wtf you lied to me Jow Forums
I am just wasting my fucking time
wtf you lied to me Jow Forums
I am just wasting my fucking time
Diet at weight loss studies are almost impossible to control for over meaningful durations of time.
People cheat and 90% of people have shit willpower and less than 5% have grit. The current culture of zero personal responsibility and intrinsically sedentary lifestyles due to te built environment exacerbate this.
Dude just read the research article itself not the news source. There are also millions of studies that go against that anyway. Be academic about this
Initially lost weight in 2016, have maintained so far. Maybe I'm still in the grace period before I rebound?
your ganna make it stop reading jew articles
>trusting the media with your health decisions
Never going to make it.
>High protein diet
>Lift weights
>Intermittent fasting with a caloric restriction
This works 100% of the time its applied.
(((obesity research)))
lol
Yeah, you're completely right. Just give up.
Leaves more sloots for me.
>Research
There are few things in this world that both induces a cringe sensation and a sense of hopelessness than the phrases "research says", "science says", "experts say". Because we've been through this junk pseudoscience before, again and again and again.
If you can gain it, you can lose it. If you can lose it, you can gain it. This is childlike logic, but it's still relevant. We can all make it - only if we want to.
>if you stop your diet and go back to your old bad habits you'll gain weight again
how is this fair? I stopped eating cakes and cookies for a whole month!
Dont make the mistake of misinterpreting the study
A controlled diet and regular activity works, the problem is that you have to stick to it , forever
All this study shows is that obese people who lose weight, pretty much always regain the weight because they dont stick to the diet.
I think you're more than capable of keeping it off. Just stick to your fundamentals and eat at your new maintenance. It'll become a habit before you know it.
imagine trusting what mainstram media says about health and dieting while sponsored by IDK FUCKING MCDONALDS
>stop trying to be healthy, ya goy bastids!
What the study actually says:
>caloric deficit will make you lose weight
>but if you eat at a surplus after you'll gain weight back
Who'd've thunk.
Now fuck off and go be fat somewhere else.
EVERY
FUCKING
TIME
that's not what that study fuckins says. every time someone tries to say this I have to remind them that just because it doesn't happen doesn't mean that it's impossible. When you restrict diet, you lose weight. Once people stop restricting diet, they gain weight. It really isn't that hard. Most people just go back to eating like fucking pigs after the study is over, hence they gain weight. It's a personal problem people want to blame on outside factors. these are just weak people.
Nobody gets fat eating too much chicken breast and spinach. They absolutely go back to Starbucks and pizza
sure, but you don't have to gain weight even if you drink starbucks and eat pizza. literally all they have to do is to stop eating like fucking pigs
Listen man if you like eating junk food as in fact for pleasure with very little gain in return (sugar) then yes you will never be thin, being thin is about seeing food as a source to keep you alive and enjoy it at its worst at correct moments in life
More outright-corrupt incorrect interpretations of data being pushed to bait sympathy and hateclicks.
>NEVER IMPROVE
Statistically this is true, the reason it triggers Jow Forums so badly is because Jow Forums is full of ex or current fatties who don't want to believe they'll be back to where they started within a few years.
>Used to weigh 108kg
>Weigh only 84kg at 190cm.
>Longterm weightloss is impossible.
It isn't as long as you stick to losing weight in a healthy manner.
They're not saying it's impossible, they're saying it's statistically unlikely.
Yeah because some fat people don't have enough discipline to lose the excess weight.
>almost
Making it is almost impossible. being wealthy, happy, in shape and disciplined is almost impossible. A well established philosophy born of reading, researching, and understanding, is almost impossible. Balancing your family, your career, your politics, and your personal wellbeing is almost impossible. The point is there are lots of things almost impossible.
You need to have a hard look at your life and ask yourself if you'll be one of the other hundred thousand people, or if you'll be different. Your frame of mind is the difference between making it, both spiritually and physically. There is no second place prize, there is no finish line at the end. You might even die trying, but if you do you'll die on your own terms and accept your death as part of the natural world and the existence. Nature ties you to existence and to people, and nature eventually will untie you. Your last thoughts have already taken place, and will take place again. Await that moment with acceptance of your tie to nature, and happiness for the life you lived. Do not be 'almost' proud of the existence you had.
Good luck
>t. lurker of many years.
they're not fat in the first place for nothing, you get fat because you eat a lot of shit, consistently.
So yeah for most they will not do what it takes to lose the weight, because they are not used to.
I knew a guy who went from a morbidly obese 350lbs to a slim, perfectly normal dude. He hasn't gotten fat again and its been like 2 decades at this point.
I believe it.
Being obese isnt just overweight
Being obese means you are a hamplanet - I'm sure that leaves lasting damage to your body and I'm not surprised if there is no way back.
You can be slim after being a bit overweight though.
So what?
Dude its not possible long term just give up lmao
the article should be: fatasses have 0 willpower and even a slight feeling of hunger must be instantly dealt with because if they dont indulge they will starve to death instantly
The longer you go the more unlikely you are to rebound, your odds would be very low at this stage. Stay vigilant though.
See