Are religious people the ultimate NPCs since they need outside programming in order to think and act?

started a like two months back but last night it was half the board. In video games NPCs are non-playable charcters that can't act outside the programs assignmentes to them, by calling someone a NPC you say they can't act on their own still a shit meme

well i meant more of how it came about, seems pretty dumb to me

Science answers the How to life, but not the Why, then whenever someone tries to come up with an answer for why atheist fags call them stupid because they're trying to figure out the answers to life in ways that makes people like you feel threatened and uncomfortable and insecure. It was actually religious people that came up with the Evolution, and Space time Relativity, and the Big Bang. So you can't legitimately sit here and claim that religious people are dumb just for believing in something too abstract for non religious fags to understand.

500 years ago if you told people there were invisible entities that lived inside of us, and that we're actually a monolith made up of these smaller creatures and they also had the ability to make people sick, no one would believe you, and they would laugh at you and mock you in the same ways that you feel entitled to mocking religious people, because back then there was no evidence of this and science hadn't progressed to the point to where it could prove such things existed. Though there was superstitions of this for thousands of years no one could prove it scientifically, until technology advanced to the point where we had tools for providing evidence of these things. Just because you can't provide evidence of something doesn't mean they don't exist, people for thousands of years didn't have evidence for bacteria, but bacteria still existed nevertheless, and some people had the opportunity to witness those creatures empirically, before modern science had, and the people that saw them were pronounced crazy, and stupid. In the same way that you call religious people crazy when they sense there's something more there.

Right now you're arguing against things that you don't even know exist, because your science hasn't told you it exist yet. You're literally no different than religious fags, yet you sit on a high horse for little to no reason, other than that it makes you feel superior.

Attached: comf.jpg (750x725, 365K)

thanks m8 (orginalmente)

pornhub.com/view_video.php?viewkey=335391400

This what atheism does to you.

Attached: Gustave_Doré_-_Dante_Alighieri_-_Inferno_-_Plate_7_(Beatrice).jpg (2320x2850, 997K)

>clickbait article mentions that some people have less detailed internal monologues
>"oh shit dude this applies to me I'm an NPC XD"
>faggotry ensues

>cherry picking the examples that were proven to exist
how about ghosts? people believed in ghosts for a long time and to this day there is no substantial evidence.
Yeah, I'll believe it when science can prove it.

And atheism is what christianity does to you.

Also, people saying "it's like the normies are npcs in a video game" has been a thing for years. The utter spam as of late is underaged posters forcing something based on a clickbait.

They don't need it to think and act, more of a guide.

Nope,agnosticism leads to theism wich lead to the realisation that atheists are fucking dumb no matter how knowledgeable they are about something especially if they say without a doubt there is no God.
Fucking look at the sky or something.
I bet you say Jesus and all the saints and martyrs were insane or how do you explain that then huh ?

Attached: Brainlet1.jpg (248x203, 8K)

>I bet you say Jesus and all the saints and martyrs were insane
Nope, I wouldn't say that. But when christians started reading the bible again they realized the church was fucking dumb, and then they realized the bible was dumb, and then became atheists.

Not really, PC's operate on a higher plateau compared to NPC's, we PC's are half-way floating through this mindless simulation world like we're somewhat dissociated from our physical body and seeing the bigger picture

>Religiosity implies mystical introspection
And yet they choose easy answers because of their feelings.

>He thinks medieval people believed in and could prove the existence bacteria
>ghosts
You mean multidimensional entities? So you're telling me you only believe in something if someone else tells you it exists. You sound pretty dumb. You know if you observe our universe what we have here on earth doesn't even rationally make sense according to science there's no way that the amino acids necessary to create life and DNA or even RNA could randomly accumulate and link inside the vastness of space. There's no explanation for life scientifically what so ever, we should all be space rocks, and according to your science there's no evidence of other life outside of earth what so ever, Evolution is strictly a theory, and carbon dating only can accurately go back 5000 years, and every other method of dating is hysterically theoretical. So what you believe now about life and practically every premonition about it based around science is entirely superstition according to science, so I find it incredibly ironic that you judge other people for their superstitions when you yourself have irrational beliefs that can only be proven empirically, and not factually. Yet you believe it's fact just like many religious people think they're religion is fact literally just because a person of renown told them it's fact, and not superstition. You're literally a religious person in denial.

Attached: smhug.png (2000x2000, 1.49M)

>500 years ago if you told people there were invisible entities that lived inside of us, and that we're actually a monolith made up of these smaller creatures and they also had the ability to make people sick
the idea of the atom stretches back to the first greek philosophers though fucknuts. anyway if you're going to believe in something believe in my religion, we are living on sparkled rainbow turd shatout by the unicorn that is the universe.

the difference between my facts and religious "facts" is that you can actually prove a scientific fact. Evolution may just be a theory but it is backed by evidence which religion is not. If you could provide sufficient evidence then I would change my mind but you people never seem to be able to do that.

Yah but they couldn't scientifically prove it you illiterate monkey. Many had ideals, but if you can't prove it, it's easy to call you stupid, because theres no evidence, which is exactly what I wrote, and ironically exactly what you're trying to conveyin your second sentence, you are literally professing your ignorance right now.
>Athiest fags literally seething and proving illiteracy.
BTFO neanderthal, yes i'm saying that ironically as well

Attached: 1458005863008.jpg (400x386, 25K)

You don't need to be religious to have outside programming determining your actions. In fact, if you think like this, it's more likely something else is guiding you because you think you're redpilled and can't be controlled so you don't pay attention to what might be influencing your actions anymore.

NPC meme must be some new atheist fuel, lots of these threads target religion specially christianity for some reason, like theyre trying to bring back 2010s atheism Glory, ive read the whole innervoice shit and im surprised some people didnt really have it but the sample was too small, like wtf 30 people doesnt set the whole population, also calling people npcs isnt New i guess normans here just like to spam the trendy meme

Attached: 1535970999626.png (378x378, 196K)

>Evolution may just be a theory but it is backed by evidence which religion is not
Evidence like what your dating is a meme, and the skeletons you've found though are marvelous don't offer any conclusive evidence for evolution, for all anyone knows they could just been different animals, and not links to each other. Like if I found a prehistoric fossil of a dog, and a cat. Sure they might have a common ancestor but scientifically you just can't prove it. Because that's empirical data, and one could suggest it hypothetically but not prove it conclusively. I'm not trying to disenfranchise your beliefs, but to be open minded you should consider this. Religious fags have historical landmarks, government census's, and interviews, which is evidence, even if it's poor for todays standards as they couldn't take a picture of it back then and post it online. So there is evidence for religion as well you just don't like the evidence. And there's nothing wrong with that, but stop being such a faggot.

I think my main problem with atheist fags is that they're literally so conceited and pretentious that they can't even ponder how people could believe something different from them. I mean I can see how you don't believe in religious stuff, but you can't even fathom how a person could believe in god. To you the idea is repulsive, and unintelligent, because you're literally too much of a faggot, to accept that people universally understand a great scope about many different beliefs and choose one that aligns with what they think to be true. To you that's just too foreign of a concept, because you're not intelligent, you just have autism, and you can't see how people have different views. Because that's what autism does to a person.

Attached: 1523326242848.png (310x326, 24K)

You are ignoring the reason why I don't like certain evidence and proceed to insult me because you know that you can't back it up. Certain things CAN be proven conclusively and just because certain questions are cannot be proven that way does not mean that the entire spectrum of possibility is equally possible..

Its because theyre still trying desperately to cling to the misconception that theyre tormented and ostracized for being free thinkers in a world that is just too dumb to be able to understand and accept them, and they will try to force this meme from every possible angle in an effort to convince others of its validity.

Meanwhile, they will stand for nothing, hold no moral or ethical convictions beyond what anonymous strangers on Jow Forums tell them to, and will back down irl the moment that things get difficult.

Yes, I am a Christian who believes in my religion, and I take many of my moral stances from 2000 year old teachings that have been discussed, debated, refined, and passed down through millennia from one generation to the next.

But, because they watch anime and masturbate seven times a day, this makes them superior to small minded fools like me.

Really, what I think it boils down to is the fact that they need something, anything to attack in an effort to stand tall upon their high horse, hoping against hope that if they just stand tall enough that they wont be able to see their own failures when they look down.

Me, I prefer to recognize the shortcomings of both others and myself, as well as the institutions both social and religious that I have made myself apart of, and move forward in an effort to better myself, secure in both my faith and my own sense of purpose.

Attached: 5835C501-2309-4FF5-957D-E270F60EF43D.jpg (908x539, 79K)

People whose main identity is atheism (fedora tippers, not just faithless folk) are much more cultish than your average religious person.

That's why it's existed for 2000 years right?

>Have largely been ignoring NPC threads because high cognitive function doesn't make you better than anyone else. Don't want to promote that mindset.
> See this thread in catalouge.
Here's your (You), good sir. It was a convincing argument.

not always but it is common for religious people to be NPCs. i don't think this discounts religion most people who are religious are disingenuous and only play lip-service to it as an authority and not a real principle that affects there lives, the same is true of athiests.

>You are ignoring the reason why I don't like certain evidence
No i'm not I told you, you don't like certain evidence because it makes you feel uncomfortable about it viability. You disenfranchise it, because you like being told what to believe like a sheep, you only believe what science tells you. You only believe in the material plane, like an insect believes in a blade of grass. There's so much more there than just grass.

What is this evidence? I am open to suggestion. It's just that whenever I challenge religious people's evidence, they get defensive and fall back on their insults like you just did.

>What is this evidence?
Read my previous post you hamburger, I explained the evidence most religious people go by 2 posts ago. Why are atheists so afraid of reading, and trying to gain an actual understanding. You guys always say you're open minded but you're not. You're so quick to talk about the bible but you've never even read it, and if you have it was in brevity. You don't have an actual argument or an opinion, you hardly even read, you're just a mouth breather. And i'm not saying that as an insult.

Attached: 1523328415352.jpg (340x340, 24K)

What if we are all programmed by God, but atheistfags are too arrogant to accept it?

Attached: opinion.png (163x209, 2K)

>there's no way that the amino acids necessary to create life and DNA or even RNA could randomly accumulate and link inside the vastness of space
and yet it did
>There's no explanation for life scientifically what so ever, we should all be space rocks
what is evolution?
>according to your science there's no evidence of other life outside of earth what so ever
this is true
can't be bothered to go through the rest really, I would like to see you defend your refutation that God did it.

Religious person here, I am not an NPC I am just thankful to the Dev for creating this game even tho I suck at it.
Most religious people are not NPC and have morals and have to take decisions that will count in the afterlife every turn.
The actual NPCs are non-religious normies who just live for pussy and hedonism without morals and without having hobbies or anything that challenges their morals or ideas

>and yet it did
Because it didn't happen spontaneously obviously lol
>what is evolution?
Evolution is a theory, a bad one at that. How does one evolve from nothing? What about the laws of Thermodynamic and Entropy? Lol what is actual conclusive science? If we're adding theories to science you might as well include God lol your logic.
>this is true
Yah, seeing that this is all extremely coincidental from what you've said, then it is very plausible that this could all be from a higher order. I don't see how you could not see that as at least plausible but like I said you're closed minded.

Attached: 1525195866702.jpg (399x388, 32K)

>And yet they choose easy answers because of their feelings.
>Implying nihilism isn't easy
Retard

The idea that this world is manifested from a higher being is plausible but not practical because there is no evidence besides your feeling of it to be true. We did not necessarily evolve from nothing, we evolved from the things that came before us. You will probably go back to the big bang to try and move the goalpost to how evolution began but we can prove that life now is a product of the environment before us.
The laws of thermodynamics and entropy are concepts meant to describe the functions that exist in our universe.
The thing about adding God into the scientific theory is that it is like a wild card. If it is to be found in everything in the universe then you should be able to prove the connection exists.

>The idea that this world is manifested from a higher being is plausible but not practical because there is no evidence besides your feeling of it to be true.
Practical? Nigga wut it's a theory, and the evidence is all of us being alive right now and nothing else in the entire universe as of discovered scientifically. LOL My feelings? I don't feel like believing in anything I just do when something seems plausible, it has nothing to do with my feelings.
>Everything else you said
You're comparing theories to theories and honestly it's just sad. The Law of Entropy always remains whether it's in substances or Animals, because like it or not we all are matter, and energy. If Evolution did exists it would happen be verbatim to how the Large Dinosaur evolved into a Small Chicken. If we really came from a common ancestors of small bipedal primates we would only decrease in size, not grow larger. This is due to the conservation of energy and it's relation to Entropy and how overtime you would see a state of deterioration, like how you become more susceptible to diseases as you get older, and your body reduces in mass, etc. It would be the same but on a hereditary scale, if evolution was really real. You can argue about theories, but you can't argue with a conclusive law of science. T. Atheist fags don't even understand science. Stop arguing with theories and just accept that you're a religious person lol the delusion on this guy.
The bible at least explains why theres no more dinosaurs your theories can still not explain this at all. If there was an ice age, it would have killed everything, not just Large creatures. If there was a Comet, It would have killed everything not just large creatures. If the Neanderthal's challenged every form of other Homo. there would still be other variants of Homos because they cohabited and were in isolated communities. you speak of God as if your entire theory isn't one big wild card LOL.

Attached: 1468380185365.png (244x206, 6K)

Believing in things just because they're plausible is not logical. Just because something seems reasonable doesn't automatically make it true.
Just because entropy exists does not mean that an evolved creature will have deteriorated function and no improvement. On a hereditary scale things are fluctuating but not generally degrading and this can be observed by organisms gaining or losing resistances or abilities. It is not 100% conclusive in the sense that maybe we can discover that yes God exists but the probability of that is low given the evidence we have.

>Believing in things just because they're plausible is not logical.
But it is logical, it's the basis of everything we as humans have done up until now. I believe there's a cause for something, I make something to find the cause.
Also adaptation isn't evolution, It's a short term thing. Just because we gain capabilities here and there in subsets doesn't mean we accumulate overall new identities. It's a meme with no long term observation to make it credible. Put a monkey in a cage for thousands of generations with other monkeys, and you'll have the same monkey with a smaller penis, or a bent penis, or a rounder penis. Sure he'll have a different quality penis, but that's not evolution, it's just sexual selection and breeding at best.

You've been comparing theories with theories for like 10 post now, you should give it a rest, you're comparing an apple to an apple and saying it's different because you think you're apple is better. It's not.

NEETs are the ultimate NPCs

Religious people and atheists are equally retarded. Religions are fundamentally a cultural thing that was first crafted to manipulate masses, I understand when someone follows a religion for tradition or culture, but when they actually believe the bullshit they read in those books that's when I have a problem. Atheists deny the existence of a superior power when the reality is that humans Don't know how the universe works and most likely never will, every question answered by science opens other 10 unanswered questions, hell our brain probably isn't even capable of understanding the complexity of how the universe is constructed even if some alien gave us all the answers, so denying that an entity or power that allows the universe and its perfectly balanced rules to exists is not possible is simply retarded as fuck.

80% of religious people believe because thats what theyve been told al their life not for any deep spititual reason. you can say the same about atheist. most just accept we came from monkeys because thats what theyve been told.

The question is how the apple came to be and which assumption is more accurate. There could be a million possibilities but which one is closest to the truth?

neets are the only ones u plugged from the machines. everyone else is dependent on them.

>literally Muh I think my apple is better than yours
You have no actual argument, you never really did. just accept it

Attached: 1455161769282.jpg (168x200, 6K)

The idea of someone always looking over me and creating an entire world for me to live in for no good reason besides "he felt like it" seems nonsensical.

The idea of nothing coming from nothing seems nonsensical. Literally Muh I think muh apple is better than yours again. Typical, It just really occurred to me that you never did really have a legitimate argument. You're just a mouth breather

Attached: 1455070543010.jpg (320x320, 8K)

Not knowing why something apparently came from nothing doesn't stop us from observing everything around us and coming up with conclusions as to why things work they way they do.

You're all wrong. The real NPC opinion is "It doesn't matter whether God exists or not. We should all just get along and live our lives."

It's just abstract thinking, I don't see your blatant opposition against being a free thinker. Religious people have made the most contributions to science and math. You should be thankful really. Einstein was a Jew, and Darwin was a non conformist Unitarian. You're getting upset at religious people for not conforming to the theories that they've created for people like you, and it's honestly pretty ironic and kinda pathetic really.

Attached: 1448419393608.jpg (264x191, 16K)

I just don't agree with their logic and you don't provide good arguments to persuade me.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miller–Urey_experiment

I'm not here to persuade you, i'm just here to be entertained. You can't be persuaded, you're closed minded. That's what makes you special.
>Wikipedia article
>Muh My apple is better than yours
Just because you can produce 20 amino acids doesn't mean you can combine them in the right combination fortuitously without interference. Nice wiki article that provided nothing tho.

I figured. Usually an argument over religion ends up in insults so I guess we're done here.

I never insulted you in that post, typical butthurt atheist

>using conscious thought makes it angry

This post is literally a fedora meme

there's nothing more NPC than not having empathy. while i don't prescribe to any particular religion myself, common decency says you shouldn't belittle others because of their personal beliefs.

Attached: shin_hanga_shinhanga_3206.jpg (960x1280, 209K)

they literally know the GM, they are like the game master little sibling

Catholicism (the only true religion) is backed by evidence for those with eyes to see. There's relics, miracles, prophecies, etc.

Attached: HFS3.png (991x693, 794K)

Day 3 DLC

atheism is what media does to you
atheists are the npc
>rick and morty told me to be an atheist
>family guy told me to be an atheist
literally npc

Religious niggers want me dead for multiple sets of reasons even though I follow the law.
Fuck 'em.

sure, some but not all. the same applies to nearly any major ideology or lack thereof. there will always be extremists and zealots because that's an inherent character flaw in a large portion of humanity with no regard to culture or environmental shaping. not that humity isn't without its value, we're just misguided in some respects.

Attached: 916f187a665785ab420d5d760fb70ffd--japanese-artwork-japanese-painting.jpg (736x1117, 168K)

How does anyone depend on NEETs? They do all of Jack shit.

Attached: 1536429735772.jpg (372x483, 32K)

Religious people are the only player characters. There are a few that can be tricked into atheism, just as the majority of NPCs have been tricked into kike corrupted versions of the abrahamic religions, but if you're not religious you're most likely an NPC. What do you think the inner voice is or what the basis of your subconscious is founded upon?

Probably your brain but definitely not magic.

Religious people and secular people have different advantages depending on whether you live in 1984 or a Brave New World.

AHHHH...I see what you did there.

I have been muted because robotnigthousand