Wow, who would have guessed?

we need to rise up, brothers

Attached: DjetzKOW4AAkUq4.jpg large.jpg (814x578, 108K)

Women are hypergamous pieces of shit that always default to the 80/20 rule if left to do what they want, its so rigged in muscular mens favor that its not even funny

You mean
SHOULDER WIDTH - FIT - HANDGRIP

To be fair 80/20 is pretty much applicable to every context

I am only 5'6" but I have the body of a miniature Greek god and I don't have fist sized pepperoni's like OP's pic. My nipples are quite nice.

Why am I not swimming in pussy juice?

Attached: Screen Shot 2018-12-13 at 8.11.07 PM.png (576x424, 347K)

What's 90 divided by 20

So tired of articles that present one study with
>It's official:
>Science says:
this is a psych study. 80% of the time they're just trying to say something counterintuitive to get reads. fuck it.
This is as someone who is fucking yoked, too. Just because i agree with the point of this one doesn't mean I approve of you posting it on my board.

Because you're 5'6

It's (((official))), children understand consent

>miniature greek god
user, patron god of manlets

Read the OP again very closely

It says right in the article height was one of the attractive factors. Women don't like having to crouch down to kiss you.

>am turbo manlet
>y no gf?

This literally started as a joke on total frat move and people thought it was a real thing lol

LOL I love it how normies actually think that now, cracks me up.

>THIS JUST IN: Water is wet

youtube.com/watch?v=ugyqOSUlR2A

Water isn't wet, wet describes something that has come into contact with water.

this is the dadbods they're talking about

Attached: 1544395371255.jpg (418x640, 78K)

>how physically strong he LOOKS
powerlifters btfo, hypertrophy is the way to go

Kelsey Grammer in later seasons of Frasier has peak dad bod.

Attached: frasiershirtless.jpg (640x478, 59K)

>I am only 5'6"
>Why am I not swimming in pussy
Because you have down syndrome.

>5'6
go to the gym, fat ass

Because if you got out of the shallow end you'd be drowning.

Sure whatever, but asking a few hundred people about what's attractive or not in a uniform way is probably a better way to know what's attractive than sitting on your butt and pontifying or asking five females

You are sitting and waiting!

>Not doing it to achieve physical perfection.
Pathetic.

Oh I am laffin

How is anyone of Jow Forums complaining about this?

Women are attracted to muscles and money. I love growing my muscles and it motivates me to make more money.

HEAD - SHOULDERS - KNEES - TOES

really? Last I remember women want someone with money who can provide for them and their sons/daughters.

I guess muscles can pay for tuition and food, lol

Is that Alex Jones? Nice dubs btw

Yes, they want someone who can provide for them. They don't want to fuck this person generally, though. They want to fuck the guys with muscles.

Protip: When a woman says she likes a guy with muscles, she just saying she likes a guy who isn't a skinny lanky cunt whose just skin and bone, not some IFBB bodybuilder.

I, and many others prefer bigger guys. But people have completely taken that and turned it into "dad bod". I just want a man that has strength and muscle but isn't low %bf. So many women I talk to feel the same way.

You can do both dick head
You can be jacked and financially stable enough to support dependents like your mentally handicapped wife

Lol no women are all expected to get jobs now and pay for shit. They don't care unless you've got fuckloads of money

Protip- We already know no one likes people modern bbers. But based on this study and other data points (like what men are chosen by women paying to see them) the cutoff is way beyond "not trained"

This was a good study, so getting a bit old now.

Here's a non-pleb summary:

150 college thots were shown pictures of college men wearing a wife beater and shorts. The men's faces were obscured. Thots were then asked to rate the attractiveness of the males.

The hypothesis was that visual cues of strength in human males was attractive to human females. The study found that visual cues of strength in human males were attractive to human females. Furthermore, the study found no upper limit to this effect. Stronger looking men were always more attractive.

Now.....
Here's the caveats, working back from their last conclusion:
>The men were all just college students whose strength was measured in exercises and then pictured. This means two things:
>None of the students were body builder/strong man big. They were your average college students, the skinny fats, the chris-chans, the dyels, and the bros. It is very obvious that a picture of ronnie coleman on there would not have been rated attractive. This heavily undermines the conclusion that there is no upper limit to the attractiveness of strength.
>Secondly, the men weren't scored for cues of strength directly (say biceps measurments or something), they were scored for actual strength and the correlation is thus not between being strong, but rather looking strong.
>Lastly, the conclusion that cues of strength influence attractiveness is entirely baseless. In a real setting, cues of strength go with cues of social status, face, voice, behavior, etc...
>It may be than in this scenario, cues of strength are important because that's literally the only thing being presented. It MAY be that when face, status and such are presented, they completely dominate, and cues of strength turn out to have no real effect.
>Lastly, the surveyed population was entirely college thots, MILFs and Lolis might have different tastes.

All in all good study, but care needs to be taken in the interpretation.

Just realized I was mixed up on just one point thinking of a different study.

Here the pictures were presented and then thots actually rated them on two scores, strength and attractiveness. This invalidates my previous critique about correlation between actual strength and perceived strength, but raises a more serious concern:

>It is entirely plausible that more attractive men are rated as stronger, and thus it may be that the study is overestimating the importance of visual cues of strength and underestimating the importance of visual cues of leanness, frame, and height.

That is all.

tell that to yourself if it makes you happy

>This heavily undermines the conclusion that there is no upper limit to the attractiveness of strength.

There was no such conclusion you dimwit. They noted they OBSERVED no upper limit, but they didn't just say "haha, that's right guys, there's no human body too muscular!"

Rather, within the entire range of the sample there was no indication of an upper limit. Which is really notable. If they HAD found a plateau, at, say, the 95th percentile, that'd be very informative.

Instead it's very good evidence that you can expect your attractiveness to increase with great certainty at least until you match your beefiest college chads. Beyond that? Probably to some level

>MILFs and Lolis might have different tastes.
We need further research funding.

The only women who don't want muscular men are morbidly obese. Obese women have high testosterone levels and want to dominate their partners. That's why most feminists are fat. Always take notice of which women say they prefer slim or "feminine" men.

DADDY BOD

Haha Varg got you

No. This is.

Attached: 1542927806805.jpg (404x600, 30K)

4.5

So much shoop on those abs

women don't exst faggto stop lying

Even those women want a muscular man, most just won't admit it. Some even think they're entitled to it.
Anyone got the image of that fat, black chick whining about how fat dudes try and approach her and wondering why no muscular dudes want her?

Attached: fat_delusion.jpg (876x1624, 289K)

Unless you're referring to a singular molecule of water, it's wet. It's not wet by definition, but any time there's some quantity of water that is comprised of more than a single molecule of water, every molecule of the quantity is in contact with water and is therefore wet

C O P E

>Fist sized pepperonis
>Normal dude
Maybe you're too judgemental of others and their bodies, nobody wants to be around that especially not insecure women

Must've been all the coke

By dadbod they mean a super huge guy, probably a huge skeleton too that mogs everything. Also super hairy, beard and all, just keep your hairline in check and be attractive. This is what women really want and mean. Dadbod on a framecel = skinnyfat, which is fail and you might as well run prettyboy game instead and get on some tranny drugs.

Attached: 1249180555724.png (428x510, 181K)

Every body dismorphic guy on fit has to at least date one body dismorphic woman in their life, to truely understand their own bullshit

>be bloatmaxxed strength athlete (fat powermemer)
>King of manlets at 245 freedom units
>work construction and live in a derelict studio in the projects
>have no form of transport
>have an ex gf whom I left because she started losing weight and turning from Braphog to cardio bunny
>calls me up a couple days ago for a booty call and I oblige as any gentleman would even though I dislike her current skinny physique
>spend 48 hours slamming, sniffing, eating, and drinking the cheapest wine my puffy hands can find
>cuddle while talking in between 6th and 7th bout of raw vaginal intercourse
>ask her if she is single since she stayed the night and she says no
>she can only stay over cause her bf is away on business
>call her a whore and she tries to laugh it off so I say it again
>ask her about the current unlucky victim of her wiles
>Ripped, 6'4, owns own home, a motorcycle and a new beemer
>works in IT lmao
>ask her why she is here if her current nigga sounds so solid on paper
>says he is horrible socially and barely knows how to touch her in public without sperging
>took forever to try and fuck her and when he did was horrible at it
>doesn't really try to fuck her often
>apparently he has low sex drive and fucks like a virgin
>laugh my ass off as I penetrate her once more

Which one of you ALPHAs did I cuck yesterday?

GET BLACKPILLED NOW
THIS IS WHAT PEAK PERFORMANCE LOOKS LIKE

Attached: cWt4Fnz.png (498x208, 24K)

I know what it'll do...

Attached: 78bmpyb_fwo.jpg (2136x1424, 974K)

because you need to try, fucking reatard. Women don't come to you. You go to women.

Attached: 1527764311643.jpg (168x173, 7K)

You idiots need studies to confirm this? Pick up any romance book or see the poster for any romance movie
you'll see what female desire looks like

Pic related is what women fancy

Attached: 03-SFB-Richard-Pier-Petit.jpg (800x1053, 122K)

>powerful thighs.
go away Mark

Note how it starts with the face and then moves on to the body
facelets BTFO

>fat
>women desire you sexually

lol no. Maybe your ex because she knows you, but women find fat men repulsive and you know that

I hope my tax money does not go to pay for these retarded studies.

>How is anyone of Jow Forums complaining about this?
Because Jow Forums is now mostly fatties and dyel incels.
Obviously.

Anonnes, God of Shortness and Jealousy

>cues

Literally means to just have wide shoulders. Being fit is irrelevant. It's all genetics

>how physicall strong he looks
>how tall he is
>how lean he is
2/3 not bad

More news at 11:
Women prefer strong willed confident men over weak betas

So broke fatass hopeless construction worker living in the projects brags about shedding his last shred of dignity as he goes on a drug fueled bender fucking his former fatass ex while she cheats on her new bf. And which part of this story are you so lmao proud of exactly?

Dated a girl like this in my early teen years. She was absolutely fucked in the head, but goddamn did she suck dick like a hoover. She was always immature and had an unhealthy love for Harley Quinn to the point of going days talking like her.

who gives a fuck what women think. what do traps think?

>5'6"
>miniature
no doubt

Would you refer to a single molecule as water? Water is the body compromised of billions of molecules, hence why a drop of water has a singular description rather than being referred to as water. If a small amount is separated, its classification changes.

>tfw lucked out with the broad shoulder gene

Is it really a trap if you're actively seeking them out?

Go lift. Thinking isn't for you.

>how tall he is
One-Eight Zero Zero-Two Seven Three-Eight Two Five Five

Kek

hahahahahaha fucking manlets we’ve found your saint

especially on the loli perspective. get harvard on the phone quick

Jokes on you user I got her and every other woman I ever was with while also repulsively bloatmaxxed.

non and all of it, I gave away things such as pride long ago, I'm just trying to tell whichever one of you who fits that description to dump his whore.

MY DICK - YOURS

Yes, user, even a single molecule of water is water

Based. The whole study is undermined so heavily by anchoring bias: When the only thing the thots have to go on is gains, obviously more gains (within reason) = better.
But gains aren't seen in isolation. We'd need to study muscles + bad face vs no muscles + good face, or money +/- muscles etc.

>within the entire range of the sample there was no indication of an upper limit.
He already mentioned that
>None of the students were body builder/strong man big. They were your average college students, the skinny fats, the chris-chans, the dyels, and the bros.
Unless we can see if actual swole guys were present, we can't comment on this.