Explain to me why girls during most of history would be attracted to pretty boys and not the guy with the most money or the guy that could protect her kids?
Explain to me why girls during most of history would be attracted to pretty boys and not the guy with the most money or...
Jayden Flores
Ryan Williams
Before the agricultural revolution things like private property and wealth didn't exist. Women today just use it as a proxy for things like social status and virility. Things that mattered to our prehistoric ancestors
Read Sex at dawn for more
Tyler Garcia
>property didn't exist
>read sex at dawn
you no touch, that grugg spear, that grugg woman, grugg get first pick when grugg kill mammoth
Henry Richardson
>property didn't exist
>read sex at dawn
you no touch, that grugg spear, that grugg woman, grugg get first pick when grugg kill mammoth
forgot pic
Gavin Sullivan
Because being "pretty" as in having muscles, hunter eyes and shit correlates heavily with being a good protector. We're naturally attracted to features that are or have been useful.
Also lmao at women making decision with their brains.
Camden Allen
Girls like pretty boys because they are harmless and often times have lots of wealth. Something you'll find is the most attractive people are also quite welathy. They are also quite simple which is good for women because they are stupid. So Shawn Mendes sings a sonf about how his heart hurts and he loves a normal, everyday girl and so every Filipina in the world gets wet to his picture, despite being 5'1", because hes rich and harmless and willing to love them.
Adrian Cruz
OP, look up r/k selection. Choosing mates based on wealth and character etc. is k selection, choosing mates based on dicksize and muscles is r selection. The more civilized races are more k selected and the more savage races are more r selected, but there are r selected Whites and k selected Blacks. Cultures that tolerate promiscuity encourage R selection and cultures that are monogamous encourage K selection.
Kayden Brooks
Prettyboys jawmog most of this board tho
prettyboys are basically good looking men with good jaws that have clear skin, good facial coloring, luscious lips and nice hair, thats basically it
Adrian Moore
>OP, look up r/k selection
subreddit not found??
Hunter Sanchez
because thats not true and women have always gone after high status guys with access to many resources. "pretty guys" are always the image of wealth. After the industrial revolution the wealthy moved out of large cities and into country homes, different forms of exercise developed and it actually became a pastime of the wealthy to care about their health and play sports. That is why women want guys who look like they play sports: because society has been structured to tell us that men who have the time to play sports have the resources to not have to work in the city in some dirty smelly factory. Now, standards are changing again. Women not only want men who look like they play sports, but men who can also demonstrate, in addition to free time spent exercising, that they have the time to engage in luxurious leisurely activities (traveling, eating high end "health" food, partying.) and those who work in todays factory, the office, will spend their savings and time spent outside of work cultivating the facade of this lifestyle.
Asher Foster
its genetics you dumb faggot, we have been reproducing based off of genetics for millions of years. God why is this a thread
Jose Sanchez
sex at dawn is feminist trash disguised as a redpill
>muh bonobos
Luis Johnson
1 in every 16 gooks is his offspring.
He must have god tier genetics then.
Joshua Phillips
Wider frame is good for throwing spears.
Longer legs are better for persistence hunting larger game like deer.
Strong jaw=Sturdy bone structure.
Hooded eyes=Body stores fat in appropriate places
That’s the broscience of it but in reality prettyboys usually exemplify youthfulness and therefore high potential, that’s it.
Camden Rivera
+1 but we men do the same with the technology we have we dont need wide hips or big breasts
Blake Russell
He had power, so yeah maybe it was genetics if you believe in “genetically programmed” broscience eugenics.
Caleb Rivera
yeah, is not like women prefer powerfull rich dudes even if they're ugly.
there must be a historical reason.
wow
Tyler Phillips
This is my goal body
Evan Price
>most of history
Wrong, they've been brainwashed by Hollywood to be attracted to men with soft features. It goes a bit too deep for this board when you realize the existence of Hollywood trannies (female-to-male included).
Before that it was pretty much a correlation between testosterone levels and attractiveness, which a slight bias for height.
John James
Not how it works. Cavewomen have Cavebrothers and Caveuncles. You would get your head bashed in while you slept if you went around raping the women in your small tribe. You had to be a Casanova and convince the women to sleep with you a lot like today
Jonathan Bennett
You're crazy. How is a book that says "women are sluts but that's ok" feminist trash
Elijah Carter
I wish I had a jawline and Hunter eyes fåms
Mason Jenkins
have you ever read the bible?
women were merchandise sold to the biggest rich dude.
Ethan Miller
This.
Jaxson Evans
lmao that's because he was a rapist and could rape whatever woman he wanted with no consequences
all those kids he had weren't consensual in any way
Aiden Richardson
What history?
Thomas Rodriguez
>he doesn't know romance was invented by shakespeare
>women married before for love
ok dumbass.
Jeremiah Perez
Not really. He had something like 30 known kids, but those guys got so much fucking pussy just for being the son of the greatest guy ever that each had hundreds of kids and that fame spread to as much as their grand-grand-grandkids.
Mason Peterson
This was millions of years before the bible. Where you only knew the same 150 people your whole life
Hunter gatherers didn't have any money there was no currency
Joshua Williams
>he thinks wealth in hypergamy species is about money
ok newfag.
Jonathan Morris
Shakespeare didn't "invent" love, he just put what was already there into a medium people could understand and relate to
Joshua Cox
there was no concept of women loving a guy in the bible and loving other was a concept only for guys.
humans aren't a monogamous specie.
male humans love, women can't (they lied to you).
a woman will cheat or drop you for a superior male in an instant.
Colton Young
LOL no he didn't. The things he wrote weren't that original. His first plays were shit on by critics. He just had crazy inside knowledge of the royals/elite, and that's what made it blow up. Which is why many people believe he didn't write his own shit.
>people are interested in teh rich/famous/powerful
Literally all of human history.
Carson Thomas
Shakespeare literally invented the language you're speaking right now.
fucking illiterates.
Camden Collins
The guy with the most money and who could protect her kids was the only guy available who was halfway well fed, and therefore the "pretty boy" relatively speaking.
Humans weren't around millions of years ago, you halfwit.
Logan Stewart
Seriously?
Mason Young
are you stupid or what.this is not a subreddit address
Kevin Bennett
If women didn't instill ravenous competition among men we would of never created civilizations
Oliver Hall
Humans didn't just pop in on earth 200,000 yrs ago. Our hominind ancestors did exist
Nicholas Clark
chimps didn't evolved because they're not hypergamous.
humans being hypergamous is what literally made our inteligence evolve since being smarter paid off for males.
Brody Jenkins
Being a slut is bad, guy. Never reas that book but its garbage if that's what it says.
>Brainwashed by Jews?
>Its more likely than you think.
>.jpg
Austin Evans
It's all for nothing if the protected childs have inferior genetic potential. And a symetric face, clear eyes, clean skin and full hair was the best way to make sure your potential partner is healthy for nearly all of vertebrate evolution. They don't care that much about muscles because if a potential partner was too weak he would have been dead or driven out by a stronger male. That's also why the women never like nice guys meme exist. They like them for providing the security of a group but sexually they can't help but be attracted to the asshole.
We have similar problems, though. Both sexes already often choose a biologically unfitting partner because because they don't / can't let their primal needs win over mind, but having them is far from wrong.
Cooper Wood
Because beauty means symmetric face and that means good genes. Women are drawn to a man who could kill another one.
[i]If two men square off against each other in a fight over a woman and one kills the other outright, there is clearly no point in a woman offering physical resistance to the winner. He did, after all, just kill someone significantly stronger than her, so her physical resistance would accomplish nothing and very likely place her own life in danger. Plus if her current male protector and provider were just killed, she needs a new one as quickly as possible and an objectively “better” male is immediately available and interested in her.[/i]
Jayden Martinez
Are you actually so stupid, that you made a post asking why money does not yield a greater attraction
THAN
FUCKING
GENETICS
Jayden King
>And a symetric face, clear eyes, clean skin and full hair was the best way to make sure your potential partner is healthy for nearly all of vertebrate evolution.
>I have a lazy eye
Oh...th-thanks
Tyler Williams
Nigga i barely have 4% neanderthal dna and im on the high end of that category
You dont have much in common with anything before neanderthal and homo sapiens hell you likely have more in common with some species today than with these ancestors.
John Evans
You confuse attraction with being with someone. Even today, women are not attracted to wealth itself. Most pretty wives of rich guys cheat on the rich older cunts with young studs.
But if you are wealthy and command respect, women are much more likely to be attracted to you. Not to mention you can afford stylish/smart clothing and a lot of fun things, which poor cunts can't.
Joseph Lee
That guy gets mostly gay men on his comment section.
Henry Peterson
>you will never have a haram of sexually promiscuous bonobos
Jackson Sanchez
Humans didn’t have inter-social group violence though, they only killed omegas.
Gavin Gutierrez
bonobos are strongly matriarchal and the only way you are allowed into their orgies is literally if your high status mom invites you
Christopher Cooper
Bent nose, asymetrical eyes, still a fucking cutie
Wtf