Is vaping safe? Does it really damage your brain due to lowering O2 levels?

Is vaping safe? Does it really damage your brain due to lowering O2 levels?

youtube.com/watch?v=F8y3c_zwCPg

Attached: vape NPC.jpg (118x107, 6K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=qPdix_ab4YE
m.youtube.com/watch?v=2W9Eyr9sv1g
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4363846/
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

no, it doesnt. read any actual research article on the topic, use your brain, ect

You could have just posted super basedyan without asking an inane question. We probably would have judged you less

youtube.com/watch?v=qPdix_ab4YE

>Is vaping safe?
No, it's really not any safer than smoking cigarettes.

How the fuck is it supposed to lower O2 levels? Does it damage your lungs to th point it can't absorb o2 anymore? Do people vape longer than its posible to hold your breath?

Displaces oxygen.

How so? No known carcinogens, no CO, no tar. For sure it's ideal not to vape, but I don't see how it isn't better than smoking.

>No known carcinogens
{citation needed}
{from a credible source}

google popcorn lung

>May be a potential cause
Ok

lmao, the denial is strong. don't worry, im sure inahling copious amounts of vaporized nicotine and flavor chemicals has ZERO negative effects on your lungs. just keep puffing away.. heh heh...

I know about that. It's considered a possible cause with no reported cases. Sounds pretty safe compared to smoking to me.

You know what else has a non zero negative effect on your health? Sun exposure, eating red meat, eating fish, lifting heavy, cardio, sitting down in front of a pc, light exposure from electronics, WiFi, not having a gf, eating above maintenance, breathing. It's not about having a non zero effect, it's about balancing something's positive and negative effects, and enjoyment is a positive effect, even if we ignore the other positive effects nicotine has such as protecting you from certain illnesses.

You know what? You're right. I'm gonna go out and get some black tar heroin because I'm gonna enjoy the shit out of it. Who cares if it ruins my life lol

>Almost 2019
>Actually suggesting it's okay to vape on Jow Forums- Health and Fitness because you're a retard that can't function without his nicotine highs

If somehow you concluded that the benefit/negatives ratio of it is higher than other shit you can do right now, go for it.

>Almost 2019
>Still calling it 'health' and fitness

I bet you call this site 4channel, fag.

No, I call it 'The chan'.

>The chan
>not The Channel
It's nearly 2019 gramps, keep up

There's a 100% correlation between vaping and being an unbearable cunt.

Oh... it's one of THOSE retorts...
....wew.... XD super cringe owo

Attached: 1544998731999.png (310x453, 108K)

>implying the ingredient that was casing that is still used

Popcorn lung is caused by diacetyl, which is on average 500-750x more prevalent in cigarettes. Coming from a person that used vaping to quit smoking, that whole popcorn lung scare is bullshit pushed by the big tobacco companies to scare people.
If you are a non-smoker trying vaping you can buy tested juice that is certified to not contain any diacetyl, and in the U.K, diacetyl is banned in all vape juices.
Quit spreading misinformation about something you know nothing about dickhead.

m.youtube.com/watch?v=2W9Eyr9sv1g

Nicotine is considered a possible carcinogen, so on the same level as bananas.

Honestly if you ever want to hear a bunch of rationalizations from addicts, go to a vaping forum with this question

Vaping is a new thing. No one knows the long-term effects of something that hasn't been around for a long time. Yeah it's probably better than smoking but it's probably bad for you in its own way.

And no, you fucking addicts, nicotine is not as safe as drinking coffee:

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4363846/

What's an acceptable long-term study then? A RCT lasting 50 years? It's probably immoral to study anyway because it's potentially dangerous. Let's just ban vaping altogether to be sure until an acceptable long-term study comes in.

If anything we might finally get some long-term data isolating nicotine as much as possible.

Really I think the defense force is the same as weed advocates. It's a backlash because it's legally under fire and if they find any problem with it that only allows the government to regulate it harder. Meanwhile drinkers know alcohol is bad and are willing to admit the flaws and concede some ground because there's no chance in hell it'd be regulated as much as weed or vape.

Even if its "safe" you still look like a giant faggot. If i see you sucking on one of those retarded space dildos im smashing it out of your frail little retard hands.