It wasn't "genetics" your parents were BAMBOOZLED

But do you have super powers?
Say, plant tendrils growing out of your back so you can wine whip like bulbasaur

>carnoid

Attached: image.jpg (1348x812, 170K)

Yeah pretty much brio

i do those things anyway
5'07 shortest male in my family

>drink onions in my childhood along with other meat products
>turn out normal and healthy with a non deformed body

my genes overrid the bean jew

>Infants on onions formula receive the estrogen equivalent of 5 birth control pills a day

bullshit

>parents throw a shitfit whenever i drink more than a glass of any soft drink
>constantly keep telling me to drink more soimilk
>once had to spend 5 minutes telling them i don't want to drink it before i was allowed to leave the kitchen

>parents always trying to pressure me to eat grains
>learned that grains aren't even healthy many years ago from basic paleo
>find out about persorption, and how starch absorbs through the intestinal wall and wreaks havoc
>mention Gerhard Volkheimer's work on persorption, show them the research published in the research journals
>they are visibly upset

why do my parents get angry when i try to discuss research by scientists? they just want to bully me into eating certain foods. i'm a physically weak manlet, they forced me to run cross country all throughout high school adn i was 135lbs couldn't even bench the bar at first i had to lift for months starting age 18 just to achieve a typical level of male strength determined by amerifat standards

more about persorption, if anyone cares about learning how to eat:
i eat food every day multiple times, so i'm trying to at least be an expert on nutrition, even if it makes my parents absolutely livid

functionalps.com/blog/2011/10/22/3169/

you should get real sugar pepsi & tell them about how sucrose has a lower glycemic index than starch, and thus is less fattening

Blaming onions for your retardation and lack of masculine virtue is on the same level as retarded white soccer moms blaming their child's autism on the vaccines. It's nonsense that you only see because you feel their must be a reason for it, a reason outside of your own failings.

Man the fuck up, bitchtits.

so you think breastfeeding isn't important?

I never said that. Check your reading glasses.

This nigga drinking beans!

i was never breastfed because my mom literally thought formula was better she still insists that it is

Breastfeeding is important. But what is the point in making a scapegoat out of onions because your mother was a mouthbreathing retard?

>tfw rheumatism as a kid and didn't consume that shit
Yuhhhh

yeah i'm just pretending that my pre-pubertal male breast growth was a result of LACK OF EFFORT when i was 8 years old

even in middle school i had prostate problems, it would take me a minute to piss

BTW i always did sports. i was on the soccer team, then my parents forced me to do basketball, then they forced me to do wrestling

Show me the first piece of good, scientific, peer reviewed evidence that points to onions causing gynecomastia.

My condolences senpai. Maybe I just have a healthier outlook because I'm 6'1".

tell me what caused it? i had the gyno gene?

Just because you don't know what caused your gynecomastia doesn't mean that you can point to anything you want as a cause. If you're going to assert that it was the onions, you ought to have a good reason for making that assertion.

>i had the gyno gene?
That isn't too much of a stretch.

Yes yeah we should! Being 5'5 is like a hellhole and these Goya aren't even the real jews

it wasn't just the onions milk infant formula, it was the lack of breast feeding as a result of my mom being conditioned to believe that feeding me onions milk formula was a healthier choice

nobody else in my family had it, i guess my mom had an affair with some super short, bald guy with gyno

gyno comes from you being a fatfuck
know what gave you that
all that excess fat you had from throwing tantrums when mom didn't give you soda or chocolate
fat is the real cause of your low-t high-e

Can you point me to a good, scientific, peer reviewed source that a lack of breastfeeding is related to gynecomatia? If not, we're right back where we were a moment ago.

If you want to make complaints about formula companies, I'm right there with you. Nestle has ruined the health of a generation of children in Africa by convincing the poorest of the world that formula is better for their children. But hate them for the things they've actually done, rather than scapegoating them with your own problems.

>gyno comes from you being a fatfuck
i wasn't very fat in middle school though, in fact i got down to 135lbs in high school (at 5'7) -- the only fat really was on my tits and lower belly

>all that excess fat you had from throwing tantrums when mom didn't give you soda or chocolate
you make a lot of assumptions. i didn't get to choose anything i ate, and my parents basically put me on a very high whole grain diet

can you point me to a good, scientific, peer reviewed source that proves you're not a paid shill for the onions bean companies?

if not, fuck off. my older brother has always been fatter than me, but he is also 6'4 and never had bitchtits like me. i'm actually not even fat, right now i'm 140lbs at 5'7 i've been lifitng for 2 years but i still have bitch tits despite vascularity in my arms

it's not entirely your fault, obviously. Sugar is very addictive to the point some scientists wanted it to be taxed as a drug

but you have this problem now and blaming it or finding out what caused it won't make it go away, it's simple as that. it sucks, but it is there and there is a single way to remove it: surgery.

>Sugar is very addictive to the point some scientists wanted it to be taxed as a drug
that's fucking stupid. sucrose isn't even inherently bad.

sugar isn't as addictive as protein, or water, or oxygen.

any "scientist" who wants to tax a macronutrient needs to be lined up against the wall and shot

starch has a higher GI than sucrose, which is why it is more likely to promote diabeetus

if anything should be taxes it's high fructose kike syrup, which has 4.5x as many calories as the label says and many of them in the form of starch-like molecules. if they used SUCROSE instead, soda wouldn't really be fattening.

fat, not sugar, is fattening. sugar tastes fine alone but starch needs fat to not taste terrible.

eat a potato, rice, or pasta without any fats

You know, I like onions well enough. They're a vital component for salisbury steak, for example. They're decent enough on burgers. Really, they go in just about anything with ground beef. I don't eat them on their own that much, but I probably use more onion powder than the average person.

If you have no evidence for your assertion, than your making a wild guess. I can't stop you from being angry at the world and its unfairness, or stop you from being wrong. Do as you please with your life and all that. And I can't give you an explanation as to why you were the unlucky one who developed bitchtits. I am not medical doctor, and I wouldn't feel comfortable giving a diagnosis over the internet even if I was.

But I would advise that you put some honest-to-god critical thought to your conclusions and stop making a fool out of yourself.

I hope you find a resolution for your problem, user.

Yeah it's true. I wish I could go back and change things. Doctors told my parents I needed to eat salads to "stay thin" (high carb, low protein diet) ignoring leaness of thin mass, so I grew up underfed and frail. I'm done growing and no amount of dieting will change my bone structure. Meanwhile all the Chads at my school grew up eating meat and drinking milk and grew up strong and wide.

Early childhood nutrition is key. This is how the Mongols beat the Chinese despite being outnumbered 20 to 1. Chinese peasants grew up eating grains and grew up thin and frail, they couldn't stand up to Mongol warriors raised on a high protein diet

You are deeply unintelligent, and there's no way to fix that over the internet. Consider suicide as the easiest way out.

If you think you can't get fat from anything other than fat, you fundamentally misunderstand nutrition and there's clearly no reason in saying anything else to you.

>If you think you can't get fat from anything other than fat, you fundamentally misunderstand nutrition and there's clearly no reason in saying anything else to you.
i didn't say that, but sucrose isn't really all that fattening compared to starch and fat

if you're ABSOLUTELY DETERMINED to gain fat, yes you can do it on a high sugar diet

but what kind of person gets obese on a low-fat, high sugar diet? nobody, really. it's the polyunsaturated fats that promote diabesity, not sugar. that's a fucking shit meme. fructose promotes thermogenesis when a large amount of calories are eaten.

personally, i lost 5lbs per month EFFORTLESSLY on a high sugar (mostly from fruit jucies) low fat diet

Phytoestrogens =/= Estrogen

Fucking retard.

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4443321/
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23493533
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23966427
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3712514/
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4856550/
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22291727
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24493081
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4884775/
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17448569
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22070422
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5046992/

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21705069
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4166864/
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3584048/
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3969361/
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3773450/
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3595327/
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3494407/
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21765006
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24743309
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19880930
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3903110/

That theory has been debunked multiple times. There is literally nothing wrong with onions

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28751637/
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26109579
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3583887/
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28420091
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17921406
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4761710/
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4326908/
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4229419/
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2768570/
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4551584/
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29408694
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26055949
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23439375
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3893787/
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25928993
nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMc1311765
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28109280

>Am J Clin Nutr. 1993 Nov;58(5 Suppl):766S-770S.
>Fructose and dietary thermogenesis.
>Therefore the large thermogenesis of fructose corresponds essentially to an increase in obligatory thermogenesis. Obese individuals and obese patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus commonly have a decrease in glucose-induced thermogenesis. These individuals in contrast display a normal thermogenesis after ingestion of fructose. This may be explained by the fact that the initial hepatic fructose metabolism is independent of insulin.

>Minerva Endocrinol. 1990 Oct-Dec;15(4):273-7.
>[Postprandial thermogenesis and obesity: effects of glucose and fructose].
>In order to check whether reduced postprandial thermogenesis, as found in obese subjects depends on insulin resistance, the study tested whether the thermogenetic response to glucose in a group of obese subjects and a group of normal weight subjects differed from that obtained using an insulin-independent monosaccharide such as fructose... RMR was found to be significantly higher following fructose in comparison to the glucose response but did not differ from that in controls. Data confirm the existence of reduced thermogenesis in obese subjects induced by glucose. The fact that this phenomenon was not recorded in the same subjects following the fructose tolerance test, whose metabolism is insulin-independent, supports the hypothesis that reduced glucose-induced thermogenesis in obese subjects may depend on insulin resistance.

Many studies have found that sucrose is less fattening than starch or glucose, that is, that more calories can be consumed without gaining weight. During exercise, the addition of fructose to glucose increases the oxidation of carbohydrate by about 50% (Jentjens and Jeukendrup, 2005).

>Br J Nutr. 2005 Apr;93(4):485-92.
>High rates of exogenous carbohydrate oxidation from a mixture of glucose and fructose ingested during prolonged cycling exercise.
>A recent study from our laboratory has shown that a mixture of glucose and fructose ingested at a rate of 1.8 g/min leads to peak oxidation rates of approximately 1.3 g/min and results in approximately 55% higher exogenous carbohydrate (CHO) oxidation rates compared with the ingestion of an isocaloric amount of glucose. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether a mixture of glucose and fructose when ingested at a high rate (2.4 g/min) would lead to even higher exogenous CHO oxidation rates (>1.3 g/min). Eight trained male cyclists (VO2max: 68+/-1 ml/kg per min) cycled on three different occasions for 150 min at 50% of maximal power output (60+/-1% VO2max) and consumed either water (WAT) or a CHO solution providing 1.2 g/min glucose (GLU) or 1.2 g/min glucose+1.2 g/min fructose (GLU+FRUC). Peak exogenous CHO oxidation rates were higher (P

>be me as kid
>eat the regular standard american diet
>by sixth grade I have noticeable gynocomastia
>fast forward to now
>have acid reflux disease
>doctor says its because I consume too much dairy
>drinking basedmilk now
>no problems for the past few months
tfw vegan

Attached: frog.jpg (655x850, 51K)

if sugar was bad this fruit eating machine wouldn't be this beast
youtube.com/watch?v=-ADk_4dTXt8
ROFL
unless you mean refined or whatever even if there's a fucking difference I dunno and I dont care
niggas eat watermelon and are strong lmaooo

>that full-body muscle-up that took less than a second
I'm never going to make it

yeah well they go by correlations in non-randomized samples

compare people who consume a lot of sugar to people who actively avoid it. usually the sugar-consumers are fatter. their sugar sources are mainly HFCS, which has 4-5x as many calories as actually labelled on the package

>Much of the current concern about the dangers of fructose is focussed on the cornstarch- derived high fructose corn syrup, HFCS. Many studies assume that its composition is nearly all fructose and glucose. However, Wahjudi, et al. (2010) analyzed samples of it before and after hydrolyzing it in acid, to break down other carbohydrates present in it. They found that the carbohydrate content was several times higher than the listed values. "The underestimation of carbohydrate content in beverages may be a contributing factor in the development of obesity in children," and it?s especially interesting that so much of it is present in the form of starch-like materials. -Ray Peat, PhD

>FASEB 562.1
>Carbohydrate Analysis of High Fructose Corn Syrup (HFCS) Containing Commercial Beverages
>However, the carbohydrate contents of beverages determined after acid hydrolysis were substantially (4-5 fold) higher than the listed values of carbohydrates... With inclusion of mild acid hydrolysis, all samples showed significantly higher fructose and glucose content than the listed values of carbohydrates on the nutrition labels. The underestimation of carbohydrate content in beverages may be a contributing factor in the development of obesity in children.

it's total bullshit. that's why studies like and are useful, showing that fructose + glucose is far superior to glucose alone

Fructose inhibits the stimulation of insulin by glucose, so this means that eating ordinary sugar, sucrose (a disaccharide, consisting of glucose and fructose), in place of starch, will reduce the tendency to store fat.

Funny, around that age I started having a similar problem. So I started working out and eating less.

>So I started working out and eating less.
same, well i was already exercising (my parents forced me to)

i lots lots of weight, but my gyno wasn't fat -- it's breast tissue. it can't be lost by exercised, it must be SURGICALLY REMOVED

>Holding manchildren personally responsible for everything they turned out to be while living in society that teaches elementary schoolers that crime happens solely because of socioconomic reasons

Should have just accepted your fate and became a trap.

OP how do you square away the fact that hundreds of millions, if not billions of people have been raised with formula at this point and most of them are not a permavirgin fat fuck like you? More specifically if you think that it is the bean, why is it that China is not just swamped with feminine fat permavirgin men?

you could have lost weight eating literally your dad's prostate milk (which I suspect you already do) and as long as it's lower than your TDEE, you'll be losing weight you inbred fuck

>as long as it's lower than your TDEE, you'll be losing weight you inbred fuck
lel

i didn't have to count calories. i ate whenever i was hungry, that's a true diet. anyone who needs to count calroies and artificially stop themselves from eating is a KEK

>parents throw a shitfit if play more than an hour or two of videogames a day
>dont care if i spend all my time on the internet on places like Jow Forums
>wonder why i turned out like this
If you just let me play the fucking video games i might have never ended up here and turned out fine. I dont even like talking to people, the only time i spend my time talking to people is when i have nothing else to do, out of pure boredom.

Not really relevant to food but still relevant to shitty parenting decisions. Shitty parenting has fucked me up more than anything else could do.

china is swamped with feminine fat permavirgins

China is most definitely swamped with fat permanent-virgin men.