Thinking about stealing = thief

thinking about stealing = thief
thinking about murdering = murderer
thinking about raping = rapist
thinking about men = homosexual
thinking about kids = pedophile
thinking about eating people = cannibal
thinking about fucking the dead = necrophile

discuss

Attached: 5dc9720eb25c704f09e.jpg (736x1179, 107K)

Other urls found in this thread:

discord
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

I thought about being the president once but I'm not in the fucking oval office, now am I.

that's retarded logic

I get this train of thought, but I think acting out on an action is much worse, as it produces concrete actions that cause effects for others rather than just something that only effects an individual in their mind.

my pee pee bigger than all of yours

so you're saying those "glimpses from the void" you get where you imagine yourself doing crazy shit means you actually did it? get real lol

Oh yes "the others". Can't believe I forgot about them and not the individuals in question
Yes. Fuck the one for the many. And as you rape the individual and their bodies pile up as if a mountain
You shall see, that there is no such thing as One or Others, but we are all 'They'

>Think about being being knotted by dog
Based and dogpilled

Attached: loliconhentai-lolibeastiality-astrid-howtotrainyourdragon-cartoonporn.jpg (1750x2304, 395K)

Well I thought of having a girlfriend many times but I'm still here

I'm saying I support sociologists in their efforts to redefine the world
You think of killing others?!! You murderer!
You think of eating others!!!?? You cannibal!

A bunch of Bernard Marx round here in this Brave New World talking that newspeak

talking bout that New Language

Can you tell us, all mighty baitposter, how do you rationalize such a radical stance?

Attached: bait.png (512x512, 8K)

It has to be like this across the board!
You can't say some people are [this label] but others are defined by the action itself only

Thinking about those and not doing it = strong and free will

Depends on how many times you think about each individual thing but other then that this just seems like basic thought process. I don't really see what there is to discuss here. It's just like saying when there's no rain you won't get wet when you walk outside.

I agree. You can't be labeled something you do not do

I fully agree, thought crime should be punished by public execution.

Attached: 1548785301874.jpg (575x1102, 304K)

test
123235qw45

thinking about the holocaust = no holocaust

Attached: 1554493344226.jpg (499x550, 30K)

Haha my pee pee smol and my is locked up

I mean, if you fantasize about fucking men and are a man, you are most definitely at least bisexual if not homosexual, yea. Same with necrophilia and pedophilia. Some of these actions (stealing) and some of them are sexual attractions. A homosexual virgin is still homosexual.

Attached: 1346484437082.jpg (387x420, 48K)

I judge everyone by their actions, its just that I expect some people to act in certain ways. I expect groups of people to act different because I've seen them act like that my whole life, pattern recognition, as simple as that.

>thinking about having sex = not virgin
flawless logic you retard

Its exactly my point. this is dumb logic but its already being applied for some of them today
(pedophilia, necrophilia, homophilia)

If thinking about children makes you a pedo are all parents pedos?

>having a baby INSIDE your vagina
You tell me if that's not pedo, hell they're not even a day old at that point the sick freaks

I wouldn't want my thoughts to be prohibited.

discord
X]I-IX]37[XI-I[X
.gg/vvftDyy

Attached: ahegao 17.jpg (373x287, 40K)

That Hotaru is very off-model and therefore offputting and unsexy.

>lel ppl r just born that way
No.
Homosexuals are men who fuck men.
Virgins are virgins.

Man a lot of people in this thread are brainlets and missing op's point completely. His point is that just because you think about stealing it doesn't make you a thief, and just because you think about kids it doesn't make you a pedophile.

Of course, this misses the definition of pedo, necrophile, etc which is the attraction towards things rather than a direct action, but taking OP's point in good faith I suppose what he intends to mean is that just because you think about fucking a corpse doesn't mean you will do it and there's no moral ground in criticizing it unless they do it, similar to how there's little moral ground in criticizing someone who's thinking about murdering someone unless they do it.

>thinking about men = homosexual
>thinking about kids = pedophile
>thinking about fucking the dead = necrophile
These three are true because they are defined by thought not action.