Is there any reason why lifting with one limb alone is much harder than lifting with both limbs?
Is there any reason why lifting with one limb alone is much harder than lifting with both limbs?
>is two arms stronger than one arms?
Gee I dunno OP why don't you stop being a massive faggot?
Can you ride a bicycle? Now how about a unicycle? Balance and stability frendo
I want a scientific explanation dumbass.
1+1=2
2 > 1
I believe OP means why is it more like 1+1=3 rather than the individual strength of both arms, ie why can you curl a 40 in each arm, but 100 total together on a barbell (ignoring ROM benefits).
Why do you need a scientific explaination for common sense?
I want an anatomical explanation of why a single arm is harder than both arms.
combined core working together makes the invisible 3rd
I want an anatomical explanation of how you're still breathing.
Using 2 arms recruits more muscles from the rest of your body, dumb fuck. That’s how the central nervous system works. The body evolved to work as a cohesive unit
does working your stabilizers mean the exercise is much harder?
gee i don't know
what he means is why would a 100 squat on 1 leg be harder than a 200 squat using both legs
Means it's easier, and your stabilizers get actual work because you're not falling for the isolation workout meme
...
How is the rest of my body recruited in something like a bicep curl. My arm is moving the weight, not my core.
When you feed your body the right exercises the seeds of work you plant allow you to Chuck all kinds of weight around
Wow, okay. How is this related to the question?
(formerly statement)
just say the line