So, let me get this straight, you have videos and pictures of little girls getting fucked...

>so, let me get this straight, you have videos and pictures of little girls getting fucked, yet the defense claims you're not a pedophile because they're "just drawings"??

Attached: image.jpg (847x567, 493K)

they are older than 18
case closed

You stupid fucking faggot.
If you are ATTRACTED to the IDEA of AN UNDERAGE /LOOKING/ PERSON HAVING SEXUAL RELATIONS MORESO THAN AN AVERAGE PERSON, YOU ARE A PEDOPHILE.

she's actually a 5000 year old vampire your honor

well sir, she's actually 400

Being a pedophile is not a crime. Thought is not a crime (yet). Abusing children is a crime. Drawings are not children, so these images are not linked to child abuse in any provable way.

Also she's a 1000 year old demon.

mmkay, thanks for your input.

Attached: 2.png (1024x595, 559K)

The law doesn't (or shouldn't) care what you are attracted to. The law cares who you harm. If someone is attracted to a young-looking adult, that attraction might be of pedophilic nature, but the target won't be harmed because they are a mature adult in their mind (hopefully).
If someone is attracted to a very mature-looking child, the attraction might be considered non-pedophilic, but the target is at risk of emotional harm, so it's illegal.

>The law cares who you harm
Which is why we ban videos of little girls masturbating on camera while videos of little girls being murdered, dismembered, set on fire are all completely legal.

Well I personally think those things should also be banned, but I get your point.

good luck arguing that in front of a jury

I'd say it's entirely do-able. Here's one possible defense off the top of my head: Sexuality is more than just looks. Being aroused often comes from the imagination and what inspires it is hard to distinguish. It's entirely plausible that what sexually aroused the defendant is not the childish looks of the character, seeing as he was well aware the character is a 1000 year old adult, but rather the personality quirks of the character and her unusual fantasy characteristics. You wouldn't charge someone who masturbated to vampires and werevolves for bestiality, because you understand that the fantasy novelty, unattainable in real life, is what causes the arousal.

Judge al'tho I'm a serious masturbator, and I did put ex-hentai to good use during my neet days, I never once came to loli porn just wasn't my thing.
straight shota on the other hand judge, god damn.... I got a few I can recommend

Attached: DEx.png (729x949, 1.69M)

Is being a paedophile illegal?

no, but carrying out your desires is.
get therapy or something dude.

Loli is good since it helps pedos get their release without actually hurting anyone. You can't fix pedophilia anymore than you can fix faggotry.

Watching loli isn't "carrying out your desires" loli turns me on, I don't want to fuck kids though.

Still illegal in the States either way

>*prosecutor clears his throat*
>"they're little kids and they're being raped by old fat men"
gg ez

It's legal in many states.

>mfw the legal system is less able to understand that anime isn't real than autists like me

Attached: 1519493331076.png (1066x781, 955K)

What's with all the normalniggers on this board recently?

being a pedophile isn't a crime bro. Child porn is. drawn pictures aren't child porn even though pedos like both.

normies think you're a pedo for fucking an 18-year-old
you can get raped for fucking up a tax return and they won't lift a finger to help you but they'll go all out for a woman who's old enough to have a degree

it's useless to care about what they think, the social contract is null and void, molon labe

Attached: drake.png (521x1300, 596K)

I love them in spite of the way they were drawn. Because these are mature 5000 year old vampires, your honor.

Objection.
>Sustained

Normies think any large gap in age is unacceptable. A 50 year old guy having sex with a 25 year old would be considered unacceptable to normies and he would be called a pedo and a creep

exactly

people thought I was a retard for calling the 16 thing a slippery slope but who's laughing now

>recently
Sure, user, recently