Too many normalfags trying to bluepill gullible retards in here. Let's fix that.
Blackpill thread
Blackpill numbah two
Blackpill number III
Blackpill number iv
Blackpill number V
Blackpill number VI
Blackpill number VII
Blackpill numbah VIII
Blackpill number IX
Blackpill number X
Blackpill number XI
Blackpill number XII
>How incels raid a board
Blackpill numbah XIII
Blackpill number XIV
Blackpill number XV
Incels are welcome company, normalfaggots such as yourself aren't. Get the fuck out
Blackpill number XVI
Blackpill number XVII
Blackpill numbah XVIII
I'm gonna have to advise you to hang yourself in your bathroom once you've finished your thread lad
Original blackpill number XVIIII
Original blackpill number XX
Original blackpill number XXI
Original blackpill number XXII
Original blackpill numbah XXIII
Original blackpill number XXIV
Original and final blackpill number XXV
Not my thread, you monkey.
considering there's like 20 times more whites than asians in america this only makes sesne
Female serial killers are rare, but those who got caught also got tons of love letters from male fans.
hey op thanks for not being a complete normalfag, keep it up true robots appreciate it.
No problem. I love to BTFO bluepilled buffoons.
So what you're saying is, if you're ugly, suicide is the best option?
>XVIIII
>VIIII
>IIII
kys
Incels are failed normies and are shitting up this board
this image is normalfag bait keeping bullshit. the failed normie you describe is much more welcome than the top two.
Nobody likes bitter incels... not even robots.
You have no argument.
Pointing out grammar mistakes isn't an argument and refutes nothing.
Better than being a bluepilled cuck that's for sure.
i do, i love woman haters and pessimist aslong as they aren't dicks to fellow ones.
This is true of guys, too, come on.
If a guy had a super hot 10/10 fuckbuddy and he was fucking her once a week and also hanging out and she was pretty chill
and then, he has another fuckbuddy, but an average looking 5/10 girl who was nice, and then the average looking girl says "hey, I want to be your gf, be exclusive, so you'll be the only guy fucking me and I'll commit to you, but you must stop fucking that 10/10 girl to be with me"
most guys are not going to do that.
no lmao your image is the fantasy of a normalfag who browses here as part of their cool edgy persona.
Bullshit. Your fallacious theoretical event that you pulled out of anus almost never happens because women always date upwards while men date downwards, or with their looksmatch. Outliners don't mean shit. Men are simply more egalitarian than women when it comes to physical attraction.
>posting the graph that the creator himself said had an error
kek
Fuck off with your pro-tranny spam. You don't belong here.
What, you expect incels to have an IQ of above 80?
Is the panorama really that bleak?
it's customary to dis things with proof in a debate.
You have no argument.
You can do nothing, but pathetically try to poke holes since you have no evidence for your false claims. Your original point is bullshit nonetheless.
Doesn't this only ensure the most fit males reproduce?
Isn't that a good thing?
Fit for what sort of environment?
related1
Women don't reproduce with men based on genetic fitness, but on physical looks and wealth. This is a pathetic cope people use to justify the cancerous modern female sexuality.
related2
here is the true blackpill
women are more attractive when they have less muscles and around 15% body fat.
men on the other hand are hunter-gatherers, they are supposed to have a strong body.
your sedentary lifestyle won't give you this body though.
What's the difference between red pill and black pill?
80/20 rule is false. But women do shit tests, are illogical, etc. You're giving out fake blackpills:
hookingupsmart.com
>redpill
you can become chad
>blackpill
it's all over
Good thing I have a kickass bod. Too bad lifting doesn't change anything though. Literally everything in my life stayed the same except now I'm extremely fit. Lifting is a false promise, my brothers. Nothing changes.
I bet you write posts that boil down to "suicide is never the answer" on your social media you disgusting piece of two-faced shit
>You have no argument
Says the incel brainlet who posts made up graphs and numbers pulled out of his ass.
can you prove what you're saying?
Is OkCupid really a representative sample of men and male attractiveness though? Chads are not using browser dating websites
>brownpill
Everything and everyone is shit. Except me and it's not my fault.
It's not like womens' lifestyles are keeping them around their ideal of 15% body fat either.
You make a claim, the onus of proof is on you. None of what you posted are actual studies that can be linked to. Only incel blogs.
>80% of men are worthless in the eyes of women
80/20 is very real, doesn't matter what medium is used to find the numbers.
Is this accurate? Original
You have no argument.
> None of what you posted are actual studies that can be linked to. Only incel blogs.
Nope. They are all linked and many are made by university researchers. You got BTFO and can do nothing, but ''nuh uh''
they HAVE proof though, the onus of proof now falls upon you to support your disbelief.
>Chads are not using browser dating websites
Bullshit.
They're genetic metaphors about discovering a truth that is taboo or in some way hidden by society. Blackpill also has a connotation of hopelessness.
Really credible with a single dubious study as your source
why do they make stuff like this? do they just want to make others feel bad?
>It's not like womens' lifestyles are keeping them around their ideal of 15% body fat either.
yes but most of them are closer to their natural form than men and it's easier for women to reach that form.
the truth doesn't always feel good, though i'd say its worthwhile to spread.
there are various graphs and articles with various sources and studies.
That doesn't seem like black pill material.
I bet that's even in within the sampling error range.
Also you have to know where this is happening.
Not for the 80-20 principle that was only shown this one time in a deleted blog post
You have no argument.
You words aren't magic that turn a study dubious just because you shitted the words out of your mouth. There are tons of other sources in this thread that you conveniently ignore.
the deleted blog post was based off of data gathered from 17 anonymous tinder users. its only flaw is its small scale.
Nothing wrong with exposing the truth.
I realized this while I was in elementary school.
This is elementary.
>in a deleted blog post
Okcupid deleted the blogpost because normalfags bitched that incles kept linking it, so they deleted it to censor evidence and data because normies hate the truth..
Find me another study with this 80-20 principle surely a principle that important has tons of studies about it
i mean, who can argue with data
but does anyone have something against all that?
NEW Gold Digger Pranks - Girls Love Money! - SOCIAL EXPERIMENTS 2016 youtube.com
Incles*
Typo
It's called the Pareto Principle and it is a widely accepted concept in more fields than attraction/dating, dipshit
en.wikipedia.org
inb4 >wikipedia the sources are all there if you want to be autistic about sources
You have no argument.
It's not my job to spoonfeed you. I'm not gonna provide anymore sources until you debunk the source I already provided.
There is nothing about women in that article
But it isn't the truth. You find correlation where there isn't causation(male suicide rate and sexual revolution, I could just paste when they invented personal computers and do the same thing.) , you come up to conclusions on your own from studies where people that made them didn't come up to the same conclusion. Also using tinder and OKcupid studies to prove anything is simply wrong. They are not representative of real world, those apps are used simply for fucking and as females have higher risk associated with having sex at least in natural environment they are more prone to look for the top partner out there. You could even look at what females use as sexual fantasies to prove most of the things wrong here. Females like novels and in those novels they focus on the actions that a male can do while man can just get off to visual stuff. Dude you are not helping anyone. Even if this was all true (and it isn't) should all ugly males can kill themselves. But yeah you could do that or go outside and see a ton of man with much prettier girls than them just because they have manly personality or are funny. World is not as simple as you paint it to be. If someone paints the world like that you know he is fat into an ideology.
you asked for the principle that explains how the 80/20 rules works and occurs elsewhere and that is literally it.
I disagree. The reality is the same regardless and the common man gains no benefit from knowing it
you could say anything that happened around the same time caused male suicide rates to rise, but men seem to agree women are the reason.
I meant in relation with the women dating stuff you know what this thread is about
wikipedia hasn't linked it to dating is your reasoning for the article being wrong for linking it to dating? was this your plan all along when you asked for a source of something the article explains lol?
Stop being paranoid i have no plan I'm just asking you a link about a serious study on this 80-20 women dating stuff
Which men? The one that are dead because they killed themselves? I honestly don't think a single sane person killed themself just because they could not get laid, they had a lot of different problems. And even if what are woman supposed to do if they are not attracted to whiny man that will hang on a rope if they can't get that puss. How could anyone get horny thinking about that.