Any anons have read or are reading pic related?

Any anons have read or are reading pic related?

I am finding it very interesting. For instance, never new how good kale was so good for you, or that coffee is actually very good for your liver. I have already made changes to my diet, such as adding chia seeds and flaxseeds to my porridge in the morning.

Attached: 81RvGjUWqlL.jpg (1684x2560, 364K)

Other urls found in this thread:

healthline.com/nutrition/how-not-to-die-review
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

>wanting to live long
why, just why?

The author is 46 and looks like a 60 year old AIDS patient.

That should tell you all you need to know about eating nothing but obscure plants.

Attached: HNTD-MichaelGreger-DSC_0110.jpg (1142x1280, 1.14M)

if you could live forever as a 19-year-old Chad it'd be worth it but living forever as an old retard just sounds like shit

>What are genetics

this is actually valuable information, user.

be aware tho, fat bulktards don't want to hear the kind of information in this book

only if it reset your entire brain though and made you double digit IQ. even if I looked like a demi god, but I still had my experiences, I would still fucking hate this world.

Looks fine to me, aside from the hair. His complexion is better than most middle-aged fucks.

That's gonna be a yikes from me, read someone actually intelligent like Ray Peat instead. He also publishes every single work that he owns the rights to for free on his website.

user it's not like this books is his opinion. For every chapter of this book he refers to like 70-80 studies.

Read it and tried it. Life was better but I just did vegan type shit with meat on the side. Weight is down and bp is better.

That's what I'm thinking of doing. Not cut out meat completely but just eat less, and more vegan foods overall.

eat meat

I'm vegan and eat a mostly whole food plant based diet but i highly disagree with a lot of what Greger says.

Can you give some examples, and why do you disagree?

So does every other 105 IQ charlatan on youtube, go with actual academics like Ray Peat and not ideologues.

The good ol' biology phd. He should stick to articles about hormones instead of stupid historic narratives.

agreed, you should kill yourself right now

>the ol appeal to authority argument
kek

healthline.com/nutrition/how-not-to-die-review

>Ray Peat
>actual academic
what's his h-index and most recent peer-reviewed publication

He seems to be right up Jow Forums's alley though, muh evil estrogen, muh evil polyunsaturated fats, muh devious grains and legumes and muh based meat and dairy (at least he's pro fruits for whatever that's worth).

Thanks for sharing user, good read

>Indeed, a milkless diet was a risk factor right alongside unhealthy BMI, smoking, and alcohol consumption

Not drinking milk like being a fat, overweight drinker who smokes all the time.
Anti-GOMAD shills btfo.

you can get alot of decent content from the same guy on youtube and also his website. not a vegefag but he does a good job with research reviews

He's fucking 46. He shouldn't look like that at all. He looked 60+. Are you brain dead

Pic related. This is your best book in relation to your diet

Attached: 512V3F9C4EL._SX339_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg (341x499, 41K)

this book is based, I use it as a model for my day to day diet

he's a white guy. at least a third of men start balding early, and if you live in the united states, don't have any melanin, and don't wear sunscreen everyday, that's what you look like at 46

But why would you take your advice over a biased jew who looks like shit at 46 lmao, most people who don't give a shit about their diet look better than him at 46. biggest cope.
Keep following the bias jewish man with the anti-nutrient diet

It's fine but a lot of it is cherry picked bullshit to support a vegan agenda. He downplays the value of DHA and EPAs by citing one of the most criticized studies. Everything is really designed to unambiguously support a vegan lifestyle, when in reality the evidence itself is far more mixed.

It is quite amusing to learn how much agency exercise and nutrition recommendations stray from the best available scientific evidence, apparently because agencies thought people wouldn't follow their recommendations anyways

Attached: Dr_Greger_at_Pure.jpg (400x300, 168K)

that's a powerful prescription on those glasses. holy shit.