How are cutfag robots coping with the fact that the jews literally stole the most pleasurable part of their body
How are cutfag robots coping with the fact that the jews literally stole the most pleasurable part of their body
Other urls found in this thread:
sexasnatureintendedit.com
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
cirp.org
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
labblog.uofmhealth.org
twitter.com
>pic
kak tam zarubezhom? is ur anus ready already
Don't really care. Will never touch a vagaga anyways.
THANK YOU ORIGINAL POST OUTLAW
POPE
personally, at least I had a bad case of phimosis. still sucks. no need to be so mean, though, but I guess stupid normies who are in denial.
How is a cut dick harmful to the vagina?
I'll never get any chance for sex in my life plus I don't masturbate so it doesn't bother me
Daily reminder that the cut is performed to desensitize the male and rednder him apathetic to sex
Imagine having to question how friction with a dry, calloused dick is harmful
Cosmetic surgery on an infant's genitals is strange don't you think?
I hope that foregen shit works out okay.
Im a cut jew and I honestly can't fathom why circumcision is something we still do to infants.
Cosmetic surgical removal of am piece of their dick, well before the child has any comprehension let alone capacity to consent. It should be illegal for any doctor to cut any child's penis for a non-medically necessitated reason.
Not gonna obsess overmy own dick for the rest of my life because it works fine but damn, how can we continue this barbaric process. Imagine telling the doc when your baby's born, that you want them to cut some other piece of them off just because you feel like it. They'd report you to authorities. Insanity.
Doctors gave you phimosis by prematurely retracting your foreskin.
cut penis cant feel so cut guys just ram really fast till their done. Uncut guys are smoother motions i guess because their penis is more sensitive.
>cutlets
Who thought that was a good name?
I don't understand this.... I'm And cut but my dick is super sensitive and I'm good at sex tbqh tbqf famalam
It scrapes the insides.
To be correct though, not all cut penises have that flare. If they did the "beauty cut", the flare is fused to the remaining shaft skin because they stitched it there and let it grow together into one mass.. But even in that case you still lose the gliding action, creating friction irritation.
Studies show that women with circumcised spouses are more likely to report frequent dyspareunia (painful sex)
>Circumcision was associated with frequent orgasm difficulties in Danish men and with a range of frequent sexual difficulties in women, notably orgasm difficulties, dyspareunia and a sense of incomplete sexual needs fulfilment. Thorough examination of these matters in areas where male circumcision is more common is warranted.
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Even long before this, that male circumcision reduces sexual function of both the man and his partner was well-understood. This was used as an argument FOR circumcision, as sexual pleasure has historically been seen by many repressive cultures as something to be suppressed.
>The fact that circumcision weakens the faculty of sexual excitement and sometimes perhaps diminishes the pleasure is indubitable. For if at birth this member has been made to bleed and has had its covering taken away from it, it must indubitably be weakened. The Sages, may their memory be blessed, have explicitly stated: It is hard for a woman with whom an uncircumcised man has had sexual intercourse to separate from him. In my opinion this is the strongest of the reasons for circumcision.
>plus I don't masturbate so it doesn't bother me
Maybe you would if you had a foreskin to play with.
I wasn't going to ever use it anyway lmao
Waiting for foregen, and doing drugs in the meantime to make up for the pleasure I can't get from masturbation
By "drugs" do you mean like weed, or harder stuff? Don't do recreational stims like meth or speed. They can demyelinate your remaining nerves and reduce penis sensation even further.
I do weed and LSD. Both make fapping very fun. yes I think jacking off on LSD is great, not only does it feel better but you get nice thoughts like "man i'm so thankful to exist as a human who can feel this pleasure" and "wow i'm so thankful i exist to perceive girls as cute"
What. Is this broscience, can someone fucking confirm.
It's real.
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
In this particular case the demyelination occurred in her brain itself before she died from multi-organ failure, but there's no reason to assume it wouldn't also occur in nervous tissue in other parts of your body. The myelin sheath of nerve tissue is known to be damaged by oxidation, and taking stims exposes your entire body and all the nerve tissue in it to massive oxidative stress.
They already stole it :(
RIP my pp
i cope with anal
so if I have skin that is the same layer from my thighs up my shaft and covers my penis all the way until a really small hole where I pee I'm not circumcised right?
I see, as a virgin femanon I didnt understand but now I get it. I noticed in burger porn most of the guys are cut and go really hard and fast, so I see why that would hurt if you tried it with an uncut dick. Does the skin get caught or something?
supposedly the cut nature of a circumcised penis makes the hood kind of like a hook that catches and scrapes the vaginal wall in intercourse which I imagine would be uncomfortable but idk because I'm an uncut virgin
>that male circumcision reduces sexual function of both the man and his partner was well-understood.
face-palm. Did Ibn Maymoun perform scientific studies? No. He could've been wrong when he said that it reduced sexual performance/pleasure or whatever.
Male porn actors use Viagra to get hard. Nothing to do with circumcision. If anything, it lets them last longer because of the keratinisation and dulled sensation.
The functionality of the foreskin is actually quite obvious. It was understood that the foreskin was functional tissue even long before the philosophy of science had progressed. This was used as a rationale for cutting it off. They didn't need scientific studies to grasp this, although we now have them in spades. Just like you don't need a scientific study to explain that damaging your eyeball would be likely to harm your vision, or damaging your teeth would make it harder to eat.
>damaging your eyeball
Except now you're pre-supposing damage is taking place. Not every surgery you do to the body is "damaging it". By your reasoning, we've known since ancient times that cutting your eye with a laser damages your vision.
>Except now you're pre-supposing damage is taking place.
It obviously is. You are amputating a considerable amount of normal tissue from someone's body. The male prepuce has a massive amount of feeling in it, which is easily demonstrable by simply stimulating it. Modern histology shows that this is due to the specialized innervation of the tissue. Ancient people didn't know about neurology, but they did know that the foreskin was sensory tissue, as Maimonides demonstrated, and Philo Judaeus of Alexandria had written about centuries even before Maimonides.
>Not every surgery you do to the body is "damaging it".
No, all surgeries damage the body, and doctors themselves will tell you this.
>"Surgery is basically controlled injury," says Wang, whose background is in trauma medicine. "You're 'whacking' patients and hoping that in the end they do better overall because you've interrupted the disease process."
That's an inherent part of what surgery is. Outside the realm of purely cosmetic operations, surgeries are performed when the damage done to halt or mitigate the disease process is seen as outweighing the damage done.
>By your reasoning, we've known since ancient times that cutting your eye with a laser damages your vision.
Laser eye surgery is undertaken in an attempt to mitigate the effects of a deformed eye. It damages the eye, inherently, and predisposes the patient to considerable risks that may noticeably persist for the rest of their lives.
A patient must decide whether the damage done and risks are worth the potential for improved vision. There is damage involved in any surgery, period.
There was an error here. I meant to write "outside the realm of purely cosmetic operations, surgeries are performed when the damage done to halt the or mitigate the disease process is seen as less bad than the disease process itself, and a less invasive method of treatment is not feasible".
Isnt the rough head more due to chemicals? Ive seen plenty of uncut people say their head looks like the uncut one and people say its some harsh ass chemicals in soap amd body cleaners that fuck up the skin
Fuck you i never asked for this.
Im just glad i didnt get a tight snip since its such a shit operation nobody even knows how much to cut. I got away with having enough skin to pull halfway up the head even when erect, im thinking of trying those things that stretch yout skin to give you a pseudo-foreskin. Anyone here know about it? Foregen isnt coming within the next 30 years so its my only good option
TL tugger can help you grow a fauxskin.
Damn that looks useful. The issue is restored foreskins look wacky because they're alot thicker than normal foreskins, and im not sure how that would play out since i already have a very loose cut with alot of skin still there