Everything is oversexualized nowadays. Sex is overglorified and exaggerated. The human mind is amazing when it comes to replicating experiences you never ever tried before in your life. With constant bias from society who only share one viewpoint of sex, it's pretty hard to disregard sex as a virgin. It's always constant on your mind because your peers talk about it a lot. Those same peers tell you it's the greatest thing ever so naturally you'll want some too. These idiots have no different viewpoint. They always say "Sex is so awesome". From normalniggers, to the religious, to the outcasts on imageboards the response is the same.
Yet the disappointment I felt when I first had sex was priceless. I can not believe I hyped myself for something so valueless and pathetic. You can't speak out against "sex" because it is seen as blasphemy. It is the same morons who bully you for not liking coffee. In truth, many people obsess over sex because it is a coping mechanism for their existential crisis. They are losers who have nothing going on for them so they have to make up some petty philosophical statement like "sex is the meaning of life".
You are not missing out on much, robots. Vidya is more fun than sex.
>They are losers who have nothing going on for them so they have to make up some petty philosophical statement like "sex is the meaning of life". >implying that the most objective "purpose of life" isn't reproduction
Regardless, your one bad experience with sex does not make you an expert. The difference between bad sex with a stranger and good sex with someone you love is night and day. I'd much rather masturbate than have bad sex but there's no comparison for great sex with reciprocal love. I'll give you an analogy you'll understand, since you seem like a little manchild:
Pretend you'd never played a video game, but you'd heard all your life about how great they are. Finally, you get to play one game and it turns out to be a really shitty one. Does it make sense for you to then declare that all games are shit and people who claim to enjoy playing them are liars and losers with nothing better to do? Of course not. Go play a great game and you'd realize how wrong you are. Go have great sex and you'll realize how wrong you are.
Daniel Green
>Regardless, your one bad experience with sex does not make you an expert.
This is a coping mechanism. Always there has to be an excuse as to why people don't enjoy it.
>Have sex >Think it's lame >Well you didn't have good sex >Have good sex >Still think it's lame >Well you didn't do it with someone you love >Do it with someone I liked a lot >Still thought it was lame >W-well hmmm
Always everytime. It never fascinates me how much people will come up with these excuses and never think rationally. There is a reason why only humans and dolphins procreate for pleasure while other animals do for reproduction. Sex is lame compared to the oversexualized media of it. It could said than pornography is a lot more stimulus than sex.
>Finally, you get to play one game and it turns out to be a really shitty one.
That's a really a fallcious argument and only proves my point. There are a lot of shit games that are popular due to peer opinion, just like the music industry. Take Fortnite for example. A very simple mediocre game yet everyone pretends to love it and never stops playing it 24/7. People won't shut up about it. Sex is exactly the same thing. Sorry, but there are rational people out there who see things beyond sex. There is a reason why the greatest intellectuals abstained from it while the normalniggers indulged in it.
Lucas Phillips
>There is a reason why only humans and dolphins procreate for pleasure while other animals do for reproduction. This is not even remotely true, you utter brainlet. Every ape procreates for pleasure, masturbates, etc. Male ducks will rape other male ducks. Sea lions are known to pin down penguins and literally fuck them to death. Even if the animal kingdom wasn't filled with examples of animals having sex for non-reproductive purposes, that still doesn't mean that sex and the drive for reproduction isn't the primary force behind all life. Go watch a nature documentary sometime, you pleb. Animals go to absurd lengths, regularly risking and often sacrificing their lives just to get a shot at reproduction.
And no, it's not a "coping mechanism", you little armchair faggot. Sex is the most potent natural method of achieving pleasure. This is plain scientific fact and if you don't enjoy sex, the problem is YOU. Outside of man made drugs, nothing else will give you the same levels of concentrated pleasure and dopamine response as sex. If you don't enjoy it then it's because of your own weird hangups and defective brain because it's literally the best thing you can naturally feel.
>A very simple mediocre game yet everyone pretends to love it and never stops playing it 24/7. So here we identify the real problem: you're unironically autistic and lack the normal human empathy that would allow you to understand that other people have different opinions and tastes than you and can honestly enjoy things that you find uninteresting. I'm not memeing here. If you actually think that people who like things that you don't like are just "pretending to love it" then you are literally autistic.
Grayson Rogers
Idiot, animals don't even know what reproduction is. They just do what comes into their stupid heads.
Andrew Howard
>Every ape masturbates, etc.
Only in captivity
>Male ducks will rape other male ducks. Sea lions are known to pin down penguins and literally fuck them to death. Even if the animal kingdom wasn't filled with examples of animals having sex for non-reproductive purposes, that still doesn't mean that sex and the drive for reproduction isn't the primary force behind all life.
So my way to the top of the food chain, create fire, survive the brink of extinction during the ice age, domesticate and artificially select animals and plants for agriculture, create cultures, languages, and religions, wage wars, make empires, create the written word and numerical systems, write epics, create artistic wonders, devise banking and currency, make exponential technological and scientific leaps in just the past 2000 years, land on the moon, and create an information technology-linked global economy was all because humans want sex. That's really a dumb argument.
Also, there is a reason why humans restricted sex in past civilizations. Too much of it kills productivity but I'm sure a psuedo intellectual like you knows that already.
>Sex is the most potent natural method of achieving pleasure. This is plain scientific fact and if you don't enjoy sex, the problem is YOU. >If you don't like what I like then the problem is YOU
Normalniggers, everyone. Also subhumans tend to lack control over their sexual instinct so I wouldn't be surprised if you were a nigger too.
>you're unironically autistic and lack the normal human empathy that would allow you to understand that other people have different opinions
Nice projection yet terrible argument. Yep I won this one. Too easy.
Matthew Gutierrez
Did the animals tell you that themselves?
Evan Kelly
Git gud at sex and do it with sombody that is good at it. Fall in love with each other.
Pure bliss.
Cameron Russell
>Nice projection yet terrible argument. Yep I won this one. Too easy. If that right there didn't confirm your autism, I can also point to the fact that I forgot I had this tab open, decided to respond anyway 30 minutes after the last post, and you've been sitting here the whole frantically smashing that refresh and responded to me as fast as you could. Sad.
>So my way to the top of the food chain in order to more safely reproduce >create fire in order to more safely reproduce >survive the brink of extinction during the ice age because the drive to reproduce is so strong >domesticate and artificially select animals and plants for agriculture are you dumb? easier food supply = easier to reproduce >create cultures nobody intentionally "creates" cultures but regardless, human culture only developed because people gathered together to, guess what, reproduce >languages reproduction = the highest and most important form of communication >religions in order to attempt to control who reproduces >wage wars the most obvious example here. people go to war to expand their territories to spread their people to - via reproduction >make empires again, completely impossible for any empire to spread without a positive birthrate >everything else Yes, yes, yes and yes. Sex is the core driver for virtually all human achievement. Luckily, your opinion on this matter is not only worthless but will literally cease to exist the second you die. Meanwhile, mine will live on through my children and my descendents will still be walking around, creating and perpetuating all those great human achievements you love so much, while you're rotting in the ground because you're such a little fedora edgelord that you think that you've risen above it all or something.
Luis Torres
>If that right there didn't confirm your autism, I can also point to the fact that I forgot I had this tab open, decided to respond anyway 30 minutes after the last post,
No I'm sure you struggled on coming up with a reply and are only now making an excuse as to why you took so long. No need to lie, I know.
>Everything has to do with reproduction
Now this is how I know you're an oversexualized mongrel with no common sense. The past human achievements weren't created soley for reproduction. That is like saying we created all of those achievements because there is a built in instinct for every organism to feed and to obtain energy in some way therefore eating is the meaning of life. Completely fallcious.
>Meanwhile, mine will live on through my children and my descendents will still be walking around, creating and perpetuating all those great human achievements
Except you have yet to have children. You have not successfully reproduced therefore the rest of your post is invalid. Try again. Too easy.
Matthew Howard
The two guys arguing here would fare better if they just agreed that they have two different but valid points of view. Personally, I believe that all this noise around men and women and "improve yourself" and the myriad of other bullshit just so you can have casual sex is very lame and nihilistic. It's not a proper end goal. But lots of people disagree with me, and for them, that end goal is good enough.
Gabriel Sanchez
After I bust a nut you're completely right even if I thought something totally different than that wall of text.
Isaiah Smith
It's just people following their instincts as apes and their need to reproduce. Can't blame them for making it such a big deal, it's our entire biological purpose.
Jackson Bell
>Except you have yet to have children. You have not successfully reproduced therefore the rest of your post is invalid. Sorry buddy, I'm 33 years old with 2 kids.
So far all you've done is put this vague "I'm so superior to you silly people who enjoy enjoyable sensations" but you have yet to offer any real content in your posts. You're just repeating these verbose versions of "no ur wrong". If the desire to reproduce isn't the primary drive for all life then what is? What's the point of all these "achievements" if there's no one to carry them on?
If everyone agreed with you and rose above dumb mongrel behavior like sex and reproduction then humans would very quickly go extinct. What's the point of all your fedora religious baggage (much science, muh technological progress, muh moon landing, etc) when humanity no longer exists? You're arguing my point for me and you don't even realize it. Your "progress" is meaningless without future generations to inherit it and improve upon it.
Mason Lewis
>Sorry buddy, I'm 33 years old with 2 kids
33 years old and a virgin. Gotcha.
>So far all you've done is put this vague "I'm so superior to you silly peop... a bloo bloo bloo im right you're wrong
I guess we're done here.
Dylan Johnson
There's nothing valid about "nobody actually enjoys sex, they just pretend to like it because of peer pressure or something and you'll be a lot happier if you stop seeking human companionship." Every scientific study of human happiness ever done places sex and romantic partnership near or at the top of the list of things essential to basic human happiness. This fedora shit about how we need to transcend the need for human companionship and stop having children to carry on our species and our society is beyond stupid and sounds like something I would have said when I was in the middle of my edgy teenager phase.
Also, you'll never get anywhere in life if you go around telling yourself that people who have opinions in direct opposition to your own have "valid points of view". This is the quickest way to turn yourself into a huge pussified doormat.
Kevin Cooper
>Also, you'll never get anywhere in life if you go around telling yourself that people who have opinions in direct opposition to your own have valid points
It's called being a mature adult. Now I know you're underaged.
Bentley Nelson
>I guess we're done here. Aww, how cute. About what I expected, though. Isn't it funny how you can spend nearly two hours in your thread posting the same vague nonsense over and over again but as soon as someone asks you to share your own viewpoint rather than simply telling everyone else that they're wrong, you run away?
But again, not really a surprise. Your type always tend to be cowards. I'll ask you again though, maybe you'll find the balls to give a real reply instead of running away:
>If the desire to reproduce isn't the primary drive for all life then what is? What's the point of all these "achievements" if there's no one to carry them on? What's the point of all your fedora religious baggage when humanity no longer exists? Your "progress" is meaningless without future generations to inherit it and improve upon it.
Liam Ross
>So here we identify the real problem: you're unironically autistic and lack the normal human empathy that would allow you to understand that other people have different opinions and tastes than you and can honestly enjoy things that you find uninteresting. >Spergs out on anons who do not like sex
Again, I'm 33 years old. There are some topics on which opposing viewpoints can be equally valid but they are very few and far between. There is right and there is wrong and I know it makes you very uncomfortable to realize that you have to make a choice and that choice can potentially be the wrong one, and I know it's comforting to imagine that everyone can choose to believe whatever they want and no one will be wrong because everyone's opinion is "equally valid", but that's not how it works in the real world.
Why would you even hold any opinions at all if you're so lacking in conviction that you think that every other possible opinion is just as correct and valid as your own? This is the sort of worldview I'd expect from a slug or a sea sponge, not from a human being.
Also, a tip for the next time you try to argue with someone smarter than you: you're only making yourself look like a fool when you consistently offer no real rebuttal and fall back on personal attacks over and over again. It's especially silly when I'm sitting here and know perfectly well how old I am and how many kids I have. I honestly feel bad for you when you seem incapable of addressing my arguments on their merits. You're not going to hurt my feelings or make me doubt my positions by calling me underage or telling me that I don't have kids. It's moronic.
You can either address people's ideas based on the content of their posts or you can put yourself on display as a pure brainlet. Your call.
Evan King
Quite true Sex is icky and gross looking. Will only have it for the sole purpose of reproduction
Hudson Davis
What is this, autism round two? It's not about him not liking sex, it's about him claiming that no one likes sex and everyone who claims to enjoy it is just lying because society peer pressures them into acting like they enjoy it.
It is literally >I don't like thing therefore no one else could possibly like thing and anyone who says they like thing is lying
Benjamin Brown
Maybe those achievements were done because the inventors did it out of necessaity and not out of sex, you perverted moron.
>struggles againt natural predators because man's body was not built with sharp claws or other murder tools >attaches a sharp rock to a stick to gain a sharp killing tool, and to gain a range advantage >later figures out that he can throw the stick to get even more range >can't run as fast as a mammoth or bison >starts casually walking after the animal he's hunting >catches up eventually, kills the tired animal while it's sleeping, or after it's completely forgotten about him >wants to go fast >punches a horse and straps himself to it >man on the other side of the world figures out that he can protect himself by strapping metal and wood and shit to himself >reportedly screams "I'm fucking invincible" >other man figures out that he can just stab the softy bits, later figures out tools to punch through said armor >wants to shut his bitch up and wear silken underwear >discovers a way to china to secure silk >some kebabs interfere with this shit >glass them and their goat with the medieval equivalent of the nuke >figures out that he can launch metal objects by exploding gunpowder behind them in a tube >this revolutionizes warfare and architecture >figures out that horses are slow faggots >goes faster by blowing up decomposed dinosaurs in a steel box >figures out that he wants to go even faster, and that faggot birds can't beat him >flies through the air with the help of exploding dinosaurs >calls the postman a faggot and invents a way to communicate through invisible waves in the air >has a little scuffle, half the population of Europe dies
cont.
Jace Baker
>has another little scuffle, some slanty eyed yellow faggots try to butt in >man splits the atom and creates another sun above Hiroshima (also jumpstarts the creation of anime) >does it again, just for the fuck of it >not too long after that, man creates his crowning achievement >a network connecting more or less all of the parts of the world that matter, and enabling them to communicate and share information in a split second >also stores an infinite amount of information, guides, books, data of all kinds on this network, easily accessible to anyone willing to look >this network allows people to play videogames together >also allows fags to discuss anime, kickstarting the return of national socialism >this network allows me to tell you, right now, to get out of my face, if you don't think this is the most rad shit ever, even though I've never met you, will probably never meet you, and live thousands of kilometers away
...But no everything has to be because of sex. We went to the moon because of sex. We bombed hiroshima because of sex. Please embarassing yourself.
Jacob Rivera
>it's about him claiming that no one likes sex and everyone who claims to enjoy it is just lying because society peer pressures them into acting like they enjoy it.
I never said no one likes sex. Jesus Christ do you lack reading comprehension skills? You probably do from mouthbreathing too much.
Grayson Green
I'm 34 years old and what you just said is completely wrong. Of course there can be valid competing viewpoints because everyone experiences the world in their own way. "There is right and there is wrong" is the kind of simplistic shit we teach to 3 year olds.
Adam Brooks
>the internet is mankind's crowning achievement Just when you think you've reached max fedora, they find a way to surprise you.
That's a real cute little story you wrote me but you're still just doing the same thing you've done all thread. I'm not asking you a complicated question here. If you come up with another round of rambling nonsense in response to this post then I'm going to be forced to assume that you're retarded and ignore you. Maybe the problem here is that there are too many words and they're confusing you? Here, I'll shorten it for you:
>If the desire to reproduce isn't the primary drive for all life then what is? What's the point of all these "achievements" if there's no one to carry them on?
Last chance to impress the class, bucko. Don't let me down.
Jeremiah Ramirez
>If the desire to reproduce isn't the primary drive for all life then what is? What's the point of all these "achievements" if there's no one to carry them on >A BLOO BLOO ITS NOT THE ANSWER IM LOOKING FOR
Is your life really that lame that you can't find purpose for yourself? Reflect back at your replies and think what you have said in the past hour. Lots of fallacies and no convincing arguments. Like I said, I already won. Also, it's pretty embarrassing of you still acting like a child at 33. Millennials... not even once.
Nathaniel Thompson
>lying on Jow Forums in your own thread where your own posts can be linked to prove you wrong Why do people do this? >Jesus Christ do you lack reading comprehension skills? I dunno, why don't we look at your posts together and we'll see which one of us is lacking in reading comprehension: >A very simple mediocre game yet everyone pretends to love it and never stops playing it 24/7. People won't shut up about it. Sex is exactly the same thing. >everyone pretends to love it >sex is exactly the same thing This is you literally saying "everyone pretends to love sex". If everyone is pretending to love it then no one actually loves it, yes? Ok, glad we cleared that up.
>Of course there can be valid competing viewpoints because everyone experiences the world in their own way What a sad, beta thing to say. Tell you what, how about you give me some examples of situations in which this would be the case (equally valid competing viewpoints due to difference world experience) and I'll tell you the exact ways in which you're wrong.
I realize I'm calling you sad a lot but it really is sad that you equate maturity with developing a complete lack of confidence in your own beliefs and opinions. Maturity is the exact opposite: developing a sense of surety and firmness in your own world view and belief system.
Levi Hall
Why the fuck is there some pro-sex guy really angry in this thread, what is the meaning of this
Josiah Jones
I agree with op, as far as vaginal sex goes. fucking buttholes is deathgrip tight, my man, makes fucking pussy seem like opening a door and fucking the corridoor, kek.
Luke Russell
I've given you my opinion on the matter repeatedly. I'm not asking for yours because I need you to tell me what the purpose of life is. I'm asking you because you seem very sure that you know what the purpose ISN'T, but you have yet to tell us what you think the purpose IS. I don't care what answer you give me, I just want to see you give an answer. You haven't done so yet and I guess at this point I'm going to have to assume that you're incapable of giving one. You have this massive anger at the thought of sex being the "meaning" of life but you stop there - you've never given any thought to what else could fill that space if sex is the wrong answer.
It's a very simple question: what do you, personally, believe is the primary drive for all life? If you can't even give a straight answer to this question then you have no place telling other people that their answers are wrong. Anyway, this is your last (you), hope you enjoy it.
Jose Taylor
I've thought about this before. I've made the comparison with alcohol; normies rant and rave about how AMAZING being drunk is and when you get down to it, it's not that big of a deal. It's a meme. Sex feels pretty good, but there's better ways to spend your time. >Peepee feel good That's about the extent of most guys thoughts on sex. I won't even get into woman's pleasure from it since that seems to be some horrifying glimpse into their inner psychology, more based around being dominated and ravaged than anything else. Either way, casual sex is not some transcendent all encompassing thing that needs to be experienced. It is maybe a step or two beyond "peepee feel good". In the context of a relationship I have personally never had this incredible "you actually like them" sex, it's still pretty much going through the motions. It's a meme. It feels good but it's a meme. I struggle really hard with it because I go through manic phases where all I want is sex and then when I get it with my gf it's like oh yeah this is just a meme.
Nathan Green
Are you this 2-dimensional? Recognising another's opinion as valid doesn't mean you have to agree with it. A child in Afghanistan who's parents have been killed in a US drone strike has a LEGITIMATE reason to hate the US. By recognising that, does that mean I, with completely different life experiences, also hate the US? Obviously no. Im stopping here because I think u might have mental development issues.
Aaron James
In the aspect that it is overrated like sex. It's not that hard to grasp.
People have different reasons for the meaning of life.
While sex is not necessary for surival you say that it is very present in human society so it is the meaning of life. I can think of a number of things that are very present in human society and that people may find great joy and meaning in. Religion is the biggest example. I'd say the existence of nuns, priests, pastors, monks and other people who devote their entire lives to their religion(while most abstain from sex) gives better evidence that religion is the meaning of life. Other things that are very present in human society are natural disasters(tornadoes, earthquakes) or war. Just because something is present in society and people may find joy in it does not make it the meaning of life. This includes sex.
Anyways, are you done sperging?
Bentley Martinez
Yeah, it's personal between different people, and value comes from where we make it. Normalfags just are so easily influenced by what other people are saying and doing, and form a difficulty with forming their own approach to it, as a result. If someone was unconcerned with what normalfags say and believe, a robot could easily find great value and comfort in a genuine waifu relationship, for example.
Jonathan Young
>A child in Afghanistan who's parents have been killed in a US drone strike has a LEGITIMATE reason to hate the US. By recognising that, does that mean I, with completely different life experiences, also hate the US? False dichotomy, kid. Hate is not an opinion or a viewpoint. It is an emotion. In this situation, the kid thinks that the US was wrong to kill his parents. The correct viewpoint is that yes, the US was indeed wrong to kill his parents. If you think that the US was right in killing his parents then you are wrong.
See how that works? Now come on, surely you have more than one example, right? I don't want this hypothetical shit. I want one of your own, personal viewpoints. Tell me one of your personal opinions and tell me the completely opposing viewpoint which you still believe is just as valid as your own. This is the example I want you to provide and I really don't think you'll be able to do it.
Camden Stewart
>Hate is not an opinion or a viewpoint. It is an emotion. >Facts can't drive hate
sex is gay, i can literally just jerk off and feel the same. I like making out though
Oliver Stewart
>I, with completely different life experiences, also hate the US? You should though, faggot
Xavier Jones
You don't "live on" through your children you cretin, you'll be rotting in the same ground he will when the time comes, kek.
Joshua Hernandez
>What's the point of all these "achievements" Self actualization. We're different from animals in a way that we can choose not to be animals and from there an entirely alien world awaits us, a world each person has to explore on their own. The world of self consciousness, comprehension, reflection and self reflection. People being shallow and ignoring it throughout their lives and acting like animals only on their impulse is why the "mid-life crisis" exists. Suddenly all those things that made you a wild animal have receded and you realize that you still have a sense of selfe, but no longer any means of actualizing that self beyond the animalistic. When it hits you, it'll be a riot.
Benjamin Price
Are we really playing this game now? I addressed the facts of the situation: the kid feels wrong by the US and hates them as a result. If the kid believed that the US was right in killing his parents, he wouldnt hate the US for doing so. He hates them because he thinks they've wronged him.
One guy who hates the US and one guy who loves it are holding different and conflicting emotions regarding the US but we can't address these objectively. What we can address are the reasons for those emotions, because every emotion has an underlying cause. We can look at why the first guy hates the US and decide whether he's justified in his hate based on his reasoning, and we can do the same for the guy who loves it. Similarly for this hypothetical kid, we can look at the events which caused his hate and decide whether the US was right or wrong.
Emotion is not a valid point for discussions like this. You could make perfectly valid arguments to the effect that yes, the US was in the wrong but the kid is wrong to hate the US because hate will stress him out and give him a less happy life than if he could get over it. It's pointless. We're talking about concrete, objective opinions and viewpoints, not fucking >Sally loves the color red but Susan hates it therefore people can have opposing but equally valid viewpoints regarding nuclear proliferation It's fucking stupid and you really need to stop trying to weasel out of this. Either provide the example I asked for or fuck off. It's too late at night for me to waste time on brainlets who want to play these little semantic games in order to avoid offering an honest debate. Why are all you fuckers so slimy lately?
Adrian Howard
>copies of my genes will still exist on this planet centuries from now >his will vanish forever when he dies >You don't "live on" through your children No wonder the West is collapsing. You sad little white boys are actively rejecting the literal basis of all civilization.
Kayden Watson
And it's a non-white too, well that had to be expected.
Jayden Ward
What if the child's parents were terrorists actively plotting a mass- casualty attack in the US? Was it still wrong for the US to kill them?
A more benign example. Person A was raised by his parents to believe that the consumption of alcohol was wrong. Person B was raised by parents who enjoy a glass of wine. Person A thinks alcohol is wrong, person B does not. Who is right and who is wrong?
Lincoln Ross
>when whites will be a minority in literally every single historically white nation by the end of the century and white guys respond to this by arguing really hard against reproduction for themselves Hilarious. This is kind of the same argument, you know? Not only will my genes outlive yours but your home will also be filled with people that look like me, not you. These are the rewards you get for being a little edgelord fedora, I guess.
Chase Ortiz
Nuclear proliferation can be argued as the main reason we haven't had anther world war. Is it therefore wrong or right?
The point is, you incredible moron, is that almost every issue can be seen in a number of ways. To address the point of this thread head- on: some people believe the point of life is reproduction. Some people believe the point of life is enlightenment, or pleasure, or altruism, or don't believe there is a point at all. If we were hard-wired to believe that reproduction is all there its to life everyone would have as many babies as they possibly could. This is objectively not happening. In fact, the richer and more educated countries have a declining birth-rate. Is everyone else wrong and you are right? Your argument boils down to - this is what I think and so everyone else should think that too. Very poor.
Jordan Hall
>What if the child's parents were terrorists actively plotting a mass- casualty attack in the US? Was it still wrong for the US to kill them? If they actually had the means and ability to carry out this attack then no, the US was correct in killing them.
>Who is right and who is wrong? It depends on their reasoning for their positions. Why does A believe alcohol is "wrong"? Morally wrong? Wrong because it's unhealthy? Some other reason? Saying "alcohol is wrong" without any other context is closer to an emotion than a reasoned viewpoint.
Example 1: A's parents were strict protestants and they taught him that consuming alcohol is morally wrong. In this instance, he would be wrong. Consuming alcohol is not morally wrong.
Example 2: A's parents were doctors and they taught him that alcohol is carcinogenic and consuming it is wrong because even small amounts will increase your cancer risk. In this instance, he would be right. Alcohol is carcinogenic and does increase cancer risk in even small amounts.
Aaron Morales
I like it how your monkey-mind thinks that this is some sort of victory, when your descendants will live in utter poverty and eventually the entirety of mankind will die out because you lack the abstract thought required to maintain what the whites will have left you. But keep on jerking off that inferiority complex I guess.
Cooper Long
And now you claim to be the authority on moral issues?! Incredible. Millions of people believe that consuming alcohol is morally wrong. Or even banned by God. Is your arrogance so great that u can dismiss everyone's opinions by just going "no, alcohol is not morally wrong". There are no black and whites you fool.
Ian Bennett
>Nuclear proliferation can be argued as the main reason we haven't had anther world war. Is it therefore wrong or right? It's wrong because it will inevitably lead to either a far more destructive war, will fall into the hands of terrorists, etc. It has not prevented war, it has just shifted the burden of war from first world nations to second and third world nations which suffer constantly via the endless proxy wars being waged in lieu of traditional war.
>The point is, you incredible moron, is that almost every issue can be seen in a number of ways. I never disagreed. I just said that in nearly every case, all of those ways except one are wrong.
>Is everyone else wrong and you are right? No, everyone else who agrees with me is also right. How could it be otherwise? Do you honestly not believe that your own opinions are correct? All you're doing is giving me endless hypothetical and theoretical situations.
I don't think you actually believe your own bullshit. If you did, you'd be able to provide the example I asked for >Tell me one of your personal opinions and tell me the completely opposing viewpoint which you still believe is just as valid as your own. Not a hypothetical situation. Something you personally believe is right while simultaneously believing that the people who hold the completely opposing viewpoint are just as right as you are. If you can't provide this example then you're going to have to admit that this is just very elaborate virtue signalling on your part.
Wyatt Myers
>And now you claim to be the authority on moral issues?! Yes.
>Millions of people believe that consuming alcohol is morally wrong. And millions more disagree. They're not both right.
>Or even banned by God. If there is a God, I assure you he's not concerned with anything so petty as whether or not people drink alcohol.
>Is your arrogance so great that u can dismiss everyone's opinions by just going "no, alcohol is not morally wrong" Yes.
>There are no black and whites you fool. Virtually everything is black and white and it's the mark of a weak and cowardly mind to think otherwise. If you're a man, you'll decide what you believe, make sure it's right, and hold to it regardless of anyone who disagrees. To do otherwise makes you a coward at best.
How pathetic is it that you're so lacking in confidence and conviction that you're actually scared to say, "This is my belief and it is the correct belief. People who believe otherwise are wrong." What are you so scared of?
Noah Cox
>Exhibit A: while the white man's race goes extinct, he spends his time fighting on the internet and convincing other white men that reproduction is pointless. You want to be replaced so badly, don't you? We're basically doing you a favor at this point.
Matthew Kelly
I agree that everything is oversexualised and the act of sex is overglorified but that doesn't mean sex isn't awesome and we should stop having sex because society is increasingly becoming oversexualised, hell no. Sex is meaningful to life, without sex we wouldn't exist and neither would the society around us exist.
The only issue today is that with oversexualisation the act of sex has become more recreational like something to do when we are bored, lonely or depressed instead of something we do reproduce. That's what sex is all about, reproduction. The act of sex in itself is only supposed to take 2 minutes, if you're a male and cum within a couple of minutes during sex, congratulations you have a healthy, normal functioning penis. Our society claims that's a sexual dysfunction and shame us for it because our society strives towards equality however the reality of sex is that it empowers the man more and the man has more power to control the act of sex and its duration, our society hates that shit because it simply is not equal because it takes us 2 minutes to bust a nut and 12 minutes+ for a women to cum, thus the duration of sex needs to be increased longer than what sex should initially be.
