25-year-old Norwegian girl posts her Tinder stats

>12,403 swipes
>117 right swipes
>(117/12,403)*100 = .94% right swipes
She swiped right on less than 1%.

Attached: itsover.png (3000x800, 93K)

Here's what she looks like.
Stunning, no?

Attached: finngolian.png (1152x648, 418K)

OH NONONONO
LOOKA AT THE TOP OF HER HEAD
HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

>People at an advantage are bad for using their advantage
Isn't this akin to how everyone suggests turning your location to Asia or South America if you're Caucasian, so you can freely decide between the cute or ugly girls?

Also
>Using one dataset as indicative of anything
Clearly you lot never did stata

>>People at an advantage are bad for using their advantage
yeah

What?
She's beautiful.
Like a Genghis Khan rape baby all grown up.
Of course she only deserves the top 1% of men.

lmao at wh*te women

So, when you slap a misbehaving kid, you should go for a full-force smack down, kuz, you know, you have advantage and you should use it.

I think you're confusing suitability of input and comparative advantage. There's a difference between striking someone when they're down in a fight or pulling out a shotgun to shoot them when they're down.

I see there being no point in someone being forced to swipe if they don't want to, which is why having one sample of data is useless since it doesn't give any remote indication of how the other females are in the area, unless we're going to bootstrap the data, the graph is useless (and of course from Reddit)

>wh*te women
She's a Finngolian living in Norway.
Not white.

>source: trust me bro it's totally legit

people can have high standards if they want to, im sure many of the robots here have unrealistically high standards. I dont really see the problem.

but god damn is she ugly. would you really be sad if she didnt swipe right on you? god damn

finns are the whitest people on earth retard

this is it. this is the sexual singularity. buckle up. it's gonna be bumpy

He didn't say having high standards is wrong, this is just proof that incels are right about being fucked because of being at a genetic disadvantage.

Pic related is the purest of Aryan specimens, eh?
You must not be white.

Attached: Mika Häkkinen.jpg (612x458, 32K)

His ancestors rode across the Eurasian step on a Mongol horse, the F1 car of its era.

Attached: mika.jpg (800x533, 71K)

>proof
Incels are too dumb to understand what is fact and what is made up bullshit. Incels are retards who are wrong about everything.

Not saying this isn't still horrifying, but Tinder pretty much forces girls to be picky. What's the point in swiping right on a 7 when you know there's hundreds like them and if you're lucky you might find a 9

Surely the perfect specimens of men she seems worthy of her vagina don't actually match with her? So she ends up not getting laid at all?

>People at an advantage are bad for using their advantage
If the way they use it is to completely fuck over the sexual market then yes, it's pretty bad.
The average woman with these standards will just die alone anyway because she won't find any man that fits her standards even in a pool of 100,000.

Chad will fuck almost anything once, if only for the novelty.

>she swiped right .94%
LMFAO its no longer the 80/20 rule more like the 99.06/0.94 rule

Exactly, 0.94% of men get sex with 99.06% of women.