Was Micheal Jackson a pedophile?
Micheal Jackson was the ultimate robot.
A person that normies don't understand.
Normies think sex is the end all be all.
Micheal Jackson was stunted mentally from abuse during growing up.
MJ wasn't a pedophile.
He had peter pan syndrome.
Like A LOT of robots.
He was mentally stuck as a child.
Normies don't understand that.
That's what a robot is.
Normies live "normal" lives and experience and grow from their mistakes and living as a child.
But if you don't have any of those experiences?
Then what?
What if you were bullied as a child?
What if you felt you didn't fit in?
What if you were a shut-in and kept to yourself?
MJ was only seen as a pedophile to normies.
The same normies that call a single father, taking their kids to a park, a pedophile creep.
Was Micheal Jackson a pedophile?
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikipedia.org
youtube.com
twitter.com
You're right. We just be dem lost boys.
Except I'm actually a pedo as well
>spoiler
well, deus vult faggot.
Age of consent should really be abolished anyway. It is authoritarian and only an idiot would support it.
en.wikipedia.org
He was probably also a pedophile. Whether he actually sexually assaulted kids is another question and one I don't have the answer too, but he certainly had the opportunity.
being a retard doesn't make you a robot, it makes you a retard
try again
Go back to your Jow Forums cesspool, roastie whires instituted severe age of consent laws because they cant hope to compete with young women
>Jow Forums for wanting to kill a pedophile
>defending Micheal Jackson
lol ok Reddit
Uh, no. Below a certain age threshold you don't even know what you're consenting to. Coercing someone into agreeing to something they don't understand by exerting authority over them is pretty fucked up and damaging. If you had an eight year old daughter would you be okay with a fat, balding 43 year old man fucking her in the room next to yours?
>that example
Pretty extreme desu. How about my 14 year old daughter being paired off with a reputable young man of 21?
I would never have a daughter so the point is moot anyways. Your outlook is very primitive and barbaric and great men like Foucault sought to lead us to a better future. Anti-pedophile laws are really just a "trap" at the end used to pursue people over arbitrary things like age.
Mahatma Gandhi used to sleep naked with underage girls
I'm not him but at around 10 years I knew who and what I was. In fact, I used that to my advantage plenty of times. Was I being taken advantage of when I ate my 15yr old neighbor's pussy? And she sucked my 10yr old dick? This was in the 90s, before the Internet made everyone into degenerates.
Why the FUCK is this relevant again? That's all shit I heard already 14 years ago
The fucker is dead I don't give a shit if he fucking raped puppies or not
Of course it's extreme, in matters of the law you have to ask yourself if you're prepared to accept the most extreme circumstances that the law allows for, since it's inevitably going to come to pass. I sure as hell would want my daughter to wait until she understood what she was doing.
You were both underage, you can't prosecute minors for sexual conduct in most countries unless you are molesting babies or something.
>Supporting age of consent laws is primitive and barbaric
Yeah, okay then, Wannabe child molester.
So, what you're saying is the law is what prevents you from being a degenerate? Similar to a religious person? Interesting. That's even worse desu.
I'm sure you're aware that "the law" varies by region. What that faggot said about his hypothetical 14 year old daughter is legal in plenty of countries.
Hmm? A kiddo in America with a naked selfie of themselves, or a peer, on their phone can be prosecuted for having child pornography.
I hope one day you get arrested for breaking an age of consent law and you realize how extremely arbitrary it all is.
some people are looking for press clippings. I don't even give a fuck, the man made some fantastic songs. Roman Polanski literally raped a 12 year old girl, that doesn't mean Chinatown wasn't a fantastic film
No that isn't what I'm saying, you just made that up. Nowhere did I say that I'm pro child molestation, I said the exact opposite of that. I do not want the most extreme circumstances removing the law would allow for and am therefore in favour of age of consent laws. I don't think any first or second world country allows for pedophilia.
If you're in favor of age of consent laws, then you're a pedophile. You an legally fuck a 13 year old in Japan. You can fuck a 14 year old in Mexico.The law says so. It's legal. It's not statutory rape.
I don't think any 15 year old high school girls are going to be having sex with me any time soon, think I'm good on that front.
Child pornography laws are a different beast from age of consent laws. They exist primarily to protect children from exploitation, but it can sometimes backfire and wind up destroying another child's life. But at the same time, what do you do about that? From a legal standpoint it's a very difficult situation to approach. If you legalize it, you open a Pandora's box of loopholes that will inevitably be used to exploit minors. If you don't, you accept that a certain percentage of people are going to be punished for engaging in fairly normal, if ill advised behavior.
Do you know what strawmanning and gaslighting is? You're doing it right now. I wouldn't fuck a 13 year old even if it was legal, because it violates my views on what are of consent should be.
I agree child pornography laws are draconian. But, what can you do? It's the law. No one is talking about legalizing anything. Should a 16 year old that took a naked picture of themselves be charged for having child pornography? Because that's exactly what's happening.
Why the fuck am I talking about this shit. It makes me extremely uncomfortable. You sound like that faggot that's stalking me. I see you faggot.
Bye. You're still a pedophile. No semantics can help you. You will die. You will suffer. You will be burned alive.
I'm not a pedophile, literally nothing I've said in this thread has been pro-pedophile. I'm just lamenting the unfortunate-ness of children getting in trouble for having nude pictures of themselves or people they're in to and the complexity of the laws that cause it.
but why the fuck are normalfags talking about this NOW? This is the same regurgitated stories that I already knew about when I was literally 10 years old
and his music is really lame btw