Ok fit. lets test your faith in the "calories in calories out theory (myth)

ok fit. lets test your faith in the "calories in calories out theory (myth).
If i were to eat 1500 calories a day ONLY FROM SUGAR PACKETS would i still lose weight if i burned 2000 calories a day? discuss.

Attached: sugar.jpg (500x500, 14K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=vuIlsN32WaE
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Yes, but you'd feel like complete shit. You'd also get sick from lack protein and fats eventually.

Post body.

You’d probably lose extra weight due to muscle atrophy.

Check out "Sugar: The White Devil" on YouTube, OP.

so you admit im right.

yes

Yes but you won't get any nutrition so you'll feel super ill plus your muscles with deteriorate

Yes.
I wouldn't suggest doing that though, because sugar is nutritionally shit. A calorie is still a calorie no matter where it comes from, since it's a measure of potential energy and nothing more.
Thermodynamics dictates you cant conserve more energy than you put out. Energy doesn't magically appear out of thin air and stick to your body as fat.

You say "faith" like this isn't a highly testable and highly tested proposition. Every rigorous attempt to disprove CICO has failed. You can consult the literature on this. Once you control for everything in your experiments, differences in mass lost between isocaloric diets becomes consistent with 0.

If you DON'T think you'd lose weight on 1500 calories a day of sugar while burning 2000 calories, where would the energy come from to do the remaining amount of work? Thermodynamics would tell us that energy can't come from nothing- it's got to come from body mass

yes, but enjoy your diabetes and swift death

Yes, you would lose weight. A lot of that would be muscle too

CICO works after you met your daily protein/fat intake. The remaining calories, you "could" split it in whatever kind of macro you want.
Carbs will be available as glucose for energy.
Excess protein will be also available as glucose through gluconeogenesis, potentially more energy inefficient.
Excess fat, after depleting glycogen stores, would be available as ketones.

You'll feel as bad as vegans do (if not worse). You'll lose weight though.

You would lose weight and you'd look and feel like shit. This isn't rocket science my man

The problem with CICO is that retards stop at the first point. Yes CICO is technically true, but it’s so far from being that simple that it’s almost irrelevant.
For some retarded reason every just assumes that CO is a simple product of activity + static basal metabolic rate, which is not true. Basal rate changes a lot and it is directly affected by the nutritional content of what you eat. If 100% of your caloric intake comes from extremely high glycemic index carbohydrate and nothing else, that will wreak havoc on your body. Of course your body has to make up for the 500kcal deficit somehow and it will do so with a combination of metabolic restriction, protein catabolism and lipids. In the case you have proposed it would mostly be muscle and basal output that makes up the deficit.
You would also eventually die from lack of protein, cholesterol and vitamins.

Fatties trying to cope.

If you're trying to lose weight, cut the fucking sugar 100%. But muh cheat days!

Protein helps build muscle on bulks and helps retain muscle on cuts

this is science

therefore, eat more protein

the laws of thermodynamics are jewish bullshit

Ok sir what do you propose we eat

what would change if you would eat the same amount of sugar at different intervals, let's say in one sitting and in ten sittings, assuming you have eaten the same amount of sugar and done the same amount of physical activity, would you expend the same amount of calories?

balanced diet. 1g/lb body weight of protein, good sources of whole carbohydrates like vegetables, potatoes, sweet potatoes, oats

Good sources of fat like animal, olive

avoid highly processed foods that are made in factories and are unnatural for the body to consume. Simple as that

i just watched this

the truth is OP, we eat dont eat food, we eat sunshine

youtube.com/watch?v=vuIlsN32WaE

Attached: 1544565597085.jpg (750x933, 517K)

0.5g fat (no trans) per lb of bodyweight, ideally omega3.