What does this board think of Jack Donovan?

What does this board think of Jack Donovan?

Attached: 71eZM+cXrFL.jpg (893x1360, 207K)

Literally who

what does this guy and/or his book have to do with Jow Forums?

Attached: download (2).jpg (201x251, 8K)

How does masculinity connect with fitness, hmm....

Attached: Mishima-Tribute-2015.jpg (2599x2599, 2.42M)

I know what I think about OP.
(that you're a faggot)

He's a try hard LARPer but he's usually right. The problem he thinks he's breaking new ground by putting what is essentially male instinct into book form. Plus he'll never procreate, so what's the point for him?

> is a "pagan"
> is a proud faggot
yep, it adds up.

Addition: He's too old to be dressing like It's undignified to be pushing into your mid 40's and still dress like your teenage self

LARPing how?

I think this board is proof that it doesn't

Fair enough, I retract my statement

If you need a cringy larper to teach you how to be a man instead of figuring it out by yourself you will never make it.

Have you made it?

In a lot of ways yes and I’m still working on it. It’s ride that never stops.

What ways

>bawww he offended my book now I need to bring him down
you're pathetic mate

I read "the way of men" a few years ago, and I thought it was a pretty good read, although rather long. It could be an article instead of an entire book.
Basically I can sum it up with one sentence: "The way of men is the way of the gang". He advocates that you find a "tribe" of bros, and then improve and help each other within that group. He has a few minor points too, but that was my main takeaway.

Attached: 1530533744369.jpg (386x567, 92K)

How do you offend an inanimate object?

Attached: 1531616484288.gif (320x240, 1.73M)

Have you made it?

Not in the slightest...

Attached: 1529771314811.jpg (437x437, 28K)

read bronze age mindset instead

He's so masculine he transcended to fucking men.

Women are evil, maybe he's on to something

Attached: 1531788857789.jpg (1200x1185, 108K)

Candle jack don-

He's a faggot, that's all you really need to know
Same warped and twisted view of masculinity as Chuck Palahniuk

Chuck Palahniuk's a literal fag, and I do not mean that purely as an expletive, he is actually gay. The masculinity he portrayed indicting Fight Club was a hyperbole of masculinity. A fag writing about undue masculinity is the most untrustworthy shit since Bush.

Like Jack Donovan?

Wow that picture is gay

Great book

The man is a proud homosexual telling us about how to be men and also his book does not feature any ground breaking ideas. The message is to find other men you can form a 'tribe' with ie have close male friends.

Id say follow jocko willink if you want a man that isnt also larping

good book for neck beards and sad young men who can''t spot pathetic books

There are better books to look into

Attached: 1530421532069.png (5000x5000, 1.26M)

what evidence is there that hes gay?

guy who hates women because hes a big gay.

What are the right fucking books?

Attached: maxresdefault (3).jpg (1280x720, 95K)

I know, same as Jack Donovan, that's the point.
A faggot sees fighting as it is portrayed in fight club.
A man sees fighting as it is portrayed in Rocky.

He's not making a secret of it at all. Try googling.

Do you equate all things to pieces of entertainment?

>The masculinity he portrayed indicting Fight Club was a hyperbole of masculinity

you do know that was the entire point, right?

jack donovan is literally homosexual too

he's alright, kinda full of him self but that might be necessary for his edgy death cult. way of men reads like a "laymen's" version of King Warrior Magician Lover.

I have the book. It's OK, but as it is with all things - you can't rely on one source as a base for all your information.

jack donovan is the dr seuss of masculine literature
bronze age pervert, rollo tomassi, the guys who wrote sex at dawn, all far better alternatives than this tryhard shit