*drops mic*

Food is the essence of human life. Why should we give a fuck about a socially constructed economy?

You're trolling right? I can't tell if you're actually this stupid or just messing around.

Take the minimalist pill and you will be much happier with your life, user.

>socially constructed economy
You sound like a 14 year old who relies on handouts from mummy.
Of course economies don’t matter if you don’t need a job.

Retard

Please go back to Jow Forums

I work at a restaurant and make a decent salary thanks to my connections with the owner. Most of my spare money goes to my hobbies, and that's all I really need.

Yeah, food is definitely indicative of cultural success/ mental capacity

Attached: tacos.png (639x551, 151K)

So when the “socially constructed economy” no longer affords patrons to visit your friend’s restaurant and it goes out of business where does your income come from?

We have cookbooks
We don’t need to import third world shitheads for it

>you can't have trade without migration

Attached: 1532327221989.png (403x448, 53K)

It kinda does.

mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/chef-prepared-curry-after-wiping-7745790

isn't this the guy whose daughter got raped and murdered

Well if that happens, I highly doubt that the main cause of it will be cultural diversity.

Cook books are a meme among real cooks. The best way to learn how to cook is from the original creators of the recipe. If you're trying to find out how to cook Mexican/Chinese/Italian/etc. from books, chances are that they're watered down and extremely Americanized versions of the recipes.

>boy it's a real shame that your sister had her rape and murder by those non-native muslims recorded on video and posted online
>yeah but at least the rapists' mother gave me this great harissa meatball recipe! i could have never googled something like that!
May God have mercy on His true followers and give people like you cancer

>banh mi

Attached: 1528375170405.jpg (593x527, 40K)

There are lots of issues with cultural diversity, but without it, humans won't fully understand each other. I think it's possible to have a good outcome from it, but the way we're doing approaching it isn't ideal. The Muslim refugees who rape women also have the same mindset as people like you. They don't understand people who are different from them, nor do they respect those differences. Ironically, religion is the biggest perpetrator of this characteristic.

So what exactly is the benefit in two groups wildly different in advancements forcibly integrating? What does a group that frequently puts cutting edge tech into space have to gain from mud hutters and sand farmers that barely survive daily life? How is a culture of literate, relatively highly educated people benefited by allowing in people who are for all intents and purposes illiterate, wholly uneducated, and reject the culture that was ironically so welcoming to them?

You dont become immune to the deadly nature of bleach by consuming small amounts and gradually increasing the quantity, and in this case this isnt even a gradual increase

I wonder what type of neighborhood Frank lives in. Hmmmmmmm

There is no benefit, nor is there any obligation by Western countries or their citizens to allow this.

Anyone positing otherwise is either an idiot or holds malicious intent.

I can learn the ethnic recipes from the internet, that's the worst argument for more diversity out there. Also

>work at a restaurant
>make a decent salary

Oh no no no

This so much, I look forward to the little things in life

Music

We already discussed one of the most important cultural aspects, which is food. If society's only goal is to work towards scientific advancements, that's real fucking depressing.

How can we possibly achieve peace without mutual respect of cultures, and how can humans learn to respect each other if we isolate ourselves into groups? The world right now is the safest it's ever been, and that's only because people living in advanced countries aren't mindless enough to support every dispute with foreign countries that the government propagates. We're able to view these things at a more morally logical standpoint thanks to the fact that cross-culture communication is easier than ever.

when did Jow Forums have so many Jow Forums-tier posts

I'm assuming Europeans aren't included when he uses the phrase "Ethnic". What then, are Europeans, if they are not an assortment of ethnicities? Aliens from another world?

> if you opose inmigration you are just like a 3rd world gangbang rapist

I wonder who is behind this post

|
|>
|3

Communication isn't equal to invasion and dilution of your culture at the expense of some one elses

Are you retarded?

In Perth, Western Australia where we have a festival annually. It's just basically white people buying from brown/yellow people.

>We already discussed one of the most important cultural aspects, which is food.
How is that a genuine benefit? That's a nicety of life, but not an aspect that improves society as a whole. Not even in terms of scientific achievement, but food only tangentially promotes inclusion compared to things like art and literature. And even then, most ethnic foods get watered down by the host country anyway and the only people to complain are ethnic people in the first place, so who really cares if the host society feels satisfied enough?

>How can we possibly achieve peace without mutual respect of cultures, and how can humans learn to respect each other if we isolate ourselves into groups? The world right now is the safest it's ever been, and that's only because people living in advanced countries aren't mindless enough to support every dispute with foreign countries that the government propagates.
How can we achieve peace without mutually understood and practiced conduct and advancement goals? Turf disputes among people with minute differences in culture occur every fucking day, so why does there need to be a push for groups of greater differences to cohabitate against both their social beliefs and their own benefits? The reason the world is so peaceful now is not because of cross-cultural integration, but because of improved diplomatic efforts and MAD. Diplomacy can and does successfully occur in disparate cultures without integration. Your rose tinted glasses are fucking obnoxious

I can see someone failed reading comprehension in school

It doesn't have to lead to the dilution of culture. That's why I said that the way that the west is handling integration is wrong. An idiot can tell that blindly opening your doors to waves of poor refugees isn't the most calculated way of doing things.

Can you get this trash out of here jannie thanks

>How is that a genuine benefit? That's a nicety of life, but not an aspect that improves society as a whole.
Well why not value individual niceties? When people are introduced to new cultures, food is almost always the first thing that's represented. It can completely change one's perspective and tolerance of another culture. You see it happen all the time. People who start to enjoy one aspect of a culture start to eventually open their minds to other aspects of that culture.

> Turf disputes among people with minute differences in culture occur every fucking day
Yeah, disputes happen all the time. You can't ever stop it. But you can't compare some small scuffles to historical racial and religious genocide caused by the sheer ignorance of the masses.

> improved diplomatic efforts and MAD
What? Diplomacy didn't just make some sort of evolution in the past half-century. Ultimately, the opinion of the masses matter the most, unless we live in a fascist society. Why did the American government try so hard to push pro-war propaganda through the media, if not for that?

>we should appreciate diversity because it brings us new foods which help us appreciate diversity
>disputes have only ever been caused by lack of understanding
>diplomacy has not become more important in the wake of nuclear proliferation

really boggles my scrabble

>remove Jow Forums to different website.
>Wow why are there so many Jow Forums on Jow Forums?

I guess we will never know.

>Well why not value individual niceties?
Because en masse, that's considered hedonism which is generally bad for sustaining society. All the other tripe you're saying about it is largely fabricated by media heads. You can easily go to a foreign country and continually encounter things you find repugnant, both food and culture-wise. Just because Bourdain jerks off to the idea of shakshuka doesn't alleviate middle east bullshit

>But you can't compare some small scuffles to historical racial and religious genocide caused by the sheer ignorance of the masses.
Please enlighten me to this. I'm very curious as to what mass scale genocides occurred in total social vacuums as you imply

>Diplomacy didn't just make some sort of evolution in the past half-century
The 20th century brought us global politics, you nonce

>Why did the American government try so hard to push pro-war propaganda through the media, if not for that?
>implying mass immigration isnt another propagandist meme

nice fitness post

>we should appreciate diversity because it brings us new foods which help us appreciate diversity
Yes, chain events are a thing.
>disputes have only ever been caused by lack of understanding
Social disputes, yes. Economic disputes are a completely different story and has almost nothing to do with the topic of cultural integration.
>diplomacy has not become more important in the wake of nuclear proliferation
Diplomacy only overshadows public opinion when nuclear warfare is concerned and global crises is at stake, not conflicts with third-world countries and non-superpowers. At this point the topic of the discussion once again veers from integration.

Culture is not a one way, linear path to enlightenment. Its entirely possible that mud dwelling savages do have things to teach us, especially considering Amerimutts have no culture anyway.

Of course, that is not the same as saying that allowing a bunch of savages into your country and giving them welfare is beneficial.

>circular logic is not a fallacious
>pretending economic disputes have nothing to do with forced diversity; pretending forced diversity doesn't lead to social AND economic disputes
>diplomacy doesn't matter except in the most extreme political examples

tell me more

Attached: 1535942018039.jpg (500x599, 73K)

>Culture is not a one way, linear path to enlightenment.
I'm not talking about enlightenment. Frankly I dont think enlightenment truly exists. However practice doesn't necessarily have to be separate from theory, so exposure to the ideas that may in fact be beneficial doesnt have to occur through transplant. If these cultural benefits were so profound, then why is the idea of them only discussed and not the actual applications? For example, say random brown group a has a different understanding of the family unit than white group, and brown group b has an even more differing understanding. Why is neither the actual discussion of such understandings not occurring without integration and why does b's understanding equivocate to a's among the white group when the disparity between a and b actually be dangerous?

Further, a major component to more educated societies is a significant value placed on abstraction for application. Again, why is this abstraction not enough if the benefits are poignant enough to justify integration?

No you need unprecedented hordes of foriegn people for food akshually. All your food is shit you need other stuff.

Holy fuck. Sorry I'm on oxycontin right now for a post-op thing and realized I fucked up my point a bit. Let me fix it
>Why is the actual discussion of such understandings not able to occur without integration? And why does b's understanding equivocate to a's among the white group when the disparity between a and b may actually be dangerous for the white group?

How is this fitness related? My threads about bodybuilding that I made on Jow Forums got deleted in minutes yet this shit with stay up.

That poor dad, I can't imagine being cucked to the point of having to go on national television and suck the dick of the people that killed your daughter.

i didnt know you need muslim immigrants to have ethnic food in your country.

i have baklava and other shit like shaorma without have the turks over here. i dont want them here

Look at Brazil or any other multi-cultural country. They are all shitholes.

Yeah bro, don't you know you HAVE to let in millions of immigrants from third-world shitholes who will mostly leech government money and commit crime so you can get some nice ethnic food?

N-no, you can't just look up the recipes on the internet, that's cultural appropriation and racist!

>No corncob in her ass
4/10

Attached: behind this post.png (127x204, 42K)

Not fitness related

Force feed Africans with milk and see how much diversity will improve their guts.
Or force feed Asians with alcohol and tell me what happens.
Or force feed wheat to celiac and get back telling a wonderful story.
Or force school to serve dog meat.
Or take a Muslim and shovel pork down his throat.

This is the process about diversity they are referring to.

>every single "diverse" community is a dirty shithole, including Asian ones
Why is this the case? I don't get how non-whites don't have a feeling of responsibility for their surroundings. Certainly there are white people who don't either, but those are antisocial elements that should be removed from society anyways, but black, arab, Latino and Asian districts being disgusting is universal.

He meant how the French raped, destroyed, and crippled the Vietnamese.

For like 4 years now, I actualy don't know how it was before that because I only started coming here 4 years ago.

I can cook my own tacos without washing my hands thank you very much.

South America is a shithole in general.

Name one war that a western nation has been involved in that actually stopped because the citizens were protesting it. Vietnam was a multi year campaign that only stopped because Americans weren’t winning, so it doesn’t count

We don't "stop" wars. We prevent them. The war with Iraq only happened because the government managed to persuade the majority of the public to support the war. Also, the Vietnamese war permanently changed the public's perspective on the government. People hadn't become critical of the government's actions until after that war.

Yes, but they won't be *authentic* unless you get a tan first

>historical revisionist has entered the thread