Your age

>Your age
>Your favourite lift

Attached: 02f.jpg (655x527, 49K)

23
Ohp

25
Clean

19 zercher pullup deadlifts

18
dips even though i just started doing them

Here is the postulate: men are superiour to women. So, it is perfectly fine for a straight man to want to have sex with a straight woman. What we mean by a straight woman is, a female human that is born with and still has a vagina and has all the secondary sexual characteristics of a woman (e.g. little to no body hair, big enough breasts, curves, small hands and feet...) This is what we shall call a "complete woman". Any other women, then, that a) no longer has a vagina or b) purposefully alter their appereances to look less feminine, shall not be considered as "complete women". To this category fall what we call tomboys, i.e. female humans born and possesing a vagina but look more like males. Wanting to have sex with an "uncomplete woman" is, therefore, gay.
Note that tomboys aren't considered gay because they look like boys, but because they lack consistency. Let us explain. The rules we have set apply to men as well. A "complete man" is a man who is born and still has a penis and has all the secondary sexual characteristics of a man (body hair, big enough muscles, beard if possible etc.) Men that are born with penises but make themselves look like women (i.e. traps) will, then, be considered as "uncomplete men" for they lack consistency: they ARE men but do not LOOK like men (similarly with tomboys who ARE women but do not LOOK like women).

As we have said, it is gay to want to have sex with a tomboy because they lack consistency. Therefore, wanting to have sex with traps should also be considered gay, because, again, they lack consistency. Note that the fact that traps are born men doesn't make liking them gay. From all these premises we can come to the conclusion that wanting to have sex with a "complete man" should therefore be not be considered gay. Indeed, the Ancients were aware of this and practised sex between fully masculine men (although paedophilia also existed, which is, in turn, completely gay).
As we have said in the beginning, men are superiour to women. This is true in the domain of sex as well, since only men can know what men want and would be able to give more pleasure to each other than any woman could. While having sex with a "complete woman" and a "complete man" is perfectly straight, one should choose the man, since he is superiour.
So, having sex with a "complete man" is perfectly normal. But should one have sex with ANY "complete man"? Of course not. Sex is an intimate thing and should be done with close friends only, otherwise it is degenerate. What about which position to take when having sex? Should one be the dominant or the submissive one? Since submission is a sign of feminity, having a "complete man" penetrated would take away it's manliness. One should, therefore, when having sex with a "complete man", change roles and be at times submissive and dominant, in orded to preserve equity.

28
The Press™

Attached: 1532614891242.jpg (602x552, 73K)

30
Sips

Are you me?