Just count calories bro!

>just count calories bro!
>calories in, calories out, so fucking easy bro

16 oz boneless skinless chicken breast

>National Chicken Council - 754 kcal
>Nutrionix - 748 kcal
>Livestrong - 684 kcal
>Myfooddiary - 587 kcal
>fatsecret - 496 kcal
>Calorie King - 480 kcal
>Myfitnesspal - 472 kcal
>eatthismuch - 440 kcal

Defend this CICOtards

Attached: annoyedpepe.jpg (250x241, 7K)

Other urls found in this thread:

m.youtube.com/watch?v=A4s0quoRv3M
health.harvard.edu/diet-and-weight-loss/eating-frequency-and-weight-loss
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

notice there s a difference between 16oz of cooked vs raw meat, brainlet

Little issue here you fucking retard, there is 8 different numbers, not 2

>just count calories
>ate 4000 cals a day and was able to count it consistenty
>still gained a lot of weight

fucking retards, it doesnt work

Attached: ungabunga.jpg (800x450, 41K)

You got me there OP, might as well eat three large pizzas a day because of relatively minor discrepancies

If you're too retarded for CICO you can always do IF.

>Count calories by whatever the highest kcal amount is listed
>Literally never ever have a fucking problem with going over your limit because you're already following a 'worst case scenario' type approach

>highest estimate nearly double the amount of lowest
>minor discrepancy

> estimates are estimated OH NOOOOO
Retard just track your shit using the same estimator and adjust intake based on weight changes

it's estimating how much weight is lost when cooking.
you're ngmi if you're this autistic about food anyways.

That's not how it works dumbass. It isn't just "myfitnesspal is blanket 10% higher calories across the board so I'll adjust accordingly." Different items are lower or higher and you also can't have exact recording of exact portion size and details of everything you ate.

The only purpose of CICO is for fat fuck idiots to go "woah no way, that 40 oz sugary soda that doesn't fill me up in any way and tastes the same as diet was a quarter my calories!"

Call it 600 and shut your fat mouth before you speak to me

>ketard
should've known

literally every chicken I ever bought that had nutritonal values on the package had between 1-2g of fat and 22-24.5g of protein per 100g, what the fuck

literally counting calories is retarded. Congratulations on figuring that out.

When bulking, just aim for a gain of a half pound per week and when cutting, cut 2 pounds per week.

The scale tells you everything you need to know about your balance of CICO, without estimating (wildly inaccurately) the actual number

Food is incredibly inconsistent. Are you stupid or something?

Are you some retard ngmi who tries to fit as much possible food into his daily allotment or something? Don't check 50 different sites to see what they all say. Stupid stupid loser

Unless it's in the 1000s who cares if it's a couple if hundred off? If you're not eating at least 800cals under your target amount to lose weight it'll take you years.

Eating at a slight deficit is for women and pussies, be a tough guy for once and quit bitching about having to do simple grade school math

Weigh your raw chicken before and after cooking and divide the cooked amount by the raw amount and keep that number. When you weigh your chicken just multiply it by that number and put it in myfitnesspal. You can even scan the barcode on the package if you want to be exact but raw chicken breast is pretty consistent.

>Defend this CICOtards

Read the nutrition label on the actual fucking package.

Also, you weight it raw when you buy it raw. When you buy it cooked, you weigh it cooked.

I eat about 200g of chicken every night, it's no more than 200 calories.

On the fucking label, it says: 112g is 110 cal and 26g protein.

Round up when cutting,
Round down when bulking.

That's why fasting is superior to any CICO shit

m.youtube.com/watch?v=A4s0quoRv3M

Now stop eating piggy, oink oink

>so fucking easy bro

You're right. It is. You're just retarded is all. Assume the worst on that retarded list you posted and count the highest value since you're too god damn stupid to tell the difference between raw, cooked, skinned, skinless, and cooked in shit chicken breast.

I've legitimatley lost almost 50 lbs over the past 4 months doing just cico. Eat shit fag.

Attached: 1552757170925.png (743x539, 188K)

Just use MyFitnessPal anf fuck off you retarded lardass

I use MyFitnessPal and always get my chicken from one source: Costco. Always stays the same. I do this with all my food when cutting. Also I count macros. Those are pretty consistent. If you can’t be strict like that then what’s the point. Don’t be an idiot.

average them and go by that you turbonigger

Actually these are skinless, boneless chicken breast grilled or baked

You're just a fat fuck retard who thought it was a stunning revelation to discover that guzzling a half gallon of soda and 2 big macs and a large fry at every meal is a lot of calories and maybe you should adjust your diet to lose weight

For those of us who aren't fat pieces of shit new to dieting, CICO offers no value

>not doing both

wtf i hate cico now?

these guys have it. also don't just google "16 oz boneless skinless chicken breast" - look up the brand such as kirkland or perdue or tysons or whatever.
essentially searching for (insert brand name) skinless chicken breast or (insert brand name) for any food on ur calorie counting app is the easiest way to decrease the variability in the nutrition thats recorded

>3.5 oz raw = 114 calories
>114/3.5 = 32.57 kcal/oz
>16 oz x 32.57 = 521 kcal
Well OP, we can start our explanation with the fact of your faggotry. You used the cooked value on accident. I'm gonna go ahead and assume your math is fucked for all the rest too.

Attached: Screenshot_20190629-235523_Chrome.jpg (1080x1848, 675K)

>makes thread bitching about cico
>"WELL C-CICO DOESN'T EVEN MATTER IT'S POINTLESS WHEN YOU'RE NOT A FAT FUCK"

Why bitch about something that's apparentley useless to you then?

Attached: 1438588002162.gif (500x333, 133K)

>be a fat ugly fuck
>base entire video off an unfounded broscience claim
>instead of trying to expand on or substantiate this claim in any way you spent only five seconds covering, instead spend 10 minutes just screaming and repeating the same things based off that unsubstantiated claim
Fuck off retard

health.harvard.edu/diet-and-weight-loss/eating-frequency-and-weight-loss

You mad well cork?

Just use the numbers stated on the actual packaging.