Narrative pushed

Who's pushing this shit? There's clearly a massive effort to highlight the female involvement, but is it organised or organically arisen?

Woman gets credit for a whole team effort. Fucking clown world.

Thats so hilarious and disgusting at the same time. This is why I only use reddit for niche subreddits, the popular ones are full of false news.

Imagine being the guy that did most of the work and waking up to this shit.

It's astroturfing.
They are prepping something big.
Jow Forums is a shill wasteland and has been for 16 hours now.

This guy is probably on suicide watch. I cannot imagine doing the majority of the work and getting overshadowed by a women posing for a selfie. Lmao.

Jesus Christ. It's recognizing a female for a historic accomplishment she played a role in.
>narrative pushed
Like the fucking narrative you're pushing you quadruple nigger?

If people care about black holes they are fags

>we find a literal fucking black hole in the coldness of space and this is what happens

okay guys. i'm finally ready to die.

Attached: 1371276394034.jpg (550x453, 55K)

>overshadowed
How? Do you think press coverage is why scientists do their work you fucking autist?

We always knew they were there. This is just the first time we can visualize them. Also I'm with you.

Be honest, how would you feel if you accomplished 90% of a project and all of the credit (and opportunities that come afterward) went to someone else and they were lauded as a genius for something you did.

Funny how they are doing this thus implying women are inferior to men because just one chick who was a part of it is SOMETHIGN AMAZING but in the same time they try to make me believe men and women are the same and always have been. Oh the contradictions.
Ayways, something like black holes don't exist. We are living on a flat, finite plane. There is not such thing as galaxy and that picture is a CGI which anyone with photoshop could make.

You guys are all retarded, almost all of his lines are auto generated data. Also, Katie talked about the algorithm in a Ted Talk years ago.

Attached: 1527581873551.gif (480x292, 1.99M)

You are a retard and a fool. There was a whole team behind the algorithm. This woman didnt accomplish anything, she was part of the team thats all.

Look at this idiot, did you even bother looking up her contributions? Go back to redddit or retardera.

This was a collaboration of more than 200 people. You think 1 fucking scientist did 9p% of the work, retard?

>this woman didn't accomplish anything
Every single article says she HELPED, not that she did it by herself. Anything to push your women bad narrative, right faggot?

>Everyone who disagrees with me must use a website I don't like, so that means they're stoopid lul

Did you even look at his code? It's almost entirely auto generated data. They both contributed important things to the project. She was talking about the algorithm in presentations a couple of years ago. You're mad because a woman did something cool.

Normies seem to think it was entirely her and the entire media is giving her all the credit.
Shame for those 200 people to be completely bulldozed by one person. So anyways, how would you feel if one person took all the credit of the work of you and 200 of your peers purely for political purposes

>not that she did it by herself
It's literally in the fucking picture you stupid fuck.

>She developed the algorithm.
>Despite what haters say, most of the scientific breakthroughs are made possible by dedicated Americans like Katie Bouman.
>Women are amazing!
>The first image of a black hole was brought to you by Katie Bouman.

You are such a fool, dont you see that they are using her for publicity and women inclusivity points. Every single article says the same "Katie Bouman did or lead..." in their title, which is false.

Doesn't matter if she did something cool anymore. She is now polarized because some retard journalist wanted to push an agenda. So instead of being part of the group that visualized black holes. She is either the dumb bitch who took credit or the model example of women in science.

It really makes me mad and sad. This is truly a clown world.

Attached: 023.png (680x680, 221K)

>normies think she did it by herself
Nobody thinks this. All the scientists receive credit. The media does not bestow merit to scientific advances.
Quit pushing a false narrative you dumb twat.
>headline
>not the actual article
It's almost like headlines exist to generate interest in a topic you dumbshit.
>who developed a crucial algorithm THAT HELPED
>meet Katie Bouman, one woman WHO HELPED
Disingenuous as fuck. Quit astroturfing.

Or, as portrayed, a female scientist who helped in the project.
Quit trying to make this political. We get it, you hate women and feel entitled to sex.

>Nobody thinks this. All the scientists receive credit.
Then why so much focus on that one WAMAN?

>who developed a crucial algorithm THAT HELPED
>who developed
Thanks for proving my point.

Are you paid for this? You have a dog in this fight, why? She literally is taking credit(knowing or unknowingly) for this shit. Doesn't matter which way you slice it, she's soaking up all this media attention.

Because it's similar to the historic photo of a woman standing next to code she helped write.
>a single algorithm was used in a collaborative effort between scientists across the world
Nice narrative push

To add to that no one made a big fuss about the women working in ligo and how they helped with measuring gravitational waves and even got data on the amount of energy two black holes merging put out. Which is way the fuck cooler to know how much energy black holes produce than to see a red doughnut.

It's good your acknowledging that her contributions were blown out of proportion along with all the media praise she is getting. I'm glad we agree

>she is taking credit
For participating in a historic project. Which she did.
>are you getting paid
My payment is calling out your narrative pushing

>Because it's similar to the historic photo of a woman standing next to code she helped write.
But she almost did NOTHING for the project.

You got school soon, champ. Hope they teach you to not be a cunt.

>Narrative pushing this hard
Cite any of her colleagues saying she didn't contribute.

Tuns out, she did a sub sub sub part of a programm. A sort of 'adaptor' that just reformats certain data into another format, and then feeds it into the ACTUAL programm.

That misrepresentation of what she actually contributed and what she actually did is nauseing.
Either nepotism on the part of the institution OR the jewmedia.

Sources :

here, what SHE wrote ( HOPSTOOLS ) :
github.com/klbouman/hopstools

Here the mother program, where that optional part of her is added, where it acts as a sort of interface to import one more datatype by reformatting it.

source :
github.com/sao-eht/eat/graphs/contributors

It's kinda ridiculous, how the jew media morphs this into something COMPLETEY different.

btw: that's also NOT an algo, but just reformatting data.

---

You dont understand - she did NOT write and algo at all. sche did NOT write an image tool at all.

What she did code is at max about 4 pages of code - but more importantly - is neither an algo, nor a imaging program
but is an ADAPTOR for a source of data, which reformats the data to feed it into the mother program - of which she contributed that adaptor, which makes up ca 0.01% of said mother program at max AND is marked as "optional" part of the program

sources :
github.com/sao-eht/eat/graphs/contributors

---

Her whole bundle ("hopstools") here was merged into the mother programm and counted as one commit of 'mother' program.
hopstools, of which she did at max 25%
Her share on contribution on this actual imaging program is about 0.3% max, but OK lets say 1% -
So she did less than 1/4 of 1% of the work. max. If we're very generous.

this little part is the share that her contribution does.
And again : HOPSTOOLS is just an adaptor for another dataformat that can be read into the 'mother' programm. that's it.

---

Let me end by saying this : FUCK Jews and FUCK Cunts for their eternal, pathological lying

Attached: image0.png (980x1593, 104K)

I smell a Jew, must have been left undone. Back into the oven with you

I will cite this:

See .
filter only need apply to posts instead of replies

Attached: autopilot.gif (388x400, 146K)

damnit if it weren't for that damn filter

Attached: 1551226137329.gif (420x420, 289K)

>she is either the dumb bitch who took credit or the model example of women in science.
This.

To insecure, useless women they're going to identify with her to compensate for their own lack of innovation. They're going to turn her into some sassy badass real-life Hermione Granger or Katniss Whatever-deen.

Likewise, this is a woman who has done more with her life in the last, what, thirty years (?), than all the robots on this page screeching about her will ever accomplish. Of course they have to strike down at her and insist that there was a man better and greater than her. A man that they can project themselves onto to avoid admitting that they're inferior to and less happy than a woman somewhere.

Ultimately, the tragedy of being a woman in scientist is that you can never fail or succeed. You are always a woman first, whatever that may mean to the world.

>Jow Forums is a shill wasteland and has been for 16 hours now
Hah! You must be new here.

Are you trolling right?

Shes taking credit for a work of 200 people, it would make sense if she was the leader of one the teams or the major contributor, but shes neither of those things.

The title in articles are the only thing normies read, it doesnt matter if they explain inside it that she was part of a project with teams around the world. They read the title and move on with their day, which is what happened in reddit.

I see. You're citing 4 days of her work in January as the entirety of her work?
Nice narrative push
Don't you have a Darth Vader LARP dude to watch? Kummandunt or some shit?
>she takes credit for the work of 200
Did she contribute to writing code for the project? That is all she is receiving credit for.

I can smell the hormones from here. Your passive aggressive post is reminiscent of tranny tactics.

Based user doing God's work exposing the kikes and whores

>I see. You're citing 4 days of her work in January as the entirety of her work?
>Nice narrative push

>17 aug 2018, 18 jan 2019, 19 mar 2018, and two others that weren't dated

Nice deflection, shill.

Check the dates you absolute retard.

>done more with her life

Her contribution to the project was marked as optional

/thread.
Origgngj

She's receiving credit for coding. Did she perform coding on the project?

>ad hom
Nice try.

>her contribution is marked as optional
And she's a doctor and professor. What are you?

Shes fucking ugly what the fuck?

You know who else coded on the project? About 200 other people. But they didn't get the benefit of this because they aren't women

You get your butt pounded tranny, who fucking cares what you think.

It isn't hard to out-do robots. I do more with my life than 90% of the NEETs on here just by walking outside of my house and nothing else. Not the same user btw

>She's receiving credit for coding.
Wrong.
>She's receiving almost all of the credit for coding.
Correct.
>Did she perform coding on the project?
Technically, but miniscule compared to Achael's work.

No one's sayign she didn't write anything. She didn't do even 1% of job on the project and is the only one being pushed down our throats in such a manner that i thought she alone did the job when I first read the articles.
Also nice goalpost moving.

https:\\discordapp.com\invite\8qeq9Xn

--x

Attached: file 24.png (800x800, 491K)

>they didn't benefit of this
What is the benefit? A bunch of trolls shitting on her for having a photo?
K
>did she perform coding
>technically
Then she is receiving proper credit, quit pushing a narrative
>I thought she was the only one when I read the article
Then you have poor reading comprehension

>Quit pushing a narrative.
Hypocritical, coming from you. You support someone getting all the credit simply because she has a hole between her legs. People should receive credit proportional to their contribution.

>all the credit
Strawman. Narrative pushing le women bad meme

>Then you have poor reading comprehension
No I don't since now I now the truth, do I? It's just that the first page articles are written in such way that they make you think that's the case. 99% of people won't look deeper into the topic, they will believe what the titles said. Those who push their agenda know about it.

Are u a woman? Send nudes.

Attached: resize_image.jpg (540x450, 23K)

Read the news nigger where they claim that SHE designed the algorithm which made this possible when in reality her contribution is optional.

who fucking cares honestly. the black hole is what should be interesting, not the cunts behind it, the fucking msm and internet for normies was a mistake, they get hooked by the most retarded pointless shite

all around me are these honkler faces D:

>99% of people won't look past the headline
Of which you are a part.
Nope, but I've plessured infinitely more than you have.
If you click her profile after following the link on the "debunk" post, you can literally debunk your narrative. Though, that's assuming you have the coding background to understand what's in the link you cunt

>Of which you are a part.
I am here exposing the reality am I not?

very based and schopenhauerpilled

>exposing the reality
Her algorithm is what put together the information from across the globe to create the actual image. It's optional because the information would've confirmed the findings, without producing an image.
You'd of known that if you even read the goddamn Fox news article dipshit.
Every post you've made has demonstrated you couldn't even read the subheadlines which say "contributed"/"helped"/etc.

Super Mario Galaxy pretty much showed us how they look like years before her

>Her algorithm is what put together the information from across the globe to create the actual image.
I was doing compressing algorithms (which were once used in professional fields - ByteRun) at uni on my first semestre of Computer Science. She literally did just that and not only not by herself, but was only a part of this small portion of the program. You got a wrong user to shittalk to about CS based problems.

Please stop making me care about this stupid fucking black hole. I don't care.

God I fucking hate the internet.

I opened her github nigger.Her contribution is optional.

Pic related is the code for algorithm I was talking about. 4 pages, as someone said here is the amount of code she made. I made this whole algorithm alone on 1st semestre in college. In about one-one and half a month, while having other classes to take care about. She wrote her code in a couple of years. Truly pathetic.

Attached: code.png (1626x573, 55K)

If you click your link you'll see her further work was logged in the overall project and not under the portion you're citing
>I had a semester of coding at uni one time
La-di-da
Yes, a picture is optional because the data can be interpreted without one.

>I had a semester of coding at uni one time
So not only are you a shill but also have reading comprehention deficite? I said I was doing this shit on the FIRST semestre in college, not that i had merely one semestre of coding. Read you absolutely buttblasted faggot.
What else are you going to deflect now?

Your retarded monkey ass really believes this picture was created by her to interpret data.Holy shit you are worse than sub Saharan niggers.Kys faggot.

The Hops algorithm is not the algorithm that is being talked about.

the HOPS algorithm is not the one that is being credited.
>to interpret data
Didn't say that. I said data interpretation wasn't the point of her contribution retard.

>there are people in this thread who actually think the number of lines you write relates to how good your code is

Is this a code for ants? Anyway
>doesn't say what it codes for
>"because I followed the instructions on a college assignment that makes me better than a MIT alum, professor and doctor because my dic- I mean code, is better."
Could you be more insecure?

Attached: this is an anal-gee.png (861x535, 881K)

>Is this a code for ants?
Lmao, no, just tried to fit the 4 pages one one pic.

>doesn't say what it codes for
1. Who the fuck cares, a compressing algorithm always does the same fucking thing. Actually mine worked both ways, it compressed and decomprssed.
2. I actually did say what algorithm that is, look up you shaking faggot.

Well enlighten me on her contribution.Even on her github most of the commits are by other contributors.How exactly did she develop the novel highly creative algorithm without which that shit image could never
have been achieved?

Well which algorithm is it then?

girl or minority: *does something*
news and social media: LOOK AT THIS ARENT THEY SO SMART DAWWW

>just tried
Yeah, I'm sure that had nothing to do you not wanting to open yourself up to criticism.

>who the fuck cares
>he literally doesn't understand why the content of a code might be relevant to him calling someone pathetic

>I did say
I'm not the person who was arguing with you before. Calm down.

She is first author on the paper from which the algorithm is derived.

>some dude who took a first year computer science class thinks he's better than a postdoc at MIT because he took more pages to do the same thing

>HURR DURR ROASTIE LOL
>SCIENCE WOMAN BAD!

Kys faggot. Nobody will miss you. You have done nothing for others in your life. Your family will force themselves to act sad for a few weeks but they will be relieved when you kill yourself. Your friends... Well, I dont need to finish that sentence do I?

>Yeah, I'm sure that had nothing to do you not wanting to open yourself up to criticism.
Nice bait. I will surely give you my code which you could sell for students or use in any other way. I would actually do it if you weren't just a goalpost moving Jow Forumsedditor shill with his little agenda. Also, I didn't even have to make that post and show it anyways, you absolute seething test lacking faggot.

>he literally doesn't understand why the content of a code might be relevant to him calling someone pathetic
Oh now that I literally pointed out that compressing alg means that it does fucking COMPRESSION, that I said which algorithm that is (ByteRun) n-n-now what matters is how the code is written. I literally wrote code that did the job of professional picture compressing and decompressing programs on my first semestre. I bet bitch from OP was happy about writing "Hello World" code at the same time. It doesn't even matter how it looks like, but of course this is the only thing you are left with that you are able to cling to because you got rekt in all the previous fields.

>I'm not the person who was arguing with you before. Calm down.
I don't care, you literally started crying about me not saying what algorithm that was in a post that was a response to my own post which did say waht algorithm I am talking about, you seething shill.