Will drugs close the gender gap?

There's only like 1/2 a second difference between men and women average 100m sprint time.
How will future PEDs change the face of sports?

Attached: usain-bolt-dafne-schippers-rio-2016-ftr.jpg (600x750, 369K)

its 1 sec, not 1/2 sec
1 sec is a lot in 100m and the female record is from 1988, if it hasn't been beaten today with the amount of enhancing drugs that exists I dont know how will they do it

0,5 seconds are a lot in 100 m sprints.
But I guess if you give women excessive amounts of roids it could close that gap.

We just need bolt to go trans and claim the record from the women's side

no, the gender gap will stay the same since men will just take the same. that being said, the gender gap really isn't as big as we think, nor does it really matter outside of dick contests like these sports. the average person is an obese shit stain that sits on the couch all day, so male or female would tear the heads off the average normie if they had any proper training.

Drug tests are actually much stricter today than in 1988

It's one second. One second is a lot. At 15 I could do 100m in 11 seconds. The women's world record is 10.49s
Usain did it in 9.58
PEDs probably won't make a difference. Especially if BOTH genders use them.

>that core on Schippers
it's not pretty but shiiiiit

But they would obviously be a physical limit, like the human body will simply not be able to pass a certain level. They could both have the same ceiling, but one just has more to go, to reach that ceiling.

>implying they're not already in peds

have they brainwashed you to the point where you think men and women are physically equal ? ofc the ceiling is different for both of them, they are biologically very different and womens bodies are very unefficient at using anabolics compared to men.

drugs are much more advanced too, if you think anyone at the elite level is natty you're just a delusional fool

unlikely. just the difference in chromosomes xx and xy change the ceilings completely. that being said, the only way the current gender gap would close to negligible levels is if we only fucked the tallest and strongest women and did this over multiple generations to breed even stronger women. but too many men are obsessed with fucking goblins (

there are also drugs that change the state of your system, but once they are done they leave your system and from a medical point of view, it would be very hard to see if its just a genetic freak, someone who trained a lot or if someone used them.

when you're the absolute best of the world its because you're a freak, you trained a lot and you used any medical aid in your hand

every single one in the elite is on drugs, depending on the country they have better or worse but all of them are on

But if you roid the males too it probably wouldnt.
Maybe if you find a women who has the bone and muscle structure of a man, and then roid her she could be just as good as a man. So basically if you find men with a womb.

They all do drugs atm anyways

0.5 seconds is HUGE in a 100m sprint. Jesus, some of you are retarded.

Very true, and I would argue that getting caught in doping is much more about your conections and the sport's power play than your actual medical condition. And ofc, in sports where testing has a fixed date the athlets just use clever cycling to be natty during test day.

Attached: 1526688504346.jpg (1276x716, 143K)

Not the guy you're talking to, but it's not a 'gender gap'. That is just a concept for women to bitch about. In physical activities, males average superiority to females is due to sexual dimorphism.

Exactly.
Hafthor Björnson has peak Strentgh genetics but is also clearly on gear.
Same with Klokov or Eddie Hall.

Is bloatlord natty?

Attached: 1529856329872.jpg (664x463, 55K)

Kek

i mean that is to be assumed. gender gap happens because of genetic differences which is sexual dimorphism

no. a 1 second gap is practically impossible to close, I'd be extremely surprised if a woman ran under 10.30 ever. even with steroids and other drugs it's very unlikely a woman can match or get closer to a man's performance for biomechanical reasons. men are simply adapted to be stronger, quicker, having denser muscles and just have better body proportions for sprinting.

Honestly, I wouldn't be surprised if he was. He's been lifting for a hella long time

women have wide hips which makes it practically impossible. some sort of genetic freak test tube baby with narrow hips and a vagina might be able to though

But these athletes are top level, regardless even if they're women or not, their bodies are more adapted to running than yours. Not every women has wide hips.

wider hips than a top level male athlete dumbass

"lifting for a long time" doesnt matter when he literally has NO form whatsoever