes. You literally gave hiim the game, you're just shit dude gtfo

I'm not the one playing, and i did this yesterday too:

You do realize that if your end-game moves match the stockfish 9 engine then you're cheating right? A good example is this guy:

lichess.org/@/G-E-R-M-A-N-I-C-U-S

Look at the status of his account and then compare his games. He has around 1-2 inaccuracies and mistakes by the way.

Conclusion: Cheating sucks.

I watch Ricchard and Mortymer.Try beating that.

my contention is that any reasonably skilled player (like 1800 elo+) could have played that game perfectly

lichess.org/VNAKOFoT

The chess analysis is based on Stockfish engine 9, which means it only analyzes the moves and compares them to the one made by Stockfish.

If the Stockfish 9 considers your move as perfect, then that means its the same move the engine is going to take after taking analysis.

This means that if you have a perfect game after taking 13-20 moves, then you're using a chess engine.

not if your opponent is absolutely terrible. i've played perfect games too buddy

Only if its a relatively short game. Otherwise, that means you're cheating. Simple as that.

lichess.org/qa/258/all-about-cheating-questions-and-answers

I used to be a lichess moderator and the amount of cheating on that site is mild compared to those of chess.com