User doesnt eat pork rinds

>user doesnt eat pork rinds
per 100g:
>61g protein
>11g saturated, 15g monounsaturated fats
>0g carbs
literally the most fit-tier snack in the world.
has triple the protein content of chicken breast and 2.5x the amount of beef.

Attached: 800px_COLOURBOX7781816.jpg (800x533, 84K)

While I agree rinds are pretty based, you need to know the protein is very low quality and does not contain a complete amino acid profile. Many packages even claim "not a good source of protein " on the side. Still crispy and delicious though

I'm sorry to tell you this, but the "protein" in this is incomplete. Google it. It would have been truly the absolute best food but it is not. On top of that, i think the cooking process creates a lot of harmful substances.
i still eat them though, zero carbs, salty and not that fat. absolutely godly keto snack.

Wouldn't make it a stable in my diet however

Tastes disgusting. Has hair in it. Good protein content, but shit protein. You could eat gelatin and get the same result.

same fag

yeah you have to make them yourself. Kinda defeats the purpose of eating meat if its fried in a big bowl of soi.
Nothing like the cracklings you get from a big batch of making lard.

you can fry it in lard or beef tallow

Based paranoid schizo retard

Attached: buh.jpg (87x36, 1K)

I wish I could buy beef rinds.

its protein contains 5.4% leucine, compared to 7.8% in ground beef, so it's not that bad. also, it contains 19.4% glycine compared to 6.8% in ground beef. glycine balances methionine (found in most protein sources), and is very healthy. together with the other collagen aminos in pork rinds, it's great for healing tendons and ligaments too.

are US pork rinds not fried in lard?

danish pork rinds arent fried in soi you dunce, only los americas fry their things in soioil