so if you remember, I decided to make a nice boy okcupid account to see how hard it is for the average white guy to get dates. This is day 2 of having this account and so far:
>received 2 responses to messages
>received 5 likes
keep in mind, I only pursued thin and hot girls, emphasis on white and asians.
Other urls found in this thread:
okcupid.com
en.m.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
This is the first girl who messaged me today, she is Filipino and speaks like 6 languages.
here's just my notifications from today (3am on day 2).
this isnt niceboy
this is literally cuckboy. theres a difference between being """nice""" as the normalniggers put it and this cuck shit. literally groveling for the opportunity to have a chance with women
>this doesn't count because you didn't make his personality this exact way i think men should act
okay, you make one then. I just made him jokingly self-deprecating.
this profile actually doesn't sound that bad. sounds like a guy making fun of himself. also you have to make him jewish
no, a cuckboy would message women like okcupid.com
not caring that "she" has fucking AIDS and a dick
I'm leaving it listed as agnostic but for all intents and purposes if anyone asks he has a jewish family.
okay very good very good
What's your range limit set at? I don't mean specifically where just how far?
Chances are there is somebody interested but in a ridiculous distance that's not viable.
I would message him.
But that's because I work in Beverly Hills and I'm stuck commuting from the Valley.
100 miles, but i also set him in a highly populated area
most of the girls are within 10 miles.
Oh right you set it for in california. It's not going to work. Most of those women are drug addicts and or alcoholics. You might get one weirdo mentally ill tranny that's a man dressed up like a woman message you.
They're after the money. Programmers make quite a bit. Try something more onions like Starbucks barista next time.
Bingo that's why I was wondering about the location. He made the guy sound so unappealing the majority of females would only see him as a mark to rip off for money.
I would think most of OkC's users are from California, so 2 messages are fucking nothing dude. Besides, that filipina is probably in it to get a green card/nationality through marriage. Try this with a chad catfish account, you'll get at least 200 likes in 24 hours.
lol they probably think he's rich, he also lives in one of the most populated areas in the country, so you're kind of cheating a bit.
lol.
I mean I don't know what that would prove.
I wouldn't matter if you said he was a barista or an assembly worker. They all translate that into "loser".
some guy who looks like the OP pic needs to be making six figures to get any semblance of interest from women
>received 2 responses to messages
>received 5 likes
Better than I expected. What was the other girl like that responded? Do have an idea if the likes are from bots/prossies?
>All the cope ITT
You fags are just seething because OP btfo'd your ridicolous girls only go for chad worldview
This doesn't count because these women obviously see him as an exploitable paypig. Go make a version of this account with the guy as working retail at Walmart to control for this or admit to being disingenuous.
Now if only I lived in California and had a job making 6 figures..
And looks like even then, you are the one spamming messages and getting barely any replies
Guess what nigger, much like men, women find being with someone they don't find appealing on a personal level extremely grating. It's like saying guys will only date women with massive milkers. It's nice if she has them, but any dude will take someone they actually like over a bimbo they don't give a fuck about any day. Of course girls like it when their partner earns a lot of money, but almost none of them will want to be with them unless they also like them on a personal level.
Look around you, almost every normalfag above the age of 20 has had at least one girlfriend, and most of them aren't chads or rich.
>Beverly Hills CA
>high income region of a high population density area
>basically lots of hoes around who think you're rich
I live in bumfuck rural MA, and there's only like 12 women 18-25 in a 25 mile radius who aren't single mothers on okcupid
>Programmers make quite a bit
lmao
>much like men, women find being with someone they don't find appealing on a personal level extremely grating.
I never said anything to the contrary. That's why OP is full of shit.
The problem is the characteristics that women do find attractive. They're dangerous parasites that can't be trusted to make decisions for themselves.
>Of course girls like it when their partner earns a lot of money, but almost none of them will want to be with them unless they also like them on a personal level.
Almost all of them will, and your dipshit anecdotes are not proof to the contrary.
>Look around you, almost every normalfag above the age of 20 has had at least one girlfriend, and most of them aren't chads or rich.
Most of them are Brads, AKA not robots. Brads are nearly as undesirable as Chads.
>I only pursued thin and hot girls, emphasis on white and asians
He probably wouldn't do that though
invite them to some rented address, then murder them
That sounds like a terrible MO for a serial killer
You are such a turd burglar dmitri
And what will this prove? That women don't want to be with some good for nothing guy? Wow, so much effort to prove a well known fact.
Most more girls who messaged him.
>And what will this prove
It will prove that women arent interested in nice men???
From my experience with dating apps (at least the more respected ones like OKC and POF), women are looking for kind men with good personalities. OP kind of fucked it here by making the catfish account seem like he has a decent amount of money, making him superficially attractive in a sense.
Rather, it would be funny to see just how undersirable a nice guy who works retail at Walmart, volunteers at the soup kitchen, goes to church every Sunday, is close with his family, and is an exceptional conversationalist; would be.
I guarantee you he would get barely any matches, and the woman that would match with him would be bored by talking to him
>white
No woman is going to believe this is a real account.
This, you fucking retards just accept that you don't have a gf cos you are pice of shit not because "muh wimen are thots lmao"
>okcupid.com
Can you post screenshot, I can't open it.
No one should date someone working retail at Walmart.
>Of course girls like it when their partner earns a lot of money, but almost none of them will want to be with them unless they also like them on a personal level
Then how come tall Ricky from Walmart with twenty tattoos gets plenty of action on Tinder?
Because he makes the effort to message girls and created a profile with good photos?
But he still works at Walmart...and that poster said no one should date anyone working at Walmart?
If he is under 25 it's fine. Or if he's like a manager.
He didn't prove that wrong at all
I HAVEN'T HAD A GIRLFRIEND AND I'M OVER TWENTY ROOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
>or if
So as long as hes good looking or makes money...
So much for personality making a difference
"Average white guy"
You made up a scenario in your head and call it "proofs".
Yeah and you made a baseless generalization that no one should date anyone at Walmart, then went back and made an exception that people can date people working at Walmart, then you get mad at me for pointing out that your exception was based on superficial criteria.
Are you mentally handicapped or just booty blasted that I called you out?
It seems the only real definition of nice guy to women is attractive male i would fuck
They make at least 2x what I make ;_;
Have you ever interacted with a female in your entire life? The gold digger cliche applies to almost nobody. I don't have to prove that either, you insist that females are fundamentally different from males in that regard, burden of proof lies with you.
>Most of them are Brads, AKA not robots
Holy fuck lmao. Real people are not one dimensional archetypes. You're fucking delusional. Keep defending your cynical, biased worldview with your mental gymnastics, faggot.
>i don't have to prove anything lol
Watch as the normie defends his world from shattering.
I'm not defending him but i think you shouldn't boost your confidence by trolling/shitting on incels.
It's not really healthy either, you know.
Go and get a job that does that then. Learn coding, write something. You still have time friend.
This is because to many women (and guys) that is boring. Taking care of family is cool, but what else does he do? Having a good job is an indicator of commitment and will, so of course its desirable.
I'm a nerdy unattractive guy, so I should be fucked but I get pussy because its interesting to girls when you have meaningful passions that you pursue successfully.
>why do women want to be with successful men? this isn't FAIR
Diff. person. Obviously working at Wal-Mart isn't everything and many girls are thots. Still, personality is the baseline of long term relationships with women who aren't whores. Your personality is reflected in jobs, health, hygiene, and whatnot.
I'll find the study if you're skeptical, but most girls while they have a higher initial beauty standard are more lenient on looks in the long term. Males have a lower standard but expect the woman to stay there.
Tat-boy might get pussy but it'll be a lot tougher for a long term. Also note that marriage divorce rates are inversely proportional to the money you make.
$$$$
This thread almost makes me want to make an account on OKCupid but then when I really think about it, I don't want a gf because that would eat up all my free time and there are too many things that I want to do.
t. wizard
That's what you get for letting women openly post on this board.
Every single thread gets derailed into absolute shit within a couple of posts. The only threads that get any traction are the "fembot" larp threads.
Congratz.
>why don't you accept my ridiculous believes that i assert with no evidence
I'm just another khv, i just don't delude myself into thinking half the population are soulless parasites because i don't want to admit it's more likely something is wrong with me
>Your personality is reflected in jobs, health, hygiene, and whatnot
No, its not. Jobs are based on who you know, which is social. Health and hygiene are physical traits.
Why are you trying to muddy the waters? A guy like in OP pic related could have work at Walmart (or any minimum wage job) with decent health and hygiene, have an AMAZING personality but get no attention from girls. Why?
Because money and physical stats are far more important than personality. Personality is simply the thing that makes long term relationships bearable when the sex isnt as good anymore
>just another khv
Yeah, right. You type like a total normie. Own it, dont try and misrepresent your own argument to make yourself seem more empathetic
You hate virgins and incels and you believe there must be something wrong with them, when in reality youve just been very lucky with love
>who you know
>not how hard you worked to get to where you are in life
you are retarded
>retarded
Really? Are you unaware that the saying in business goes, its not what you know, but who you know?
When all businesses in all fields hire based on test scores, you have the right to call me retarded. At this point you are simply baiting because your ship is sinking
>I am looking for a forever home with a nice woman who loves cats, and maybe wine
That's the most pathetic thing I've read today, this is not an "average white guy".
>the only career path is business
nice one, brainlet
>uses reddit spacing
>accuses others of being normies while unironically using the term normie instead of normalfag
Fucking kek, go back to r/incels, newshitter
Are you aware that there are companies out there that specifically find jobs for people with technical skills? I'm an engineer who had no contacts at all and that's how I got my first job.
>Have you ever interacted with a female in your entire life?
I've had several girlfriends.
>The gold digger cliche applies to almost nobody.
The gold digger cliche applies to almost every woman, whether they care to admit it or not.
>I don't have to prove that either, you insist that females are fundamentally different from males in that regard, burden of proof lies with you.
Incorrect. The burden of proof lies with you to prove that individuals with different chromosomes behave similarly.
>Most of them are Brads, AKA not robots
Holy fuck lmao. Real people are not one dimensional archetypes.
Real people incredibly one dimensional. If you unironically believe we're all special snowflakes even boomers and shitlibs think you're a joke at this point.
>You're fucking delusional. Keep defending your cynical, biased worldview with your mental gymnastics, faggot.
Keep calling me a nigger faggot for disagreeing with your naived cucked biases, champ. I'll be laughing all the way to the bank.
>And what will this prove? That women don't want to be with some good for nothing guy?
That this gentleman in the OP is good for nothing in the sordid eyes of femoids because he doesn't bring the beta bucks. In other words, the conclusion that most of the thread immediately came to.
>Wow, so much effort to prove a well known fact.
I agree. I don't know why OP is claiming otherwise.
I'm not saying THAT isn't fair. I'm saying that OP is failed to account for the prospect of beta providers.
>This is because to many women (and guys) that is boring. Taking care of family is cool, but what else does he do?
That's a big problem in dating.
Women are have incredibly high standards. This is all that should matter yet it ie boring, as if their carnal pleasures matter more than securing a future for their children. It's depraved.
>I'm a nerdy unattractive guy, so I should be fucked but I get pussy
t. Brad
sheltered sheeple detected
trust fund baby
>all arguments have failed
>resorts to reddit line spacing
Spoken like a true brain dead NPC
>The gold digger cliche applies to almost every woman, whether they care to admit it or not.
>source: my ass
>Incorrect. The burden of proof lies with you to prove that individuals with different chromosomes behave similarly.
Aside from some minor mental differences, there are little psychological differences between the genders. We have yet to documunt significant behavioral differences based on chromosomes, there is no reason to assume it's any different for dating.
>Real people incredibly one dimensional
Let me guess, that doesn't apply to you? People are more than what they seem on the surface. en.m.wikipedia.org
>Look around you, almost every normalfag above the age of 20 has had at least one girlfriend, and most of them aren't chads or rich.
>not aware that the word business can refer to any general company in any general field
>accuses me of being a brainlet
Projection, the post
>how I got my first job
Oh really? And who referred you to that job? And when you applied, did you have to interview? And when you interviewed, did you simply pass your resume to the interviewer and remain silent? Or did you mention strengths and weaknesses along with making some jokes and smiling from time to time?
But sure, let me just go ahead and believe your very anecdotal evidence and disregard the high probability that you are this poster assmad that hes been BTFOd
You were the first one to resort to namecalling. I have no counter arguments for yor post when it's devoid of any argument itsself. I'm pointing out hypocrisy. Which reminds me
>how dare you throw an empty insult at me you (empty insult)
Sorry bro, but we have to be honest with ourselves.
> (You)
>>how I got my first job
>Oh really? And who referred you to that job? And when you applied, did you have to interview? And when you interviewed, did you simply pass your resume to the interviewer and remain silent? Or did you mention strengths and weaknesses along with making some jokes and smiling from time to time?
>But sure, let me just go ahead and believe your very anecdotal evidence and disregard the high probability that you are this poster assmad that hes been BTFOd
Who referred me? I contacted a fucking contracting company that then contacts engineer firms on your behalf in order to get you a job. The contracting firm makes their money by skimming a little off of your paycheck for however long your contract is. When the contract is up, if you're good, the engineering firm that you worked for will hire you directly. If not, you go back to the recruiter and try and get with another company.
No shit, I had an interview -- engineering firms aren't going to hire someone based on a sheet of paper. I didn't bother with jokes, but, yes I smiled. You can smile, can't you?
If you're wondering about references, I used professors from college.
Now I bet you'll make up some shit about getting references to get into college. I started at a community college for two years -- they're all happy to take anyone in because they need the money. Do well there, then you can get into a better university to finish off your degree.
>there are too many things that I want to do.
Like what? Clearly having sex isn't one of them.
Learn another language.
Write music and get better at playing musical instruments.
Learn a new sport and exercise everyday.
Step up my meditation game; give astral travel a shot.
You should make him non-white
Also I feel like the "average" guy has a much shittier profile description.
>Aside from some minor mental differences, there are little psychological differences between the genders.
Oh, there are immense differences. That's why we behave so fundamentally different.
>there is no reason to assume it's any different for dating
The behavior of women in dating is our reason to assume it's different for dating.
>Let me guess, that doesn't apply to you?
It doesn't apply to me, because I behave radically different from many norms. I always have.
>People are more than what they seem on the surface.
No, they're really not. Your article is as innacurate as you are.
>Agnostic
Don't put in religious views man. That just lowers the pool. Maybe a nice religious girl would have liked Dmitri.
She's trying to get a greencard homie
You provide literally no soirces for any of your assertions. You're making these claims, but provide no evidence. I'm merely questioning your claims and a negative doesn' have to be proven.
All your believes are entirely based on your anecdotal experience, which is also heavily biased and hence not credible at all.
Nice going OP.
I can't wait to make a Chadfish account on Tinder for kicks, I just need to get a prepaid SIM card so I won't get it linked to my real account.
>You provide literally no soirces for any of your assertions.
I don't need to provide sources. As I already said, you have the burden of proof. Your sources are insufficient.
>I'm merely questioning your claims and a negative doesn' have to be proven.
A positive claim that the genders are the same does. You've provided peanuts so far.
>All your believes are entirely based on your anecdotal experience, which is also heavily biased and hence not credible at all.
My anecdotal experience has been the collective experiences of humanity as a whole. I'll trust trust that over your cucked bias any day.
>My anecdotal experience has been the collective experiences of humanity as a whole.
Yeah, as percieved by you.
Also, ockham's razor. My position requires less assumptions and is therefore the base Position, meaning it's the most rational position unless sufficient evidence to the contrary is presented.
Clarification.
I said no one should date anyone working at Walmart and I stand by it.
>Yeah, as percieved by you.
As percueved by everyone, since it's their collective experience.
>Also, ockham's razor.
Also, *a big nothing burger*
Ftfy
>My position requires less assumptions and is therefore the base Position,
Your position requires the assumption that men and women are equal mentally. That is objectively not the case. My position requires no assumptions.
>meaning it's the most rational position unless sufficient evidence to the contrary is presented.
That's exactly what I've been saying about my position, you fucking retard. With Occam's razor, your claim goes on it's ass out the window.
>As percueved by everyone, since it's their collective experience.
Oh really? You think most people would agree most women are greedy, loveless parasites? Sure.
>Also, *a big nothing burger*
That's funny, considering you use ockham's razor yourself later
>My position requires no assumptions.
>assuming women are fundamentally different from men in that regard specifically
>assuming nobody except for a small handfull of incels realize what would be so obvious
>assuming women only care about looks or wealth and only go for the prettiest and richest
>assuming almost every man besides you is attractive or rich, which is why only you specifically can't get a gf and the vast amount of normalfags can.
Your position requires conspiracy theory levels of assumptions
This thread has gone completely off the rails, but I would 100% date this hypothetical man. He seems wholesome.
Looks like those hips might be wide. More pics?
>Oh really? You think most people would agree most women are greedy, loveless parasites? Sure.
My position is not reliant on people thinking that they're greedy, loveless parasites. My position is reliant on whether they realize women behave differently than men.
>That's funny, considering you use ockham's razor yourself later
Correctly. You used it improperly. Thus, nothing burger.
>assuming women are fundamentally different from men in that regard specifically
That's not an assumption. Women are fundamentally different than men.
>assuming nobody except for a small handfull of incels realize what would be so obvious
Never assumed that.
>assuming women only care about looks or wealth and only go for the prettiest and richest
Women don't only care about looks or wealth, but they're innately drawn to those things, among others over more beneficial traits. This is not an assumption, but a pattern of behavior that the majority of women follow, whether they know it or not.
>assuming almost every man besides you is attractive or rich,
Relatively to CODanon, almost every man is attractive or rich. Relative to OP's nice boy, almost every man is more attractive.
He acts as if five matches are proof to the contrary but fails to account for wealth.
>which is why only you specifically can't get a gf
I specifically can get gf's have had gfs and currently am with a gf.
>Your position requires conspiracy theory levels of assumptions
It literally requires none.