Any high IQ autist who can solve this puzzle?
Other urls found in this thread:
I believe the correct answer is I don't know
pretty sure its -5 but not 100% sure
There is no number in the * cell, just a *.
That's what I think too unoriginally
-5
The difference of the two tops rows is the sum of the bottom row digits
For example in the first column 9-6=3; 1+2=3
another one for you. imgur.com
Holy fuck user. How did you do that? How does one even think like that. Another one for you
imgur.com
top tier math skills
It wasn't really math. You got lucky that somehow you saw the digits sum. Else even I have 135 IQ and couldn't solve it. There was no fixed approach and hence no mathematical model could be applied.
i'm not the guy i was complimenting him
I don't solve fucking puzzles, I do useful shit instead.
also there is a mathematical model for it called casting out nines; i didn't think of it before his answer showed up. you should have.
i think it may be 15 or 17 cause i see that on the top that 25 and 62 equal 88 and that 16 and 9 equal 25 but the pattern stops there so im confused
I was gonna say 52 because the difference between the numbers diagonally opposite from one another are all prime numbers, and the difference between 49 and 52 is a prime
but that pattern doesnt really fit because the difference between 25 and 63 isnt a prime
im pretty lost
>You got lucky that somehow you saw the digits sum
Cope. IQ is about pattern recognition, not memorizing models. What a brainlet you are.
>implying great mathematicians are great because they follow predefined methods
wew
I'm a math teacher so I guess you get good at pattern recognition after starting at numbers long enough. No real method I know of.
I'm not quite sure how to explain the solution to this one in writing so I attached a picture. Basically the sum of the sums of the digits in each row gives the number between them. You repeat that process to get 17 in the missing spot.
It's nearly impossible to find that pattern if you haven't been solving similar questions beforehand. Now that I know there exists a type of question where sum of digits can be employed to solve question. Not really pattern matching exists then, does it?
I was doing a similar process but i got hung up on the diagonals
25 + 63 = 88
16 + 9 = 25
technically both of these are correct right?
No, 17 is the correct answer. The other guy's pattern didn't apply across the board.
uh but the other pattern doesnt apply all the way either
Yes it does. You're doing it wrong.
Holy crap thats great, smartanon
That was a good problem because it has so many other leads to follow, but as said the key is finding an algorithm that works in all cases.
I found some bigger paper, hope this helps. ...I have to attach it the next post because I'm laptop and phone posting at the same time like an idiot.
I hate slowly fading pictures captcha.
Nice one, I'm jealous bronon