Incel logic

>can't find a single woman who will fuck them
>solution is to have women fuck less often
what causes this line of thinking? is it american education? vaccinations?

Attached: 656767457454.png (428x335, 238K)

Complete, utter, unending retardation.

It's the same logic the liberals have.

"I can't have/don't like this thing so no one can."

Fear of women or complete misunderstanding of them could yield similar results.
I wonder if faggots find incels just as off-putting. We need volunteers.

The solution is to force women to fuck me.

women are vapid shallow animals
the answer is ending all women's rights

Attached: blackpill+101+looks+personality+okcupid.png (1000x696, 121K)

Literally no incel has ever said that shit

There is some kind of mass confusion when it comes to Normies attempting to understand Incels. They all seem to think that all Incels want to have sex...which is largely untrue.

It's not fucking less often, it's staying with one partner.

Women fucking less often means each fuck is more valuable. This is pretty obvious stuff.

It states people, not women.

>Women fucking less often means each fuck is more valuable
oh, i see. so with each fuck being more valuable, wouldn't that make it even less likely for women to fuck losers? why waste such a valuable thing on some b3tab0y

But you're not an involuntary celibate if you're making a concious voluntary choice to not have sex

THE ARGUMENT IS: Female sexual freedom only gives chad sex stop trying to straw man

Exactly. That's why they hate it.

Incorrect, the use of 'incel' has, like most things, adapted to fit a larger band of males. Now it is more of a blanket term.

I'm just speaking for what it means but yeah I understand.

Do you basically just mean beta males then?

Nah, the main Incel site is very hostile to people that have regular sex or display normie behaviours. The term on that site also covers people that simply hate women and society and do not wish to have sex. I suppose in a way they're involuntary due to a mental attitude.

Gee this seems like a completely natural thread made by real random users.

The real misunderstanding is that Jow Forums has anything to do with cringe lord plebbitors. Another misunderstanding is that incels just want casual sex and could easily get it.

Becuase you dumb nigger it means that only one woman gets chad and the others have to pair off with betas.

Is the concept of marriage really that foreign to degenerates like you?

>implying a woman would settle for an incel before just going lesbian
thanks for the kek young man. hope you work up enough courage to look a woman in the eye one day

>mfw incels think they'd be fit to raise children

Attached: 634643643634.png (879x565, 1.07M)

Exactly. If I was more slutty I'd gladly bang a few robots but since I'm saving myself for someone who is worth it, I'll never waste my purity on a loser who lives at home and hates women.

It's like having a car. There are so many cars you're gonna get the best car you can afford. If cars were scarce, however, you wouldnt mind driving a piece of shit. After all, it still does the job.

I don't dislike this kind of poster, in fact it's well crafted bait and there's merit to it.
However I strongly despise anyone thinking of replying to it seriously and urge you to leave the board or at least lurk moar.

>solution is to have women fuck less often
No the solution is to be LOYAL. The way our culture is heading girls only fuck chad or they stay single until Chad is done fucking another girl and become available.

>After all, it still does the job.
does it though? the prospect of fucking one of the most undesirable men on the planet for the rest of your life sounds like hell. if anything these women would turn to harems