Fit statues and paintings dump general for motivation. Greco-roman preferred.
Realism nerds not welcome.
Fit statues and paintings dump general for motivation. Greco-roman preferred
How is this stuff not realism? Shit looks legit.
i really hope my back will look like that in a few years.
You should not use Greek and Roman statues as your guide, they depict impossible proportions
Doryphoros. The ideal man. Every sculpting student in ancient greece and rome had to get this particular statue right if they ever wanted a career in sculpting.
Mediocre physique
this isn't the thread for you roidhead, take your shrunken testicles and body dysmorphia back to /fraud/
I don't take steroids and I'm more buff than he was.
I may not have the physique these statues have but at least my dick is bigger.
I'd take the tradeoff.
This is realistic/detailed, but realism refers to emulating real life instead of idealizing it. So a realist statue would have fat pockets or other flaws you'd expect in a real person
The Rape of Proserpina by Bernini is my favourite.
And this part of it is the reason.
Here's a classic. If only I could be as beautiful...
How in the hell can marble look so soft?
Here's another one, The Veiled Virgin by Bernini. The man was a god.
One thing to note on the David, his upper half is bigger than usual because it was meant for the viewer to be near him and look up so the foreshorterning would have made his upper portion look proportionate to the lower half which was closer to the viewer.
Damn, I wish I could see him live. I guess I'll have to add Firenze to my list of places to travel.
If you ever have the misfortune of being in southern California, I highly recommend the Getty center and Getty Villa. They both have loads of Greco-Roman art and the Villa itself is heavily inspired by an ancient Roman Villa.
post body
I've seen it in person, can confirm it looks 100% real.
That one's actually 19th century, not Bernini. But those statues with the veiled illusion are amazing.
Whenever I see this I worry that Heracles will get Saturday night palsy from leaning on that club for too long like that
Back has made up muscles
Fuck, I'm retarded. You're right.
>paintings
Frazetta ftw
still my favorite sculpture
based and redpilled
lol, literally skinnyfat
I've always wondered, these statues must have been modelled on the looks of actual people. How did people in those days know about proper eating calories/macros etc as well as proper workout routines
Oh?
>that guy works on the field lifting heavy shit and he's strong and ripped but the jew boy sitting in his shop all day selling pottery is weak and flabby
>this guy eats a lot of meat and is bigger and stronger than this other one who only eats fruits
it's not quantum physics bro, people back then weren't completely retarded you know,
oh yes
amazing v line on neck and good nose
Roman statues tend to be compounds of multiple bodies.
like they got a guy with big arms to pose for the arms and a guy a ripped chest to pose for the chest.
You know the rules. Post body.
i think that back is supra-real
Don't worry they are realistic
> emulating real life instead of idealizing it.
That's exacly what the did, exercising was a civil duty
> So a realist statue would have fat pockets or other flaws you'd expect in a real person
Im guessing you're american if you think a common person is a fatty fuck (which is true for the USA)
seriously about to end nofap day 2 to a fucking statue
ahem
HNNNNNNNGGGGG
Natty limit without our knowledge, i believe we can go further as natty
Nice cope. Their statues are so anatomically precise that most art historians believe they were using live models as a reference. Dudes really were getting that stacked back in 600 BC.
Yes, those fat pockets are "realistic" in the modern world where people work sedentary jobs and have been eating food spiked with corn syrup for most of their lives. Back then you walked almost everywhere, labored physically, ate only whole foods, and on top of all that the ancient greeks did have gymnasiums and understood that more physical training meant more muscle and strength.
and these guys basically did nothing but rich piana feeder workouts. srs
Bernini's David is the superior David.
pic related has love handles
Cut guys get skin folds like that when they lean over dude.
Clearly you have never sat down shirtless or done any heavy movements
I always liked this guy a lot
Torso Belvedere is T H I C C
my goal physique
Also, I know well of the "small dick = good" view of the ancient med world, so does that mean there are barbarian statues (usually of them dying or losing, but still) with large dicks?
desu it's sad to say no one looks like this now because everyones a sugar chasing mongrel
It's more about not drawing the attention to the penis. The piece is not meant to be pornographic. The only reason there is a penis is to keep it anatomically correct. If all of these statues had 10 inch dicks, everyone's eyes would be looking at them and not the artistic parts.
pic related is a depiction of a barbarian, dick is ok. But that is only a secondary reason imo, makes more practical sense.
Holy shit that back is aesthetic.
Actually it’s his head and hands that are enlarged and it’s because it was meant to be placed on a cathedral roof
There's one of those five minutes from where I live. I always mire it whenever I go for walks
Another but from the back
Also here's one that's two minutes from the Hercules, of the Goddess of the river, Sabrina of the Severn, that you see behind Hercules in that pic
actually, this topic is a little more nuanced than you think; a lot of these statues were idealized depictions of godlike figures - many greek and roman sculptors had good knowledge of human anatomy extrapolate this
however, you are correct, the greek were very big into athleticism so I am sure there were no shortage of good looking people; but remember, this is way back then when the average age was like 25 and you probably were not fed that well to make these bodies the norm
i'm not an art historian but definitely look around, it also depends on the statue as well
Yeah!
look how short that nigga is lmao
Yeah!
Yeah!
Yeeeeee-Haw!
lol post body
>post bod
Currently my phone lock screen
Proof Roman's was black
Checkmate raycist ass white boy.
I'm surprised nobody posted this one yet. Most of the statues of the Renaissance and the Neoclassical period are inspired by it.
yes u r buff but you look mediocre
Shut it, fatties.
post body
its the genetics. those guys would be the strength sports record holders if they lived in the modern era with modern training and nutrition
2
3
Small dick doesn't mean "good" necessarily. Small dicks were patrician as fuck. Big dicks were thought to be grotesque and take away from the beauty of the rest of the statue. The only reason you'd put a big dick on a statue is if you were a degenerate, tasteless pleb.
4
There’s literally back muscles that dont exist on the sculpture
>Their statues are so anatomically precise that most art historians believe they were using live models as a reference
That's bull lol. Many of these sculptors had exhumed bodies and studied muscle anatomy. No one was this big in those days. These statues are often portraying Gods, Demi-Gods or war heroes, so their physique is exaggerated to show how powerful they were.
Is it just my body dysmorphia or does he look like a twink
David is literally underaged.