/MBTI/

I don't know the deeper knowledge on this but it makes sense, I guess I always project from an NP perspective.

NP means Ne, and Ne is all about the ideas more than actually acting them out.

Have you done the deep dive into Jung?

oh i know this one, this is the part where for a few seconds i think
>this user gets it, i'd like to talk to this user more about stuff, outside of this thread
then i remember that the odds of that happening are nearly zero in most cases, the futility of everything creeps back in, and i go back to listening to static while slowly rocking and coding.

i hate the irony of being autistic yet feeling alone on Jow Forums so fucking much

fight fire with fire

logical proof is largely meaningless and highly aribtrary. It is useful when talking to useless autists like you, but it generally is not the sharpest tool you have available. Arguments are far more subtle and more about swaying people's opinions, recognizig their feelings and emotions. Rather than attempting to browbeat them with "epik facts and logic". Because the truth is, your feelings don't care about the facts.

Post-truth is the name of the game and it's an exciting one, if you even realize it exists.

>more smug retard posting

>more smug retard posting
he says as he smug retardposts

I have, you get a much better explanation of functions and introversion/extraversion, but not sure you can believe anything else.
Fun things: Jung felt the need to mention Ti counts as Thinking and not Feeling during Te's description.

>Post-truth is the name of the game and it's an exciting one, if you even realize it exists.

do you have a source for this "post-truth" existing, ben shapiro?

NOT AN ARGUMENT LOL
a wise user once told me to fight fire with fire