WHEN THE FUCK IS THE GOVERNMENT GOING TO CRACKDOWN ON SEX "WORK"?
Roastie whores should not be getting paid just to open their legs or send you a saucy png of her in some meme japanese lingerie. These worthless holes arent even attractive most of the time and prey on beta virgins who do nothing but play videogames and jerkoff, which is pretty much the same as taking advantage of the mentally handicapped.
>Not wanting a free marketplace of pussy and sexbots
What are you gay?
Women don't deserve money just for having a hole, tha tis my point.
Come here OP
you little shitlet
I hate prostitution as well but if you're gonna blame anyone, blame men. There's a huge market for them. If there wasn't a market, they wouldn't find success.
I suppose not. But if people want to buy sex from prostitutes or pngs of girls in Japanese lingerie so what?
>men throw their money at women to get them naked
>somehow the women are at fault for these transactions
Not my prob, bob.
I spend my money on drugs, not hookers.
No you don't understand.
Holes post pictures of their holes, no direct contact whatsoever, in exchange for money and dare to call themselves "sex workers".
The government needs to step it at this point.
The diseased for the broken.
Be better than them. The only reason it bothers you is because you're too poor to afford it and have to pay more to get it.
Pussy isn't worth current prices. When it becomes more mainstream and a normal marries guy who's reasonably fit and adjusted can pick up a mid 20's sugar baby for a couple hundred a month, spergs like you will still be in the hundreds for an hour market. Get used to your place, bud. Or improve to the point that pussy is no longer worth that much to you and by then you should be doing well enough to get it.
so you seriously think it should be illegal to sell porn dms? you need more reasons than "its kinda pathetic"
They did though you can't get escorts online anymore in america. now they use tinder.
>exploiting what is essentially an evolutionary built in addiction to extract wealth from men
Yeah it's morally repugnant.
>prostitutes are the easiest way robots could get sex
>most robots hate prostitutes and prostitution in general and act like they're too good for whores
lol you guys crack me up
Being so mentally weak that you fall for a carnal vice is morally repugnant. Get your priorities straight you miscreant.
I guess when you can't make the distinction between a woman and a hole you'd find the humor in something like that.
hookers are a lot cheaper than real woman. why are you complaining? What do you want more dudes to lose half their stuff in a divorce because they cant get access to sex otherwise?
It's an engineered weakness you cock gobbling gaylord. Men are literally honed by evolution to be exploitable by women. Retards like you who just deny basic biology and push all responsibility back onto men when it's women who knowingly use these desires for their personal gain make me sick.
be honest OP
are you an inbred religious ghoul?
men who have to resort to hookers don't have to worry about divorce because nobody's going to marry them anyway.
>I guess when you can't make the distinction between a woman and a hole you'd find the humor in something like that.
Okay I'll try and see if I can show you why I find this funny. You think paying for sex is wrong, so what in your mind is an appropriate way to get sex? If sex is not a service one can exchange for money, then what is the exchange rate?
from each according to her ability to each according to his needs.
Being behoven to a base carnal instinct like that is hilariously weak. Take control of your own body, for fucks sake. I know you don't have the will to not go to mcdonald every day but at least masturbate often enough to not be a danger to the opposite sex.
Two different people, bud.
There's a difference between "wrong" and "gross". Whores are gross. It isn't wrong, or bad, or anything like that. Dependent on who you are and where you are in society, it might even be a positive. But for people like me, it's gross as fuck.
However, I have paid for a cute college girl's car repair for a week of service. Or a young mom's diapers for similar. Fetish for young naive women or something like that, not sure. But certainly not for whores.
You are by far the most delusional person I've seen regarding sex on this board and that's saying something. You seem to think that just because you're not giving women money directly, you're not paying for sex. You are, it's not really any different. And calling it "gross" is effectively the same as saying it's wrong and bad, that's how value judgments work, user. Something is bad because it is gross.
It seems to me that you just play semantic word games to excuse your behavior and make it seem logically consistent even though it isn't. You routinely pay women for sex, but do it in a way that circumnavigates the legal definition of prostitution so you think you're not engaging in exactly the same behavior.
I never said I wasn't paying for sex. Just not from a whore.
A rotten apple is gross. Is that wrong or bad?
A semen soaked washcloth after a fun night is gross. Is that wrong or bad?
Politics are gross, now. Are they wrong or bad?
etc.
You must be a progressive. You guys are pretty great at obliterating absolutely any nuance in the English language to suit your own means. Those "semantic word games" are called "using the language correctly".
And circumnavigating the legality of it was only a pleasant bonus. Not in any way an intended outcome.