Stop being right wing

>People who put a lot of effort into their lives don't enjoy being forced to share the fruits of their labor indiscriminately with other people who don't.

hmmmm....

It is possible to have discipline and take responsibility for oneself while being poor.

I'm just saying it's correlation not causation. Being fit doesn't automatically make you a douchebag, but douchebags are drawn to the gym.

Lefty Jow Forums checking in.

Can I drink beer on the couch but still get 50% of your gym gains please?

quick Jow Forums give me your favorite non-fiction and your favorite fiction "right wing" books to read

Attached: armond-white.jpg (416x625, 26K)

>less likely to believe in socioeconomic equality
What does this even mean? "Socioeconomic equality" is neither a reality nor is it a reasonable goal for society. It's literally gobbledygook.

Mein Kampf
Bible

This. Whites are more likely to work out because they are richer due to being hard workers that don't leech off the system like most fat and lazy minorities do. America would be less obese than most European countries if you only accounted for the white populations.

Attached: xNG8Jfn.png (1600x1600, 1.91M)

Do people actually think white people work harder? And almost every obese person I see is a middle aged white lady just saying.

no, but white civilizations are more successful.

It's not so much that they're hard workers it's more that they're honest workers and goal oriented. They make up the middle class, aspire to get a job and support a family. In the black community the men aspire to be rappers or sports stars or end up being thugs. They aspire to fuck like animals until they knock up their women and then run away 70% of the time. But it's okay because whitey pays taxes to support the bastard niglets.

Women in general are more obese.

in the past, yes absolutely (or were just better at the whole civilization thing, starting around 1450 AD).

Now? well the west is kind of riding the coattails of that advantage. :(

come visit the south, our niggers are lazier than you could imagine. they walk slower than a child can crawl. they have absolutely no motivation other than eating, begging for money, and avoiding police.

>thinking that's how leftism works
Right wingers are illiterate when it comes to basic systemic issues. If you really wanted to make an allegory using fitness, it would be more accurate to say something like "the gym owner gets to keep a percentage of everyone else's gains just because they own the building."

>Blacks
>Idaho
>"no data available"
Based Idanazis.

so, save up your gains and become the gym owner. capitalism allows you that avenue of improvement

leftist socialism says "no, lets make everyone into a mongrel with no gains at all -- equality of outcome!"

>implying wealth redistribution is the only metric for being left or right wing
Fuck off with your clickb8

Except literally none of that is true, which you would know if you had ever actually bothered to read any of the leftism you are recoiling against.

>so, save up your gains and become the gym owner. capitalism allows you that avenue of improvement
Literally no it doesn't. Read Capital in the 21st Century if you want data to back this up. Capitalism reinforces hierarchy. You're out of step because the savvy right wingers have realized that the masses have caught on, so now they've shifted from "it doesn't reproduce inequality" to "it reproduces inequality but inequality is good." You're still on the former.

Being right wing is at the core of my identity.

Economic arguments don't tell the full story. Liberals and lefties in America have gotten to the point where they openly glorify being weak/obese.

Attached: IMG_3341.jpg (726x705, 356K)

The Annals
Confessions of a Mask

it is absolutely true.
Reject consumerism and save your money, it'll take a while, but eventually you'll have enough saved for the down payment on a gym or whatever other business you want to make a go of.
But that takes time and effort, it's way easier to sit on your computer and bitch about the bourgeois or whatever the hell else you bernie fags think is holding you back.

you only think this way because you lack ambition

A thread died for this.

why am I a far left anarcho-syndicalist then?

>now they've shifted from "it doesn't reproduce inequality" to "it reproduces inequality but inequality is good." You're still on the former.

For anyone following along, what he's doing here is literally trying to rewrite history. Well not him, he's copying and pasting an argument made by one of his puppet masters, which is why it seems so hamfisted and out of place in the flow of the conversation- but I digress, you get the point.

We fascists have always acknowledged that social hierarchy is vital. It is a fact of nature as well. In fact nature is inherently right wing!

Attached: IMG_3330.jpg (1203x395, 65K)

mein kampf
lotr

Because you're in right grade.

Pro tip: if your ideology begins with "anarcho" you're a fucking idiot.

>mad at words
look at this dood lmao

You know, I actually did read Capital in the 21st Century. You know what message I got out of the book?
Inequality is natural. The rate of inequality isn't strangely higher today: it's about the same is it's been the past 400 years. Its just that inequality was strangely low from 1920-1970.
Why was inequality low? Two world wars - Europe literally bombing itself into oblivion. And now that we've stopped doing that, inequality is returning to its normal levels.

>"read this it has like a century of data in it to back up my claim"
>n-no actually im right and my proof is this dumb hypothetical I just made up
Good try, retard.

Okay, then show me all of the ambitious rags to riches people you faggots are so sure exist. Oh wait, that would require acknowledging reality instead of just saying that anyone who disagrees with you is lazy.

No, I'm not rewriting history. I'm differentiating between people whose views skew right wing, and full on fascists. You're obviously the latter but I'd be willing to bet there are a lot of right wing individualists who aren't open nazis.

>nature is inherently right wing
There is no system of economic exchange in nature so the term "right wing" has no meaning in that context, retard.

>fascist claiming other people dont understand history

>Inequality is natural.
Why are you retards so convinced that the functioning of an economic system, a fundamental social institution, is "natural?"

cnbc.com/2017/09/11/10-billionaires-who-grew-up-dirt-poor.html
so lazy, you couldn't do a Google search

Redistribute the gains!

okay trevor, you've finished your double mocha with fat free almond milk. let someone else have the window seat at starbucks.

save your your pseudo-intellectual bullshit for that dumb freshman chick you desperately want to impress in your econ 201 class.

>show me all the ambitious rags to riches stories
Read the Forbes list of richest people alive. Fewer than half of them inherited their wealth. The rest made it by starting a company that added value to the economy.

imagine being this mad at somebody who understands a political compass

Culture of Critique - Dr. Kevin MacDonald
Ride the Tiger - Julius Evola
Race and Economics - Dr. Walter Williams

Attached: 44065416_266309377357043_7828240150852272128_n.jpg (795x960, 57K)

>evola

Attached: FedoraManMlady-600x590.jpg (600x590, 46K)

>science confirms
Always makes me kek.

>right wing refers exclusively to economic systems and has no social/hierarchical implications

Not only are you wrong, but you've contradicted a previous argument you made.

Not an argument.

go to bed stefan

People are reading The Culture of Critique

Attached: IMG_3686.jpg (569x784, 81K)

What's wrong with being right wing?

it means you like licking boots

Hierarchy is bad

Attached: IMG_0275.jpg (1024x768, 238K)

I like how the media are recently using >the right as something to be ashamed of, as if everyone is a lefty by default