So it's ok to circumcise a man but if you cut off a womans clitoris thats bad? what?

I find it more aesthetic. And don't care about what npc's think is good or bad.

Attached: RentFree.gif (721x575, 1.24M)

there is nothing "more aesthetic" about a mutilated body part

There is nothing aesthetic about ruining a perfectly fine perfectly working organ. You are enabling a disgusting practice of making a profit off the torture of boys.

Attached: 1536976954752.jpg (1874x1759, 469K)

The men got sort of the shit end of the stick in that there's little long-lasting effects of male circumcision. With female circumcision, there's often issues with continued infection, incontinence, and cyst formation. The latter occurs even in the less extreme forms. Male circumcision would no doubt be seen as horrid if men got cysts later in life related to the procedure. It's true that circumcision of men is barbaric, but that's a big reason between people's differing opinion of the two.

Cutting off a clit is more like cutting off the entire penis. Plus, male parts and female parts are completely different.
But you guys will keep complaining and memeing regardless of anything else.

I'm not really trying to start any argument, but the New Testament was pointing out that circumcision is only a requirement for those bound to the old covenant. It's simply saying there's no reason to be circumcised unless you want to be Jewish. It was saying that to do so was binding yourself to the old rites which wasn't in most Christian's best interest. Nothing wrong with Judaism. Most people would make very bad Jews though.

>Cutting off a clit is more like cutting off the entire penis...
I mean, OP has got a point that cutting off 'only a little of the penis' is still pretty awful sounding.

>So it's ok to circumcise a man but if you cut off a womans clitoris thats bad? what?

Jews unironically. No joke this bullshit was started by some insane nomadic goat hearders

Well if we're being specific, none of the actual penis is being cut off. It's just the skin, the "sheath" of the penis.

You are objectively wrong.

noharmm.org/IDcirc.htm#keratinization

>none of the actual penis is being cut off. It's just the skin, the "sheath" of the penis.
So are you.

Attached: 1525299041775.jpg (637x423, 35K)

>Also God can't talk to you unless you cut it off.

If you believe in God then why would you believe he mad you imperfect to the point you needed to cut your junk off? Obviously God is all knowing, omnipresent and perfect why would he do this? You know I don't see any god hacking little boys junck up just men and the worst of them are are Orthodox Jews who's practice has them taking the foreskin in their mouth and biting it off. Fucking pedophiles wet dream

>snipping a female's labia is disgusting, barbaric, and needs to be banned world-wide
>chopping off a male's foreskin is actively promoted and recommended in place of basic hygiene and safe sex practices

Thinking it's more aesthetic is actually what normie NPCs think, sweaty.

Attached: 1385779473595.png (317x293, 45K)

The first is ok if it's medically required. Usually it's not, though

lol my friends mom made him get circumsized at 14 because he had dick cheese

You watch too much (((porn))). It's fucking ripped apart genitalia.

>could've just taken a shower
>instead get your penis mutilated
Why are women allowed to make decisions concerning things they know nothing of other than "but the TV said it was healthy!!!"?

I bet you didn't know that male circumcision is one of the major causes of erectile disfunction dysfunctional later in life. See the head of your penis/glands are supposed to stay covered and moist but being circumcised leaves them to dry out causing Keratinization over time and eventually loss of feeling. Good for Viagra sales not so much for you

That's a bit of an overstatement, removing the clitoral hood is the true analogue. Of course that's completely illegal too. Female privilege is real

>foreskin is not part of the penis

Attached: ConfusedBlackGentleman.png (300x256, 88K)

Mutilation (including cliterodectomy or bobbitation) is never OK.
Modification (including true circumcision) is usually OK. However if it results in scar tissue that would be a hazard for childbirth, it's not OK.

Then why can't we cut off the hood of the clit? I mean it would be cleaner and more easily accessible but over time it would cause problems due to lack of lubrication because it should be covered like the glans of the penis. I mean who cares if the clit gets keratinization like penises do and they lose sensation later in life. Am I right?

Seething dogdicks.

I guess you really are more sensitive.

Bitch, I am circumcised so I know it's fucking terrible and those who are intact should always know they're superior and all the hate they get are from jealous retards and Jews.

Also, do you kikes have any other arguments than "muh dickcheese"? Oh don't act like "more sensitive" isn't the exact same thing.

>Ill just splatter a tad bit of pilpul to define the stuff I like "modification"and the stuff I dislike "mutilation".

>all these ignorant people saying female circumcision is always worse than Male circumcision

The most sensitive, nerve-dense, parts of the penis are removed in circumcision. The ridged band, a unique section of skin that contains around 21,000 nerve endings and is heavily responsible in pleasuring women during intercourse, is always removed in the procedure. The frenulum and frenulum delta, the two most sensitive parts of the penis for fine touch and the most important stimulation points in letting men "feel" their oncoming orgasm, are always damaged and sometimes completely amputated during the procedure. To make matters worse, the bits that weren't outright ripped off are now exposed to the outside, as opposed to being protected by outer foreskin like they should be. Over the course of a mans life, these areas continue to lose sensitivity as they become keratinized. It's not a coincidence the top 3 users of ED medication hail from USA, S.Korea, and Israel.

If you were circumcised at birth, consider looking into manually inducing mitosis in order to grow out your inner foreskin remnant and penis shaft skin. This is called foreskin restoration, and the results are life changing, both physically and emotionally.

Attached: 1540056278727.png (125x120, 34K)

>I am circumcised

So am I, but I don't have any problems associated with it. Sorry 'bout the hack job wackjob.

Yeah because you don't know how good it was before hand. I don't either technically but hearing it from others and I doubt mutilation in any case makes things better.

>you don't know
>I don't either
>but hearing it from others

This truely is your board.

You're wrongly assuming that modification equates to what I like. But the real difference between modification and mutilation is how it impacts on the functioning.

And FWIW I had never heard of pilpul before I read your post.

Both are bad, but in the case of a woman's clitoris, the male contemporary would be the head of the penis, not just the foreskin. You have to remember that a woman's clitoris is essentially just a micropenis. The only reason it's not larger is due to lack of prenatal testosterone.

The female contemporary of a man's foreskin would be the woman's clitorical hood. If it was just the hood being removed, I would agree with them being equally bad, but obviously female circumcision is worse.

Attached: circumsized _01.jpg (645x484, 28K)

>but obviously female circumcision is worse.
Both are bad. Male circumcision removes all erogenous tissue.

Attached: 1526658663009.jpg (960x720, 72K)

Another circumcised vagina.

Attached: circumsized _02.jpg (782x889, 286K)

This unironically looks better than the vast majority of pussies. How do I get a white circumcised gf? I don't want a nigger or a sand variation thereof.

Woah, that's what they look like? Let's bring female circumcision to the US, that's way more aesthetic. What do we need to do to get it done, just a couple muslim-backed studies that say it's healthier? The jews did it with mgm, shouldn't be that hard, right

thats a nice looking pucci

Attached: 1520568032579.png (356x384, 236K)

It's so hard and time consuming... What are your methods of making it easier?

That looks better than normal bagina

>The jews did it with mgm
Actually...here in the West, we actually have this guy to blame. He was the one who popularized it as a way of deterring masturbation. Yes....THAT John Harvey Kellogg...the same one that established the breakfast cereal company is the one responsible for making circumcision popular amongst American goyim. He also had this weird obsession with yogurt enemas. The guy barely ever fucked his wife, and I don't think any of the children he raised were his. The man was a quack who too many people listened to.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Harvey_Kellogg

Why do Americans and Canadians often circumcise their children, but Europeans don't? Dr. John Harvey Kellogg.

Attached: Dr. John Harvey Kellogg [1942].jpg (371x493, 16K)

Fuck off with your imaginary friend, kike.

>Seething dogdicks.
You should stab your eyeballs out so you don't have dog eyes either.

Yes I know, lingering puritan ideals and Kellogg brought it to the forefront originally. But if you're pretending that jews don't play a huge part in perpetuating it once the puritan ideals died out in America, you're not looking at it honestly

I know it's tempting to not talk about the jewish aspect of it, it becomes too easy for everyone else to just cast it off as all anti-semitic ramblings, but they definitely have a big part in this

I'm not disagreeing with you either, but given the way history panned out it's important to lay the blame where it is due. If it hadn't been for Kellogg, this wouldn't be as big of a problem as it is as it would likely not be widespread beyond religious/ethnic practice.

how did his mum know.

i just cannot fathom the thought process of a mother, holding her precious newborn baby in her arms and thinking k time to chop of part of his dick.

absolutely barbaric. im glad its less widespread here in the UK. ive never even seen a cut penis

>his mum never performed the after-bath smeg check
stinky boy

Attached: Smegma-Sega.png (1882x384, 59K)

Reply to this post to feel sorry for fellow Amerifriends brainwashed by their jewish overlords

Attached: 1536808752377.png (459x349, 160K)

Both are wrong, but it's not even close to the same thing. If incels understood this, circumcision would be a lot less popular. Why you would want to equate the two, I don't know.

>mother always told me you have to peel the skin back in the bath to make sure your dicks clean
>stupid fucking roastie didnt realize I DIDNT HAVE SKIN TO PULL BACK BECAUSE SHE LISTENED TO THE JEW DOCTORS THAT TOLD HER TO HAVE IT REMOVED
FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK I HATE THIS I HATE THIS SO MUCH GODDAMNIT I AM A FUCKING MUTILATED MAN WITH A USELESS UGLY DRY DILDO FOR A DICK
Foregen fucking never those people are hacks and stem cells will never solve the frenulum issue

Gentle reminder that any sort of body modification(mutilation) is normie-tier.

The main reason is because bad things happening to women is awful but no one gives a fuck about bad things happening to men.

They're completely different and incomparable

>uncutfgas don't get listened to
>cutfags either block their ears or wallow in despair
>meanwhile the whole issue is people letting women have a say in what to do to their son's new body

Attached: 1520526714908.jpg (900x1200, 281K)

>tfw low and tight cut
Hated how my dick looked before I started foreskin restoration.

>hard and time consuming
That's not the way to look at it.
All it really takes is adding something into your daily routine, about 2 minutes, 3-10 times per day.

Yikers!

So if you're not cut.........................

Who hurt you?

Attached: 389529s.jpg (231x251, 11K)

Mostly because taking a girls clit out its like taking your glands out, not your foreskin

>he thinks the glans is the most sensitive part of the penis

Yeah, OP really botched this thread. There's a point in there, but he drew the wrong analogy. It should have been:
>So it's ok to circumcise a man but completely illegal to remove a woman's clitoral hood, or even perform a symbolic pinprick for a drop of blood? what?

Clitorectomy/infibulation is not the only type of FGM, they're all rightfully banned. The same privilege should be extended to males

Who here /ForeskinRestoration/?

You'll never get your frenulum or ridged band back, but you can be rid of your dry tight sore dick. Before, I could get tiny cuts on my dick from the friction of jerking off because there was so little gliding motion. I wouldn't be able to fap for a few days and I would get so frustrated.

I'm not nearly restored yet, but even the progress I've made has been a world of difference. There's actually a gliding motion not, so I can fap as much as I want and never worry about being sore, and orgasms feel more intense. And it's also partly from feeling better mentally about my dick that it makes masturbation in general so much more enjoyable. Only problem is that restoration can take years depending on your dick size, type of cut, methods, and dedication, but to me it's been worth it.

Attached: MikeMatei'sBulge.jpg (642x411, 79K)

>tfw using a foreskin retainer and smelling that natural musk that uncut fags get when taking it off
Feels good man

Attached: 1518638599337.jpg (645x773, 57K)

Here.
My problem is I'm 4" soft and have to grow a fuck-ton of skin.
My goal won't be finished for a while, but all the permanent benefits like you described are very nice.

>There's actually a gliding motion now

I'm cut but have never been without that gliding motion your talking about. I think I may have started masturbating so early (5th grade) that it just worked itself out that way.

Holy shit the idea of an erect skin stick with no glide really is worth being spooked about.

its obviously not the same thing but I think you know why we do it to boys and not girls

Attached: IMG_20171114_142800.jpg (393x395, 47K)

>tfw went from being erect with no gliding to finally having that
I had to re-learn how to masturbate.
It took me a fucking year to get accustomed to, it was so different. So wonderfully different.

Most of it's just how lucky you got and how much skin the doc left you with. Even so, it's not quite the gliding motion you're meant to have. Cutfags have to do a lot of pulling up to get a full stroke to the glans instead of just pulling down. Over time it can cause pubes to start growing up the shaft or the ballsack skin to stretch farther onto the shaft from that constant up-pulling

You're right about that.
I usually don't even care, or take a minute or two to trim it every couple months, but it only goes up to a certain point.

Anyone have knowledge in suing the ones who did the circumcision? Maybe I will make a thread

boys are the only perfection in universe. Any mention of male circumcision that doesn't mention Semitic genocide is cuckkked

Attached: 85982ad1-434e-4794-9e92-3b1de4ab41f0-092718Maddox_Ritch_21.jpg (534x712, 38K)

Former high and tight here.
Used to have painful erections, I thought it was normal for the skin to get as tight as it did.
It took seven fucking years but I finally have enough skin to fully cover the glands while flaccid....
except my rigid band is still missing and my frenulum was severed loose so the skin wont stay in place. It'll probably take six more months to train the skin how to rest.
It sucks so much was lost in an 8 minute procedure signed away by my dipshit parents.

Totally worth the effort though, a girl sucked my dick the other day and it made my whole body twitch. I'm happy that I can feel more and in time my glands will dekeratinized and hopefully still work when I'm older. But I'm sad that I'll never be able to know what it's like to be whole.

[gas the kikes racewar now]

Male genital mutilation is wrong and reprehensible, but at the same time you're uneducated. Very early in Genesis, (((God Himself))) takes this one dude named Abram for a walk and literally tells him "Okay Abram I need you to cut the foreskin off your dick and make sure that the same thing happens to every other male in your household. Also let's call you Abraham from now on, instead." Abraham immediately complies, since this is God and all, and so begins the original sin of Abrahamic religion which still poisons our thoughts and culture to this very day.

You can't see the difference? What? You're a fucking idiot?

Jow ForumsMGTOW is thata way