Under clown world capitalism...

Under clown world capitalism, there are teams of people who are literally working 40 hour weeks to produce something like this.

Attached: dragon-dildo-hankeys-toys-silicone-d3357-12.jpg (1000x700, 61K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=RkprNi_j0RY
twitter.com/AnonBabble

>niche_product.jpg
>we live in a society

>implying socialist soibois wouldn't need twice as many

Bugman culture is a consequence of capitalism, even if most of them want a social-democratic welfare state

>Implying the USSR, North Korea or any similar countries accepted this sort of shit

Nigger they used have hundreds of people making fancy eggs for king's and shit

Attached: 7DF92763-713C-4FF4-876B-28AD1116E3E9.jpg (390x285, 34K)

Only a very small fraction of people have the means to make things. If you want the things they can make for yourself, you're gonna need money.

That's just the way it is. Do you think life would be richer without "stuff"?

Attached: Dickss.webm (530x298, 1.91M)

>dildos are art
lefties lmao

You're right but this site is now filled with right-wing bootlicker cucks who will never accept this fact. Marx was 100% spot-on about capitalism, the only stuff he got wrong was his idea that morals/borders/religion/families weren't needed.

Based and strasserpilled

How's this not original wtf

Attached: 1493938623900.png (2000x1333, 635K)

These. Soiboys would have starved to death or been sent to the gulag under socialism. Capitalism is just as responsible for cultural degeneracy as it as for cultural and economic prosperity.

You... do know that's the whole point, right? We can have specialized goods in a system that allows free exchange because people value those goods enough to pay for them. If they didn't value [thing] it would not be manufactured.
There are complaints to be levied against many current day economic practices. This is really not one of them.

Attached: That makes me hit the desk!.png (240x240, 24K)

>im not doing very well
>im kinda failing everything desu
>i don't like it
>i don't like things
>...
>fucking clown world brehs

>strasserpilled
many more such cases than you might think

Socialism is also responsible for economic prosperity

>Fastest growing economies of the 20th century: People's Republic of China and USSR
>Only country to not have a depression every ~7 years: People's Republic of China

The Socialist bloc countries weren't rich by anyone's standards, but only because they started out much poorer--Russia, China et al were backwards third world nations with illiterate populations who became superpowers overnight and experienced unprecedented economic prosperity and opportunity for advancement. People who were trapped as peasants and serfs before the revolutions were becoming doctors and professors and engineers, and they did it without enslaving a foreign population like the British and Americans needed to do to advance--socialism enabled them to lift themselves up by their own bootstraps, without any vampiric rent-seeking (((bourgeoisie))) to siphon off their lifeblood.

Attached: e699b2ccb1f3ca02b4db31553859aef3e0f921b9f356a0a38d1c19b5bbb5a6a1.png (1118x1600, 1.78M)

Internationalism is important, not globalism. We should recognize that the working class of all countries have more in common with one another than we do with the rich in our own countries, who see us like insects. Our goal should be to help all peoples of the world lift themselves up and make their own countries great--only in a future like that can we ever talk about open borders. Capitalism creates the need for mass, unchecked immigration because of supply and demand--the capitalist seeks to reduce the cost of labour, and therefore he seeks to maximize the supply of labour. This may hurt you, the worker, but it doesn't matter because the system doesn't exist to serve you, it exists to serve the Capitalist. Capitalists talk all day about "building the wall", yet they never do. Who has actually "built the wall"? Those who follow the immortal science of Marx, Lenin and Stalin.

Attached: 1543601900229.jpg (900x972, 165K)

>Your money, or your life!
>In the country of the heartless rich, sickness is a business prospect for doctors.
>Hand over your wallet, or lie down and die!

notice the (((doctor)))

Attached: DYsCkQiWsAAdHCa.jpg (782x567, 97K)

>Socialism is also responsible for economic prosperity

USSR only lasted 74 years and ended up in economic collapse while china abandoned total socialism and instituted state sanctioned capitalism.

Your whole argument is moot.

>The Socialist bloc countries weren't rich by anyone's standards, but only because they started out much poorer.

yeah they started poor and remained poor, why do you think Eastern Europe is a shit hole now ?, most people blame the Soviet Union for that.

Attached: 25d.jpg (951x972, 104K)

youtube.com/watch?v=RkprNi_j0RY

Attached: RZNP2XbR_400x400.jpg (240x240, 6K)

>USSR only lasted 74 years and ended in economic collapse

If you were told it was an economic collapse, you've been lied to. It was a coup, in the New Union Referendum 77% of peoples across the entire USSR voted to maintain the USSR. It was illegally dissolved by the Yeltsinite clique, and it resulted in as much as 40% reduction in wages in some republics. Today many Russian men do not live to see 60, and majority of Russians wish the USSR would return. In minority republics like Kazakhstan, over 90% voted to maintain the USSR. This is the only referendum in USSR's history that was audited and considered valid by western observers. There was no economic collapse, merely a slowdown due to liberal bullshit post-Stalin

>yeah they started poor and remained poor, why do you think Eastern Europe is a shit hole now ?, most people blame the Soviet Union for that.

Under USSR people in eastern europe were as wealthy as they had ever been, and grew exponentially wealthier than they had been before. The social wage paid by Marxism-Leninism gave them unprecedented access to school, healthcare, stable living etc. Before the revolution the USSR had the same GDP as Brazil, after the revolution they became a competitor for world supremacy--this is like Ethiopians inventing UFOs tomorrow, it was unthinkable at the time.

Peoples of the USSR also did not have the benefit of hundreds of years of slavery and robbery of foreign nations that helped springboard the US, Britain and France to prosperity--they did it themselves, for themselves.

>le nazis on le other hand...

Attached: starving nnazis 2.png (945x1761, 186K)

>DEFEND YOUR RACE BY STARVING, GOY--I MEAN, ARYAN MAN

Attached: starving nazis 1.png (740x581, 32K)

le white defener

Attached: starving nazis 3.jpg (1648x888, 339K)

The economic gap between some USSR countries, such as the Baltic states, and Western Europe was far smaller before they were occupied by the USSR than what it was when USSR collapsed
You'd be hard pressed to find industrialized countries that did not experience unprecedented economic growth post-WW2. However, that growth was far lesser during the 1945-1990 period in some, if not most USSR states, than what it could have been inder capitalism

>i post anime girl and talk in a way i think makes me sound smart

Attached: sddefault.jpg (640x480, 84K)

supply and demand nigga

people want dildos and people will accept money in exchange for creating them. what's the problem here?

>Before the revolution the USSR had the same GDP as Brazil, after the revolution they became a competitor for world supremacy--this is like Ethiopians inventing UFOs tomorrow, it was unthinkable at the time.

This is actually statistically false.

It took the USSR until 1936 to return to the GDP that the Russian Empire produced under the Czar in 1913.

The entire reason the Kaiser was willing to risk it all on a roll of the dice in 1914 is because his general staff told him that based on their relative GDP growth rates, he was running out of time to be able to outclass Russia.

Russia from 1885 to 1913 was the equivalent of China now - previously backward, but with such explosive growth rates that they were viewed as *the* coming world power and a global threat.

It's not about supplying the demand but allowing extreme degeneracy ideals to flourish and looking the other way just as long as it makes a nice tidy profit. They'd be heavy demand for loli sex dolls too if they were made (someone is going to tell me there are already).

I'm sorry, sir, you seem to have finished your post early. Were you trying to form some kind of argument?

what the fuck is clown world why have I heard about that 3 times today.

you havent taken the honkpill, fren?

>i post anime girl and make a point describing my viewpoint

what's the problem here?

There are loli sex dolls tho. And I dont see the problem with allowing people to use sex toys and robots in the privacy of their homes. How is that degeneracy?

The easy access to porn and sex toys decreases the rate of rape and sexual asault. Sex dolls are Literally anti degeneracy.

Fuck porn and related shit ruined me. Jow Forums wants you to think overwise because "muh if we dont have capitalism then we can't keep exploiting you ! And you won't have all this shitty distractions like porn!"

pic kinda related

Attached: 220px-1921._Нестор_Махно_в_лагере_для_перемещенных_лиц_в_Рум (220x340, 17K)