Red meat increases probability of cancer by 18%

>Red meat increases probability of cancer by 18%
>Fruit juice increases it by 50%

What now, vegans?

telegraph.co.uk/science/2019/07/10/two-glasses-fruit-juice-day-may-boost-cancer-risk-50-per-cent/

Attached: dogsog.jpg (184x184, 4K)

define fruit juice

the juice of fruit

Attached: 1561173161249.jpg (570x600, 65K)

I'm not reading any UK links, so are they claiming it's the sugar, the pesticides or something else?

correlation =/= causation

>Fruity jews cause disease

Redpilled af

Fat around the abdomen, caused by high sugar %

Cum

Not even.
What the study is referring to is specifically "fruit juice", I.E. that garbage loaded with as much added/artificial sugar as a coke.
Who the fuck even drinks this stuff except infants with shit-for-brains parents? This shit has long since been known to be a bait-and-switch.
OVERLOAD OF SUGAR IS BAD
PLEASE CLICK OUR LINK
Telegraph and all articles like this are just as bad as the kikeshit they're reporting on.

Given the fact that "fruit juice" is literally just water, HFCS, then like 1-2% actual juice, I'm going to go with sugar. But even 100% shit can't be good for you. Like you'd need to juice like 10 apples to get a glass of juice, but get none of the fiber/satiation, so you're still basically drinking the water/HFCS abomination with a bit more added nutrition.

>>Red meat increases probability of cancer by 18%

What does this mean?
Let's say the lifetime risk for cancer is 25%, then would an 18% increase be 28% (25 x 1.18) or is it 43% (25 + 18)?

Because if it is the first, an 18% increase is not that bad. and i will continue to eat red meat.

It's the first.

They are trying to sound as spooky as possible. Soon they will start adding 100% to everything to scare brainlets even more.
118% PROBABILITY OF CANCER. STOP EATING RED MEAT AND TRY OUR SOI JUICE TODAY.

Cool, because going from 25% to 28% is not too bad. But 25% to 43% is cigarette smoking tier.

Cigarette tier is actually magnitudes larger. Like thousands of percent more than a non smoker - at least for lunge cancer. That's why they call cigarettes definitive carcinogens, but call processed meat - yeah, not even "red", but like deli meats and hot dogs - "kinda maybe carcinogens". It's within statistical error/not fully statistically significant.

>lunge cancer
>lunge
God damn I'm dumb

we still out here?

Attached: 1540709684792.jpg (730x666, 93K)

based

it's sugar

i don't think anyone ever claimed fruit juice was healthy

Based /scv/ bros

Correlation =! Causation
This is something that Jow Forums broscientists and reporters alike don't seem to understand

>Red meat increases probability of cancer by 18%

It doesn't. 18% is a statistical "nothing." Other factors such as "the meat eaters in the survey included bloated fast-food addicts" mean this so-called science, is a joke.

They should study why 88% of vegans get sick as fuck, and quit, but (((they))) will never make, or even allow that study.

Attached: 1562299051867.jpg (1280x720, 238K)

No, COOKED red meat gives you a higher risk of cancer. In fact cooked anything will because of the carcinogens.

It's not that they don't understand it, but that fake news is a real thing because sensationalist headlines get more clicks.

sup Anis

Attached: 1547083058316.png (534x627, 154K)

hehe