Normal people say Oatmeal is very healthy but paleo people say it is very unhealthy

Normal people say Oatmeal is very healthy but paleo people say it is very unhealthy.

How can two sets of people with access to the same facts reach completely different conclusions?

Attached: oats.jpg (850x445, 416K)

One set is retarded

Aryan pastoralists have been at war with Mediterranean agriculturalists for a long time, user.

Paleo people are a bunch of pretentious retards

when I make it with water it tastes like ass but with milk it's great
feels bad man

Paleo is just a meme diet for sensitive wh*teoids who can't handle normal food

"Science" has a terrible understanding of what we should eat... as evidenced by the constantly contradictory studies/articles/recommendations on the subject.

It's a debatable topic.

It's almost similar to those people who argue that onions products are good for you and doesn't raise your estrogen while the others say it's bad for you and does raise you estrogen levels

Look the thing you gotta realise is everyone who goes on some meme diet and says "wow I feel so much better" its because the quality of the food they eat improves

It doesn't matter if its vegan or paleo or even full ketard, just paying attention to trying to eat healthy food is whats important

and i tried typing out pic related but i forgot that chinkmoot filtered the word

Attached: 500_F_16026058_jw0PTedbbkXtMo9OoNmvFVhY3JxSGnLp.jpg (500x188, 38K)

What 'evidence' do paleo people have against oats? They have an interesting story, about grains and lectins and evolution, but that's all conjecture.

Normal people:
1. Tastes plain. Bad taste mean good health ug grug
2. Quaker says good
3. Muh fiber
4. Natawaaaal=good

Paleo people
1. Ugh wug ancestors in perfect health. If eat old way then good
2. Oats not old way of eat
3. Oats BAD

Look, people are all using their tiny monkey brains to arrive at conclusions. The conclusion may be fine but their reasoning is shit. But NPCs can't invoke more complex reasoning that's non-dogmatic or produces only somewhat confident conclusions.

*tips* I can drink my onions to this enlightened gentleman

It's almost like the scientific process doesn't operate on the conclusions of a single study so reporting the findings of a single study will always be misleading even when journalists dont intentionally misrepresent said findings.

One of those groups actually values facts and information and the other is preserving their delusions that nature "intended" anything and that whatever nature stuck us with at one point makes it "optimal"

Steel cut tastes great. Cannot stand that rolled crap, steams out all the flavor.

Paleo is literally a money making scam. Somehow coconut oil is a part of the paleo diet for Europeans, but oats aren't.

>not eating plain oats
never gonna make it.

the paleo diet is literally the diet primitive spear chuckers ate before we came over and buttfucked most of them to death.

I like oats, but I came here to say your picture looks like the cover of that Neutral Milk Hotel album

Attached: nmh.jpg (300x300, 22K)

It's bad.

Attached: israel soy.png (710x469, 46K)

>Israel
Söy for goys but not for the chosen

Based

ye

That's mostly because onions is far from being a complete meal for children and retarded vegan or vegetarian parents were hurting their kids since they're too young to eat much else isn't it?

Can't go wrong doing what jews think is smart though.

Just mash a banana and add some other diced fruit to flavour it.

It's also the case that randomized experiments that would address our concerns (ie what are the long term effects of doing x instead if y?) are basically non-existent for nutrition

>paleo people
who?
oats are healthy don't listen to retards larping as paleo hunter gatherers
paleo man ate grains if he had the chance

huh?

>Israeli
No thanks.

Attached: 976cd2a7a4961ca6e997844c47776e6e25faff6fda87d8b7761d362af54ef087.png (640x553, 321K)