Do you believe different races can gain muscle more efficiently and faster?

Mean lean muscle mass (kg)
black males = 65.6kg

White males = 62 kg

Hispanic males = 59.9 kg

Asian males = 59.6 kg

Indian males = 53.3 kg

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/art...3180/table/T1/

Asian Indians tend to have more abdominal adipose tissue, less lean body mass (LBM) and higher magnitude of insulin resistance (IR) despite falling in the normal range of body mass index (BMI) [1]. The high value of waist hip ratio in Asian Indians may be due to less lean mass of the hips and greater fat at the levels of waist [2]. Another study showed that Asian Indian men have low muscle mass and 30% more total body fat (BF) than other ethnic groups [3]. Low lean mass is also evident in Asian Indian neonates as compared to white Caucasian neonates [4].

journals.plos.org/plosone/art...l.pone.0040977

At any given body fat mass value, South Asians had significantly less lean mass than each of the three other groups after adjustment for age, height, humerus breadth, smoking status, physical activity, and diet. Aboriginal, Chinese, and European men had 3.42 kg [95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.55–5.29], 3.01 kg (95% CI = 1.33–4.70), and 3.57 kg (95% CI = 1.82–5.33) more lean mass than South Asian men at a given total fat mass, respectively"

Ethnic Variation in Fat and Lean Body Mass

academic.oup.com/jcem/articl...596390

"Asian Indians had more fat, both total and in the abdominal region, with less lean mass, skeletal muscle and bone mineral than all other ethnic groups"

Body size, body composition and fat distribution: comparative analysis of European, Maori, Pacific Island and Asian Indian adults.

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19203416

It seems like Indian ''males'' simply can't compete with males of other races usually; even Chinese males are on average less fat and more muscled than them with a less feminine bodystructure - compared to the amount White/Black males achieve and it's unfair. Have you read much into this/seen it irl, Jow Forums?

Attached: file.png (480x360, 197K)

Other urls found in this thread:

science.sciencemag.org/content/early/2018/03/14/science.aar8380
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Yes of course. You can't say genetics makes a difference in gains, and then say that race doesnt matter. Its basically common sense

South Asia has at least 30 different ethnicities. Some are desert nomads, some are farmers, some are mountain people (goat herders). Their body types differ accordingly.

A lot of Indians are skinnyfat though.

>American racial studies that still differentiate races based on cultural aspects and skin colors and completely ignore actual genetic differences that matters
don't bring pol trash here, user

Attached: 1513889767027.png (1085x1217, 1.66M)

That's because the average Indian diet is trash, mostly rice and legumes

The average Indian diet is absolutely shit nutritionally too, I'm talking about what we eat on the daily, most people will get 80% of their calories from rice or chapatti. Sports is seen as something done only for enjoyment, schools in India will have 1-2hrs of PT a week maybe and you can sit through it if you feel like it.
Also you'll see fewer 5'5 twinks the further up north you go

Genetic PCA basically aligns with the colloquial races. There's at least one book which used race until the publisher objected and they basically just did a find-and-replace of race with population.

... post 2000 education standards have regressed so much since material used is being written by hyper-PC people nowadays.

Fuck sake there are different races, with different IQ's, different hormonal profiles and different body compositions.

Not everyone is the same, but groups of people living together over time will have a comparible average.

Fuck your studies
>Mfw I’ve been mogged by a nog before
>Mfw I’ve been mogged by a white before
>MFW I’VE NEVER BEEN MOGGED BY AN ASAIN
Pajeets are forever stuck in manlet and DYEL mode /thread

whatever helps you cope lad

There are racial differences but clustering by skin tone and arbitrarily drawn country lines made during imperialism is pretty fucking retarded, just as it is with IQ. You end up bunching together all kinds of people who have been genetically isolated from one another for millennia and it leads to idiots being empowered to say some totally outlandish things. If anything it'd be smarter to break by haplogroup, or even better - family lines, and throw race out the window.

Attached: pork.jpg (192x192, 13K)

Clustering by skin tone has a strong correlation with IQ tho

Thats the thing though, a lot of the 'races' we group people into are not people who have lived together over time with comparable averages. Blacks and Asians in particular have ridiculous genetic variance and geographic terrain made it so they literally broke into isolated pockets which maintained no contact with each other. All they have in common is skin tone from a common ancestor and to say theyre all in the same group from that factor alone isn't logical.

In Africa you have people ranging from Pygmies to Dinka. Skin color clearly isn't the line we can break things up by.

Pic related

Attached: MvVAo3y.png (887x641, 414K)

Yeah, it probably is true that the act of clustering by skin tone has a strong correlation with IQ.

>that 30 year old boomer that thinks race is skin deep

Gotta source for this? Interested in seeing what variables contributed to the final choices for principal component axes.

>Yeah, it probably is true that the act of clustering by skin tone has a strong correlation with IQ.

Call him stupid all you like, he the facts remain.


>There are racial differences but clustering by skin tone and arbitrarily drawn country lines made during imperialism is pretty fucking retarded
You don't know any history, nor anything about human nature. The imperialist history correlates positively with a nations development and wealth (meaning the colonized country), weather you go by duration, the numbers of colonial citizens or other measure of degree of colonization.

By your logic, shouldn't South Africa be the poorest country in Africa? Why did Rhodesia turn to shit after it became Zimbabwe? All the sanctions were lifted and aid poured in. Everything that should predict success was happening, yet it is now destitute

Do you even believe evolution?

A better one is the question of why South Africa's economy declined and crime got way worse after ceding political control to Africans.

>If anything it'd be smarter to break by haplogroup
that is already done, you just end up with the classical races

>family lines, and throw race out the window.
How do you think races arises, if every where was just a family inbreeding there would be np humans after a generation or two. Jesus Christ, you people are completely delusional on this point, first the races can't exist because of outbreeding and things like the bucket effect, and now you can only trace family lines. This tactical nihilism, "knowledge is not possible unless it's convenient for my point of view"

Evolution is a social construct

Attached: 83870548-288-k184952.jpg (288x450, 18K)

You can't just identify as a nigger if you're a han Chinese you dumb cunt.

Do the studies account for India being a shithole with no food and being mostly vegetarian

>Indian males = 53.3 kg
Holy shit, poor fucking Indians, it was over before it began

Attached: 1533473616760.jpg (250x221, 11K)

...do you know the history regarding how countries were mapped in Africa? If you do, do you also believe that each country's people are of nonisolated genetic background?
Or are you talking out of your ass again and reposting tired talking points?

Also
>Do you even believe in evolution?
Thats rich.

Are you actually so retarded that you think people who live in a geographic continuum don't also exhibit a genetic continuum?

science.sciencemag.org/content/early/2018/03/14/science.aar8380

>geographic continuum

Attached: 34034418_2018459621561987_4679201839168618496_n.jpg (625x625, 34K)

Are you so retarded that you see genetics as a continuum rather than a hierarchal tree structure where some branches become incredibly isolated due to geography literally pocketing them into different areas due to its non-continuous nature?

Even if the mbutu and ngongo peoples of eastern niggerstan have been isolated from each other for 80k years they're still funtcionally pretty similar as they're adapted to the same environment.
>leftist brainlet all up in this thread thinking he's got le epic debunk

you would get mogged by me, I'm 6'6" and well built

oh yes, absolutely.