both illustrated people in the image are correct. from one person's perspective, the drawing on the ground appears to be a "6" and from the other person's perspective, it appears to be a "9." they are simply communicating what number they are seeing from their individual perspectives. one person seeing a 6 and communicating what they see does not mean that the other person is not seeing a 9, or is incorrect to communicate what they're seeing. If a door was painted red on one side and green on the other, and I said my side was painted green and someone standing on the other side said it was painted red, we would both be correct. The top typewriter font text is misleading, partly because it uses an unnecessary comma after "mean." Additionally, the message in the caption is misleading, because it sets up a false dichotomy in the 6 vs 9 perspective scenario. There is no evidence to suggest the men in the picture are having an argument, or telling each other that one is wrong and the other is right. A better caption would be "different perspectives can reveal more information about a subject." The message in the red font is wrong to assume more about the image than what is originally presented, although he could be responding to the misleading caption. there is nothing in the image to suggest that there is a world beyond the 6/9 or the two men, so there is no reason to believe that it is either 6 or 9. It would be difficult to prove his second paragraph right or wrong. It is frustrating to think that there are people out there who have less information about a subjeect that believe their viewpoint on that subject is equally valid as someone's with more information; however, he does not prove that the existence of those people is what is "ruining the world." The message in the black arial text is wrong for even more reasons than the previous statement. the author's argument is not nearly as clear as the message in the black arial font states.
Who in this image is correct?
Hypocrite that you are, for you trust the 6s and 9s in your brain to tell you they are 6s and 9s. Will you fight? Or will you perish like a dog?
The black text is a complete faggot the original text is a fag too. If the guys from the pic switched sides they would understand that there are dealing with an ambiguous situation and then proceed to finding out the actual truth like red suggested. They both aren't right the problem is that they both are stubborn fags.
CONT.
If that were the author's argument, he would've stated so more clearly and directly. Also, that doesn't really make much sense
>"there are some topics and ideas that are different for people with different perspectives, and can't be objectively classified."
if i look at a ball from one inch away, and can see the details of it, and someone else is looking at tat same ball from 100ft away, and it appears much smaller, it's still the same ball. it isn't different just because we have different perspectives on it. And while it may be possible that absolute objective truth is beyond the grasp of humans, it is also possible that it is within our grasp, and it is possible that all things may be "objectively classified." in short, they're all incorrect in different ways.
>Just because you are right, does not mean I am wrong
holy shit i've been enlightened. Anyone up for making a The Democratic Fascist Communist's and Capitalist's Islamic Theocracy of Christian Faith?
They're all retards and cunts. No one wins and the world becomes an even slightly shittier place.
>Anyone up for making a The Democratic Fascist Communist's and Capitalist's Islamic Theocracy of Christian Faith?
is it LGBTQ accepting?