Why is it that even the biggest ecelebs have virtually zero relevance outside the Internet? This dude has nearly 100 million subscribers yet I havent heard his name spoken even once IRL.
Why is it that even the biggest ecelebs have virtually zero relevance outside the Internet...
Brandon Cruz
Other urls found in this thread:
Robert Morales
his fans are children?
James Fisher
according to Jow Forumsfags its acceptable to watch him above the age of 12
Josiah Jenkins
Because you are not in social circle where people discuss celebs?
Samuel Perez
Jow Forumstards are mental children
Charles Diaz
Because his contribution to society is null
From a neutral context, what's there to discuss pewdipie about? it's just a manchild screaming over video games.
Andrew Moore
98% of celebs have zero relevance outside their respective circles
Leo Rivera
Conservatives simply want to be self-reliant, while libtards want to suck at the teat of the government and be cradled for their entire lives, and go through endless mental gymnastics to convince themselves it is economically possible. Therefore, it is lefties, not poltards, that are children, friend. Remember to commit suicide as soon as you can.
Dominic Lewis
How the fuck do you even pronounce his last name?
Jeremiah Miller
>Conservatives simply want to be self-reliant
yeah, and there's a lot of fat people that just want to be fit, doesn't mean they actually do jack shit about it though. Nothing about watching pewdiepie will make you self reliant, if anything, it's the opposite because you're wasting time watching braindead entertainment.
Nathan Rodriguez
>filename
cool PNG. I love Feels Guy, he's my favorite meymey
Elijah Watson
>watching mindless entertainment for an hour a week means you never do anything with your life
Nice strawman argument.
Leo Sanders
There are more catalogued meemees where that came from
Parker Watson
Government, corporations, and mainstream media are doing everything they can to reduce the power of those individuals, as they threaten their control over the public.
Ethan Gonzalez
I've heard robert de niro's name from one person my whole life
Adrian Carter
PDP is literally r/Jow Forums: the person. He only managed to stay relevant for a while by directly pulling content from here
Levi Rogers
>some dude who hasnt been relevant since the 90s vs someone nearly Internet-using zoomer and millennial knows about
Kayden Perry
you clearly have no clue about anything involving politics. have fun fighting a straw man for the rest of your life.
Jeremiah Walker
>nearly 100 million subscribers
Remeber that he promised to delete his channel at 100 mios. Never forget.
Proof here.
youtube.com
Hunter Rogers
>implying the average Jow Forums user actually only spends one hour a week on mindless entertainment
kek
Brody Young
Is that why so many dipshit "conservatives" suddenly support Yang because he wants to give them NEETbux too?
Nolan Nelson
Shellberg
Blake James
Don't get in the way of my yangbux
Dominic Parker
While all the conservative / liberal arguing in this thread is of course welcome, it doesn't really answer the question.
There are cable TV shows and Netflix shows with EXTREMELY limited audiences (stuff like "Killing Eve", for example) but despite the fact that like 10 people watch the show the stars are still considered "celebrities". On that basis someone with 100 million subscribers should be a celebrity, even if not all subscribers watch each video.
I think it's generational, in that boomers use YouTube to watch one-off viral videos for the most part and don't really watch recurring content. And boomers also feel, way deep in their bones, that "being on TV" or "being in movies" makes you a celebrity, and other stuff doesn't. So they are strongly resistant to considering YouTube personalities to be celebrities.