so I'm small in stature, and relatively petite (thin joints and so on), and I've been lifting for ten years on and off. I fit this description,
> Looking small as fuck when lean, needing a pump to look exceptional [...], gains capping at the 3 year mark, looking dyel in clothes
However, I took out the nutrition part,
>having to give a fuck about nutrition for such a small benefit
because frankly it makes very little difference. Basically it just involves eating enough meat and getting enough protein, but what is "enough" is pretty ambiguous and the topic is open for debate IMO.
After all these years, overall, I think I look good, I feel good, and I'm capable, and when I'm naked or at the beach I look good as well. Ultimately steroids/gear strikes me as quite degenerate, essentially exchanging health for vanity as I suggested in another thread, and it seems like something you have to continue to continue reaping the benefits of.
It's true that I don't look big in clothes, but I look fantastic in a swimsuit and etc., and I look much better in a fitted button-down shirt than I would otherwise. I think I'm the best version of myself that I can be, even if I've hit an "artificial" plateau by not juicing.
If anything, I think the blame for what you're describing, OP, falls with Hollywood and the genuinely artificial standards of muscularity they've set for men. If you look at women in Hollywood, they're even starting to promote fat, retarded, gimped women, while all of the men are clearly on steroids.
100 years ago any trained or simply Jow Forums guy obviously stood out from the dyels, it was more an overall youthfulness, a strength, a vigor, the word is on the tip of my tongue but it means basically "fertile" but with a male connotation...
pic related, it's me in the most flattering conditions possible. On a day to day basis you can't really tell I'm in good shape as you suggest OP
Attached: selfie.png (1094x814, 1.26M)