Is he cringe or based?

Is he cringe or based?

Attached: vg1.jpg (722x722, 55K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=IaEJvtriFns&t=
youtube.com/watch?v=cDaP-Zg-Ulo
youtube.com/watch?v=oRj6DqxN_uw
youtube.com/watch?v=3bPRtTVMOfg
discord.gg/TUmjAWP
rose-hulman.edu/~brandt/Chem330/Gluconeogenesis.pdf
ijbs.com/v06p0691.htm
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

dios mio...

He doesn't give two fucks and goes after literally everybody so he has my respect for that at least. I started liking him legitimately when he took Lex Fitness's b8 and staunched him at that fitness event.

wow, OBAMA LOOKS LIKE THAT?

yes

AverageAmerican.png

I hate him.

I'm not a vegan and don't intent to ever become one, but he's pretty smart and can make most of the fitness industry look like mongs which is pretty entertaining

Based

He's both cringe and based

>arching that hard for a 3pl8 bench
lol

He cherrypicks studies to suit his views
That Carneval dude destroyed him in their debate

hes a standard booty blasted bleeding heart vegan. he can only exist as cringe

EL PUTO DUENDE VERDE

hehehe

Attached: unnamed.jpg (900x900, 76K)

he really isn't

He's fucking dying is what he is

He’s a psychopath

El terror del jardin....

Post "that" webm lads

He's cringe, until he takes the neckpill

Attached: neckpill.jpg (300x168, 8K)

Based

His videos about the fitness industry are ok. His vlogging videos are the epitomy of cringe. Dude overall just seems pretty unstable.

This is probably my favorite video of his
youtube.com/watch?v=IaEJvtriFns&t=

>Look mom, I posted it again!
youtube.com/watch?v=cDaP-Zg-Ulo

I find his vlogs comfy for whatever reason

whoa so strong
youtube.com/watch?v=oRj6DqxN_uw

He really looks bigger here than in the pics posted on this thread

>all these shills promoting this hack

Who is Jeff Niggard? Some sickly vegan?

Because he's 26 in the video and most pictures are posted from when he was 22.

Would you debate him Jow Forums?

No I have no interest in having some retard ask me retarded questions designed to lower my IQ.

But he is a psychotic nutjob who is proud of the fact he castrated himself. All Vegans are insane so he's a natural leader for them.

There's NO WAY that this guys is natty.

he should team up with blaha and shoot up a fitness expo

I had never noticed the severity until you posted this. This is why I took it. If you're even sorta built with a pencil neck, it's a touch off putting.

Attached: LaAmericano.gif (409x250, 2.52M)

Let me put it like this. This el goblino tried to film his grandfather having a heart attack and wanted to upload it to youtube because he ate meat.

youtube.com/watch?v=3bPRtTVMOfg

>yfw you realise that VG is doing pretty well for a mulatto that grew up without a father

Attached: 1543547892246.png (775x743, 1.13M)

Seriously man this gave me a new hatred for vegans. WTF they do not need to go so far to shill their meme diet. NO ONE FUCKING CARES EAT WHAT YOU FUCKING WANT

Fitness as a hobby includes overall health. CT Fletcher is on his second heart transplant.

He unironically has a point though

Zero basic human decency though.

basic human decency went out the window a long time ago bruh

His heart attack has nothing to do with eating meat. You can have a heart attack from overeating pasta

Wow he's a lot smaller than I thought

cmon just do meatless momndays cmon now eamt can bebad but good if hou do less evne if not all of it less is good because if you yhink of the eniiroment carbon impacg

>not understanding flourscent lighting
>6'3 is manlet and OP is DYEL

meanwhile ur 100% a twink or a fatty

cringe.

>makes a living doing shitty vegan drama videos / begging for money on patreon
>ugly fat leech wife
>decade of lifting, lifts are intermediate at best 405 dl pr kek
>anti natalist scum, tries to fill the void of not having a family by turning his apartment into a zoo

T H I S
H
I
S

Fact is he's one of the best fitness youtubers right now and anons have to pull shit from years ago or make cheap adhominems
to bring him down.

meatcucks want to suck his dick for the animal protein

He a fucking idiot that refused to debate meta-ethics in a debate about the ethics of meat eating. Absolute fucking idiot desu

discord.gg/TUmjAWP

Attached: 1544417233034.png (701x343, 396K)

The guy is literally a sociopath, if you can't see that you have some fucking problems

sorry that he said mean things about your favorite youtube "fitness" daddy, it truly is disgusting behaviour from him

you have no fucking idea of what you're talking about, 3 plates is much stronger than what the average person is lifting at the gym regardless of the time they've been training for, and only "russian girls" who abuse form and technique and use kevlar shirts are able to even unrack that weight.

so many words for "I'm too dumb and uneducated to debate a nigger"
keep coping though

Cringe. Also hit gay debate buddy 'Ask Yourself' is cringe as well. He looks like a malnourished twink but he gives diet advice advocating veganism.

Pretty well? He is multi-year-long depressed and cannot see it is linked to his diet and does not change his diet. His lifts in the gym are pathetic for the time he's been working out and he has gained tremendous amounts of fat recently

Attached: 9203ea4041a11fb52330cc77b3928a1f.png (408x728, 502K)

based

How? The founder of the Vegan American Society died of a heart attack...

>he still thinks heart attacks are linked to cholesterol , should we tell him?

atherosclerosis develops from chelesterol which leads to heart attacks, mong.

he was also a fat fucking indian with a double chin, being fat has a far greater impact in one's health than eating or not eating cholesterol, because the fatter you are the higher your baseline cholesterol and the higher your levels of inflammation and oxidative stress lmao.

Sugar caused atherosclerosis and damage to your blood vessels. The notion that cholesterol causes artery damage is a boomer belief. Cholesterol is a anti-inflammatory helper, and it tries to help the inflammation caused by sugar. Just because you find cholesterol at the scene doesn't mean it caused it. Higher cholsterol is just a marker for the helping of inflammation caused by someone else.

Attached: fasting_blood_sugar.jpg (762x555, 145K)

Wow a fat vegan, not a surprise...Hard to find any fat carnivores or keto ... wonder why

image for you

yeah, he got tired of killing with drones and decided to get yolked and kill people himself

Shawn baker had pre diabetic levels of blood glucose FASTED, while eating 0 sugar.
You also seem to be doing what you claim others are doing, which is over simplifying the mechanisms at play in the development of a disease. Usually what causes high blood sugar levels is obesity or fatty liver disease, or the over consumption of trans and saturated fats.
The higher your blood cholesterol the faster and more likely atherosclerosis occurs, it's not even up to debate at this point.
We have data on people who are born with insanely high cholesterol levels with NORMAL inflammation markers, I'm talking like people who are in their teens with LDL-C of 400mg/dl, and people like these have an average lifespan of 30-40 years.
There's then the people with bizarrely even higher levels of LDL-C, around 500mg/dl, who usually die at 30 or younger than that from - you guessed it - heart attacks.
It's impossible to have blood sugar levels that high if you have a normal bodyfat% unless you're already genetically fucked to begin with too, for example I drink a lot of chocolate milk which gives me around 200g of sugar(not carbs, but sugar) a day, and my fasting blood glucose score is below 68(which is low even for healthy people).

>yes, if I post random, boomer, mythical assumptions, he must beleive me. It is not I who is wrong, it is he!

Attached: 1528535999892.jpg (633x640, 87K)

hard to get fat when you hate eating or when you're eating mostly protein.

>fatty liver disease is caused by eating fat.
Yet, when people want to create fatty livers in animals (foie gras) they force feed grains and sugar, which if the fastest method discovered over hundreds of years of trial and error.
Makes you think...

A family member of mine got a heart infarction at 59 that almost developed into a full on fatal heart attack on a non vegan diet, it wasn't the sugar according to his physician since his blood glucose levels are normal.
It's not just "CHOLESTEROL GOOD SUGAR BAD XDD".

>all this idiotic reasoning to justify guzzling down 200 fucking grams of sugar from chocolate milk
jesus christ

Yes.. I'm going to believe his local GP over the studies and other doctors I read...

Dietary cholesterol doesn't affect blood cholesterol.

Now look at humans instead of animals with completely different metabolism and digestion to our own.
We have clear mechanistic data and clinical interventions that show that eating saturated and trans fats increase liver fat accumulation and visceral fat in general more than other nutrients such as starchy and sugary carbs and unsaturated fats.
Furthermore some animals do indeed get issues when fed grains or sugar, but humans are not one of them, lots of high sugar diet experiments have been done on humans which fail to show fatty liver occurances unless fed insane ammounts alongside some fats.

dietary fat does though.

but high blood cholesterol is a good thing if you're in ketosis.

fatty liver results from impaired fat metabolism and polyunsaturated fat intake.
if you get in ketosis often, your fat metabolism won't be impaired.

Yeah, and yet my blood glucose levels are better than most people's, because I barely eat any saturated and trans fats.
Makes you think
>over the studies
which ones?
>other doctors
Who?
What doctor unironically claims with certainty that sugar causes atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease? Only larping paleo retards do.
>Dietary cholesterol doesn't affect blood cholesterol.
It does but the effect is minimal, the main issue is when you are eating fats that inhibit somewhat cholesterol metabolism.

well, impaired fat metabolism, PUFAs, fructose, and alcohol.

if you don't eat often, eat whole foods, don't overeat, and exercise, chances are your blood glucose will be normal irrespective of saturated fat intake (up to a point).

>pufa intake causes fatty liver disease
it doesn't though, in fact we only have dietary interventions that show the exact opposite of what you believe.
>impaired fat metabolism
pufa's are easier to oxidize for energy than saturated and trans fats though, that's the root cause of the problem.
Not only that but we also have livestock data showing the same in a variety of different animals even non mammals like chickens who have better health when they eat more pufa's and less saturated fats, as long as their omega 3:6 ratio isn't too imbalanced ofc.

To this day there isn't a single dietary intervention or clinical trial that shows that saturated fats are in anyway favourable for the metabolic or cardiovascular health of humans, not a single one, for a good reason, they just are not.

Attached: Omega 6 vs butter metabolic health.jpg (643x292, 69K)

Your blood glucose level isn't "better" than other people's. It's just a short term indicator of your blood glucose levels based on what you ate recenly and how your body responds to it. The idea that you think drinking 200g of sugar from chocolate and your blood sugar not rising is healthy, it very worrying.

Do your own research. Cholesterol causing heart disease is such a boomer myth. Indigenous and Inuit eat mostly choletserol based foods, yet their heart disease rates are much lower than modern day humans.

False, humans have identical liver functionality, and I challenge you to produce supporting data for your claims. There are plenty of studies examining standard diets and sedentary lifestyles, but dietary cholesterol or fat consumption is not isolated and controlled for in those studies. The idea that complex life supporting functions in the body can be boiled down to a syllogism is laughable. Anyone who has read the available literature and examined the methodology (not simply twisting abstracts to support their presuppositions) can see that the data we have is insufficient to account for varied diets.

>my fasting glucose is good because I don't eat much fat...
What accounts for those who can boast the same on a high fat diet?
Correlation does not equal causation.

I have a glucose meter, I check it when I have meals and it is rarely above 105 after 60m of eating a meal, it's either genetics or the diet is working for me, regardless those are my results.
High carbs make me feel horny and energetic.

>I have a glucose meter.
Now it makes sense. You are diabetic and trying to justify the shitty diet that got you there and using your insulin resistance as "proof" that high carbs are not detrimental to health. I guess that is easier than admitting that your poor choices are the problem.

>always posting an image of that single study, kek

yes, PUFAs oxidize easily, but it's an unregulated process. look up the reverse electron transport chain, and how it affects different types of fat.
epileptic children were put on a high PUFA diet when researchers found out it could achieve higher ketone levels.
but the children became very sick on it.
it's not a surprise we shouldn't be eating industrial seed oil...

saturated fat protects against alcohol induced fatty liver.

oh, and notice how studies showing PUFAs are good are always short studies.
it's the chronic intake of PUFAs that's detrimental rather than acute.

>AntI-natALIsm BaD

acute (intake).

I know, I was just telling you or that person that it's not as simple as some people make it seem, sugar isn't bad by itself, maybe if you have bad genetics for a high sugar diet or if you're obese or have a fatty liver or something which are issues that aren't caused by sugar at least directly.

>identical
rose-hulman.edu/~brandt/Chem330/Gluconeogenesis.pdf
This is just looking at CNG and it already shows differences between humans and animals like cows.
ijbs.com/v06p0691.htm
This goes somewhat into depth about the differences in pig/cow/human/rat lipid metabolism.

>diabetic
I'm not the one with diabetic blood markers, I don't take insulin or any medication whatsoever.
You're just accusing me of shit because what I tell you breaks your view on human health and nutrition.

>he's using that pic again kek I still can't refute it though
kek
>saturated fat protects
it doesn't, it helps causing it

>short studies where people are fed controlled meals
There's mechanistic data that shows that saturated fats are inferior for pretty much every metric of health, that go right along with these "short term" studies.
You on the other hand only have theories.