It's C right?

Kill them all and shove the individual flute pieces up their dead asses

the male should get the flute and the girls should sing

lmao this is r9k thats been gone lol

>a and b are female and c is male
Hmmm really doodles the kaboodle.

In theory B should get it, because they produced it. However if they produced it as part of a job at a factory, it was never really theirs, or if they produced it and sold it, it stopped being theirs. Property belongs to whoever owns it. You own something by either making it or buying it from someone else who made it. It's not up to you or me who deserves to own what.

*sigh* every fucking time. Now it's time for me to post this image a gain. Fuck all you faggots, you deserve to die painful deaths.

Attached: 1539285510096-r9k.jpg (354x462, 19K)

They're not fighting over "a" flute, they're fighting over B:s flute.

The question is trying to bias you into thinking it's a neutral situation but it's not.

B made it. It's theirs. The other two children are freeloading jellies.

It doesnt matter
the powerful get to decide on the narrative of justice regardless if it's actually just or not
theories of justice dont compete on how truthful or logical they are but on the sum of the power their subscribers hold
the rest fade into obscurity

It's still hers you retard

The point is that B deserves it, not because she made it or some shit, no, that's a beta ass pussy answer. She deserves the flute because I'll fuck her with it.

Attached: 1542234755925-r9k.jpg (784x960, 35K)

>stupid comic made by some right wing retarded that resemble a choice but in the end just shit on poor people with rethorics

No thanks, I'm not that autistic

Attached: FB_IMG_1550818447456.jpg (960x648, 46K)

>retards unironically think B is supposed to be the capitalist

>Fascist
A
>Communist
B, C if he goes to a gulag
>Capitalist
Sold to A, Wageslaved by B, C starves under an overpass, all profits go to me

B without nuance, but ultimately A.
B should be compensated fairly for the loss of their flute, but because B is unable to make use of the property it should be distributed to the person who will generate the greatest net benefit to humanity by using it. If B simply keeps it in a display case as a "I built this, I'm proud of it" then it is wasted. Obviously a flute is an insignificant thing in the grand scheme of the world but as an allegory for philosophy the flute belongs in the hands of A, with B being encouraged to create more flutes and being rewarded for doing so.

>Pic Related

Fake video.

l'd sell it to the highest bidder.

Fuck your socialism. A and C need to figure shit out on their own.

There's a reason why both A and C are red.

B keeps the flute, and can provide it to A in exchange for something of similar value. C can fuck off.

i take the flute and shove it up OPs' faggot ass

Stick the flute in your pussy

Attached: 1438349498814.jpg (2600x1728, 691K)

Careful with that edge, sport.

C can suck the flute out of B's pussy

The answer is B. They mixed their labour with the flute to create it, and therefore have the greatest claim to ownership. Any other arguments need not apply.

Trick question. The answer is "the black man". He'll take it whether you like it or not. Better just give it to him so you don't get beaten worse.

Attached: 1526970610828.webm (540x266, 1.86M)

C is a retard

"I don't know how to play flute but gibe free I'll be happy ;(("

A can pay

That's technically a child, as established in the OP. You're off to jail, user.

>Thinking this image is an adequate metaphor for anything

Attached: grayons.png (540x536, 194K)

From a capitalist perspective, it should go to B, because she provided the materials (capital) for it.
From a communist perspective, it should go to B, because she provided the labor for it.
From a religious perspective, God commands you not to steal, and the flute belongs to B.

B is the only correct answer.

What little net benefit to humanity you have created is greatly overshadowed by the decay of moral standards which you have not only permitted, but actively encouraged. Whether B sells her flute to A is not your choice to make, and you are a fool if you think taking away her agency with regards to her own property will in any way encourage her to make more flutes. You will indeed have the opposite effect, crushing her spirit by establishing firmly within her mind that she does not have a right own things. Anything she makes can be taken away from her, and there's nothing she can do about it.

Is it worth child A having a flute if you have sewn distrust and disillusionment in child B? Morals matter.

Ashcroft v Free Speech Coalition. He's not off to jail unless he lives in some shithole country without freedom, like Canada or the UK.

Child B. It's her's.

>Ashcroft v Free Speech Coalition
This will not hold up in any state court lmao. Have fun getting butt fucked by men in prison for distributing child porn.

If B made it and provided the materials then it's hers, A & C are just trying to steal it from her for selfish reasons.

this really fucking oversimplifies economics because it assumes that impoverished people can't gain the skills necessary to be productive. they're disadvantaged in their lot in life and don't have the same tools as B (which is obviously natural resources) and A (which is obviously formal training/educational access). If C was to gain any of those things then it would be on better or at least equal grounds to receive the flute

>A has a point because she has the skills to use it.
>B has a point because she put in the work required to produce it. However if she has the expertise to make a flute that works, she most likely knows how to play it too.
>C is trying to guilt trip us in order to obtain free handouts. He also doesn't know how to play the flute.
The answer is B.

According to property rights, the flute belongs to B because she made it and has not yet decided who she will sell it to. If she does sell it, she is going to earn more money by selling it to A, and also enabling more output to be produced further down the line. If C could actually play flute, he should be considered. C doesn't deserve it by virtue of not having anything. He can't even play it. Supposing he could, he would need to be the highest bidder, which is not possible due to his economic condition. Also, C sounds very entitled for a poor person. B's wisest decision would be to keep the flute OR sell it to A.

C is useless anyway, so by helping him getting a purpose, you make sure all three people are not stuck in a loop where they cannot become any more useful.
It makes sense because on the long term A and B will gain something through C not being human trash
It is fair if and only if the flute would have been given to A or B if she was the useless one

>who would YOU give it to
So I have taken it from them all? Then I am the mightiest and everything they have or make belongs to me. I take the flute as tax/tribute.